linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: don't apply flow control on management frames
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 20:58:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0ca70f2241307c44489653d7074c5017ad93943.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7l6adht.fsf@toke.dk>

On Sat, 2021-03-20 at 01:13 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> 
> One consequence of this is that we create a strict priority queue for
> management frames.

Yes, for iwlwifi that's actually a change. For everyone else (not
setting BUFF_MMPDU_TXQ or STA_MMPDU_TXQ) it already is since it goes
directly to ->tx() and from there to the hardware queue(s).

> With all the possibilities for badness (such as the
> ability of starving all other queues) that carries with it. I guess
> that's probably fine for management frames, though, right? As in, there
> is some other mechanism that prevents abuse of this?

Well, there's just not that many management frames to start with? And
only wpa_supplicant (or root in general) can create them. So I don't
think we need to worry about that yet. With QoS-mgmt frames we might
eventually want to think about that, but even there I'd say we never
really want to drop them.

johannes


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-20 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-19 22:28 [PATCH] mac80211: don't apply flow control on management frames Johannes Berg
2021-03-20  0:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-20 19:58   ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2021-03-22 10:37     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-03-22  9:43 ` Maxime Bizon
2021-03-22  9:46   ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e0ca70f2241307c44489653d7074c5017ad93943.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).