From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Cc: "Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, franky.lin@broadcom.com,
hante.meuleman@broadcom.com, chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com,
wright.feng@cypress.com, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com,
brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] hostapd 2.4..2.7 broken with 4.18+
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 13:56:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190116135643.bomtxuwljjcusxxf@e5254000004ec.dyn.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4a0053e-5312-1b1f-68c9-ef58642698fa@broadcom.com>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:21:32PM +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 1/16/2019 1:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 01:08:21PM +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> > > On 1/16/2019 1:12 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:49:09PM +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> > > > > Could you try the compile and load test I suggested earlier. I will try to
> > > > > replicate things over here as well.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure that helps:
> > > >
> > > > [588980.874745] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_rxctl resumed on rxctl frame, got 286 expected 286
> > > > [588980.875776] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_rxctl resumed on rxctl frame, got 281 expected 281
> > > > [588980.876925] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_rxctl resumed on rxctl frame, got 2064 expected 2064
> > > > [589095.542690] brcmfmac: brcmf_netdev_wait_pend8021x: Timed out waiting for no pending 802.1x packets
> > > > [589098.262719] brcmfmac: send_key_to_dongle: wsec_key error (-110)
> > > > [589100.822465] brcmfmac: brcmf_cfg80211_del_station: SCB_DEAUTHENTICATE_FOR_REASON failed -110
> > > > [589101.814313] brcmfmac: brcmf_netdev_wait_pend8021x: Timed out waiting for no pending 802.1x packets
> > > > [589104.410194] brcmfmac: send_key_to_dongle: wsec_key error (-110)
> > > > [589106.970045] brcmfmac: brcmf_cfg80211_change_station: Setting SCB (de-)authorize failed, -110
> > > > [589109.530191] brcmfmac: brcmf_cfg80211_del_station: SCB_DEAUTHENTICATE_FOR_REASON failed -110
> > > > [589110.322685] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_rxctl resumed on rxctl frame, got 28 expected 28
> > > > [601235.163954] br0: received packet on wlan0 with own address as source address (addr:6c:ad:f8:05:0d:81, vlan:0)
> > > > [601245.240024] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_rxctl resumed on rxctl frame, got 28 expected 28
> > > > [601264.207886] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_rxctl resumed on rxctl frame, got 28 expected 28
> > > > ...
> > > > [605377.238304] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_rxctl resumed on rxctl frame, got 28 expected 28
> > > > [605395.118751] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_rxctl resumed on rxctl frame, got 28 expected 28
> > > > [605412.976951] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_rxctl resumed on rxctl frame, got 28 expected 28
> > >
> > > So actually it shows me that we are not getting responses. That and the
> > > pend8021x is starting to look pretty fishy, but lacking console messages may
> > > be build issue that I explain further down.
> > >
> > > > Looking at the time the messages (at 589095.542690) are produced, what
> > > > seems to cause this is when I head out with my LineageOS (TI WiLink
> > > > based) phone to the car and drive off. I've suspected that's the case
> > > > with all the previous iterations of this problem too.
> > > >
> > > > At this point, the LineageOS phone is completely unable to reassociate
> > > > with the AP, but it can see the AP with varying amounts of signal - it
> > > > shows medium signal, which drops to nothing when it tries to associate.
> > > > As soon as it stops, the indicated signal seems to come back... not
> > > > sure if that's a LineageOS thing or something that is really happening
> > > > on the Broadcom side.
> > > >
> > > > It looks to me like the older firmware is not happy about a station
> > > > disappearing off into the distance... surely I can't be the only one
> > > > who takes an associated station out of range of a BRCM4330 in hostap
> > > > mode?
> > >
> > > Thanks. Always good to have a scenario to trigger it. I tried setting it up
> > > over here. Everything looks fine but my stations don't see any beacons
> > > coming from it :-(
> > >
> > > > I don't seem to have any messages from the firmware, and I can't find
> > > > anything useful under /sys/kernel/debug for the driver - the only
> > > > thing I have is:
> > > >
> > > > # tree /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy5
> > > > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phy5
> > > > ├── features
> > > > ├── fragmentation_threshold
> > > > ├── fwcap
> > > > ├── fws_stats
> > > > ├── ht40allow_map
> > > > ├── long_retry_limit
> > > > ├── revinfo
> > > > ├── rts_threshold
> > > > └── short_retry_limit
> > >
> > > That is weird. For SDIO it should also have three additional files:
> > >
> > > forensics
> > > counters
> > > console_interval
> > >
> > > The fact that these are absent suggests that sdio.c was not build with DEBUG
> > > define. How do you build the brcmfmac driver?
> >
> > With a split build tree, and brcmfmac as a module. I've just moved
> > drivers/net/broadcom/brcm80211 out of the way and re-built with verbose
> > mode enabled. The gcc lines show that they are indeed passed -DDEBUG.
> >
> > If I look inside the sdio.o object, I do find the strings:
> >
> > intrcount: %u
> > lastintrs: %u
> > pollcnt: %u
> > regfails: %u
> >
> > which are from brcmf_debugfs_sdio_count_read(), and is only built when
> > DEBUG is defined - so the build looks correct. I also find this in the
> > module I have on the target system, so it too was indeed built with
> > -DDEBUG as intended.
> >
> > Nope, your debugfs support can't possibly work for anyone in 4.20.
> >
> > sdio.c sets up the debugfs stuff in brcmf_sdio_debugfs_create() which
> > wants wiphy->debugfsdir. This is called via brcmf_bus_preinit() from
> > brcmf_sdio_bus_preinit(). This happens before brcmf_cfg80211_attach().
> >
> > This is the key point - brcmf_cfg80211_attach() calls wiphy_register(),
> > which is where the wiphy's debugfs directory is setup:
> >
> > /* add to debugfs */
> > rdev->wiphy.debugfsdir =
> > debugfs_create_dir(wiphy_name(&rdev->wiphy),
> > ieee80211_debugfs_dir);
> >
> > Consequently, at the time when brcmf_sdio_debugfs_create() is called,
> > the debugfs directory has not been setup, so the function merely
> > returns.
>
> The patch below works for me so can you provide the counters file contents
> after hitting the issue.
Thanks, it'll probably be a couple of days before I can get anything -
no time to rebuild the kernel today.
>
> Regards,
> Arend
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h
> index c496518..3d441c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bus.h
> @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ struct brcmf_bus_ops {
> int (*get_memdump)(struct device *dev, void *data, size_t len);
> int (*get_fwname)(struct device *dev, const char *ext,
> unsigned char *fw_name);
> + void (*debugfs_create)(struct device *dev);
> };
>
>
> @@ -235,6 +236,15 @@ int brcmf_bus_get_fwname(struct brcmf_bus *bus, const
> char *ext,
> return bus->ops->get_fwname(bus->dev, ext, fw_name);
> }
>
> +static inline
> +void brcmf_bus_debugfs_create(struct brcmf_bus *bus)
> +{
> + if (!bus->ops->debugfs_create)
> + return;
> +
> + return bus->ops->debugfs_create(bus->dev);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * interface functions from common layer
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
> index 7c1da1f..463754a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/core.c
> @@ -1104,6 +1104,7 @@ static int brcmf_bus_started(struct brcmf_pub *drvr,
> struct cfg80211_ops *ops)
> brcmf_debugfs_add_entry(drvr, "revinfo", brcmf_revinfo_read);
> brcmf_feat_debugfs_create(drvr);
> brcmf_proto_debugfs_create(drvr);
> + brcmf_bus_debugfs_create(bus_if);
>
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> index 0cd5b8d..5f9de61 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> @@ -3143,9 +3143,12 @@ static int brcmf_debugfs_sdio_count_read(struct
> seq_file *seq, void *data)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void brcmf_sdio_debugfs_create(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
> +static void brcmf_sdio_debugfs_create(struct device *dev)
> {
> - struct brcmf_pub *drvr = bus->sdiodev->bus_if->drvr;
> + struct brcmf_bus *bus_if = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct brcmf_pub *drvr = bus_if->drvr;
> + struct brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev = bus_if->bus_priv.sdio;
> + struct brcmf_sdio *bus = sdiodev->bus;
> struct dentry *dentry = brcmf_debugfs_get_devdir(drvr);
>
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry))
> @@ -3165,7 +3168,7 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_checkdied(struct brcmf_sdio
> *bus)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void brcmf_sdio_debugfs_create(struct brcmf_sdio *bus)
> +static void brcmf_sdio_debugfs_create(struct device *dev)
> {
> }
> #endif /* DEBUG */
> @@ -3477,8 +3480,6 @@ static int brcmf_sdio_bus_preinit(struct device *dev)
> if (bus->rxbuf)
> bus->rxblen = value;
>
> - brcmf_sdio_debugfs_create(bus);
> -
> /* the commands below use the terms tx and rx from
> * a device perspective, ie. bus:txglom affects the
> * bus transfers from device to host.
> @@ -4088,6 +4089,7 @@ int brcmf_sdio_get_fwname(struct device *dev, const
> char *ext, u8 *fw_name)
> .get_ramsize = brcmf_sdio_bus_get_ramsize,
> .get_memdump = brcmf_sdio_bus_get_memdump,
> .get_fwname = brcmf_sdio_get_fwname,
> + .debugfs_create = brcmf_sdio_debugfs_create
> };
>
> #define BRCMF_SDIO_FW_CODE 0
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-16 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-24 11:09 [REGRESSION] hostapd 2.4..2.7 broken with 4.18+ Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <CAF7Mx6r_q7H4ioFLoF1eKHrvmtE0xViG__uDNByaNjrGGJWx+Q@mail.gmail.com>
2019-01-08 16:40 ` Kalle Valo
2019-01-08 23:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2019-01-09 10:27 ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-01-09 10:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2019-01-11 14:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2019-01-14 11:49 ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-01-14 11:59 ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-01-15 10:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-01-15 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-01-16 0:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-01-16 12:08 ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-01-16 12:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-01-16 12:55 ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-01-16 13:21 ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-01-16 13:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-01-16 14:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
[not found] ` <CAF7Mx6oG0-X=OyrpgYiM-Lt6p+nDpO7X5CWbdaoSieBcc6=57w@mail.gmail.com>
2019-01-16 16:35 ` Kalle Valo
2019-01-17 10:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-01-09 10:29 ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-01-18 20:36 Arend van Spriel
2019-01-18 22:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190116135643.bomtxuwljjcusxxf@e5254000004ec.dyn.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com \
--cc=chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com \
--cc=franky.lin@broadcom.com \
--cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=wright.feng@cypress.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).