* [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes
@ 2019-09-25 4:06 Ravi Bangoria
2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Fix length calculation for unaligned target Ravi Bangoria
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-09-25 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mpe, mikey, christophe.leroy
Cc: Ravi Bangoria, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev
v3: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2019-July/193339.html
v3->v4:
- Instead of considering exception as extraneous when dar is outside of
user specified range, analyse the instruction and check for overlap
between user specified range and actual load/store range.
- Add selftest for the same in perf-hwbreak.c
- Make ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest more strict by checking address in
check_success.
- Support for 8xx in ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest (Build tested only)
- Rebase to powerpc/next
@Christope, Can you please check Patch 5. I've just build-tested it
with ep88xc_defconfig.
Ravi Bangoria (5):
Powerpc/Watchpoint: Fix length calculation for unaligned target
Powerpc/Watchpoint: Don't ignore extraneous exceptions blindly
Powerpc/Watchpoint: Rewrite ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest
Powerpc/Watchpoint: Add dar outside test in perf-hwbreak.c selftest
Powerpc/Watchpoint: Support for 8xx in ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest
arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 9 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c | 6 +-
arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 76 ++-
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 46 ++
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 37 +-
arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 3 +-
.../selftests/powerpc/ptrace/perf-hwbreak.c | 111 +++-
.../selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak.c | 579 +++++++++++-------
9 files changed, 595 insertions(+), 273 deletions(-)
--
2.21.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread* [PATCH v4 1/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Fix length calculation for unaligned target 2019-09-25 4:06 [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-09-25 4:06 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Don't ignore extraneous exceptions blindly Ravi Bangoria ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-09-25 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mpe, mikey, christophe.leroy Cc: Ravi Bangoria, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev Watchpoint match range is always doubleword(8 bytes) aligned on powerpc. If the given range is crossing doubleword boundary, we need to increase the length such that next doubleword also get covered. Ex, address len = 6 bytes |=========. |------------v--|------v--------| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |---------------|---------------| <---8 bytes---> In such case, current code configures hw as: start_addr = address & ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN len = 8 bytes And thus read/write in last 4 bytes of the given range is ignored. Fix this by including next doubleword in the length. Plus, fix ptrace code which is messing up address/len. Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h | 1 + arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 9 +++-- arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c | 6 ++-- arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 24 +++---------- arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 37 ++++++++++--------- arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 3 +- 7 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h index 7756026b95ca..9c1b4aaa374b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/debug.h @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static inline int debugger_break_match(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; } static inline int debugger_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; } #endif +int hw_breakpoint_validate_len(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *hw); void __set_breakpoint(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk); bool ppc_breakpoint_available(void); #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h index 67e2da195eae..27ac6f5d2891 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint { unsigned long address; u16 type; u16 len; /* length of the target data symbol */ + u16 hw_len; /* length programmed in hw */ }; /* Note: Don't change the the first 6 bits below as they are in the same order @@ -33,6 +34,11 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint { #define HW_BRK_TYPE_PRIV_ALL (HW_BRK_TYPE_USER | HW_BRK_TYPE_KERNEL | \ HW_BRK_TYPE_HYP) +#define HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN 0x7 + +#define DABR_MAX_LEN 8 +#define DAWR_MAX_LEN 512 + #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT #include <linux/kdebug.h> #include <asm/reg.h> @@ -44,8 +50,6 @@ struct pmu; struct perf_sample_data; struct task_struct; -#define HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN 0x7 - extern int hw_breakpoint_slots(int type); extern int arch_bp_generic_fields(int type, int *gen_bp_type); extern int arch_check_bp_in_kernelspace(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *hw); @@ -70,6 +74,7 @@ static inline void hw_breakpoint_disable(void) brk.address = 0; brk.type = 0; brk.len = 0; + brk.hw_len = 0; if (ppc_breakpoint_available()) __set_breakpoint(&brk); } diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c index 5f66b95b6858..8531623aa9b2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c @@ -30,10 +30,10 @@ int set_dawr(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk) * DAWR length is stored in field MDR bits 48:53. Matches range in * doublewords (64 bits) baised by -1 eg. 0b000000=1DW and * 0b111111=64DW. - * brk->len is in bytes. + * brk->hw_len is in bytes. * This aligns up to double word size, shifts and does the bias. */ - mrd = ((brk->len + 7) >> 3) - 1; + mrd = ((brk->hw_len + 7) >> 3) - 1; dawrx |= (mrd & 0x3f) << (63 - 53); if (ppc_md.set_dawr) @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static ssize_t dawr_write_file_bool(struct file *file, const char __user *user_buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos) { - struct arch_hw_breakpoint null_brk = {0, 0, 0}; + struct arch_hw_breakpoint null_brk = {0, 0, 0, 0}; size_t rc; /* Send error to user if they hypervisor won't allow us to write DAWR */ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c index 1007ec36b4cb..5a2d8c306c40 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -133,9 +133,9 @@ int hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(struct perf_event *bp, const struct perf_event_attr *attr, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *hw) { - int ret = -EINVAL, length_max; + int ret = -EINVAL; - if (!bp) + if (!bp || !attr->bp_len) return ret; hw->type = HW_BRK_TYPE_TRANSLATE; @@ -155,26 +155,10 @@ int hw_breakpoint_arch_parse(struct perf_event *bp, hw->address = attr->bp_addr; hw->len = attr->bp_len; - /* - * Since breakpoint length can be a maximum of HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN(8) - * and breakpoint addresses are aligned to nearest double-word - * HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN by rounding off to the lower address, the - * 'symbolsize' should satisfy the check below. - */ if (!ppc_breakpoint_available()) return -ENODEV; - length_max = 8; /* DABR */ - if (dawr_enabled()) { - length_max = 512 ; /* 64 doublewords */ - /* DAWR region can't cross 512 boundary */ - if ((attr->bp_addr >> 9) != - ((attr->bp_addr + attr->bp_len - 1) >> 9)) - return -EINVAL; - } - if (hw->len > - (length_max - (hw->address & HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN))) - return -EINVAL; - return 0; + + return hw_breakpoint_validate_len(hw); } /* diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c index 639ceae7da9d..c4fcb7d7a72d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c @@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ static void set_debug_reg_defaults(struct thread_struct *thread) { thread->hw_brk.address = 0; thread->hw_brk.type = 0; + thread->hw_brk.len = 0; + thread->hw_brk.hw_len = 0; if (ppc_breakpoint_available()) set_breakpoint(&thread->hw_brk); } @@ -780,6 +782,49 @@ static inline int set_dabr(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk) return __set_dabr(dabr, dabrx); } +/* + * Watchpoint match range is always doubleword(8 bytes) aligned on + * powerpc. If the given range is crossing doubleword boundary, we + * need to increase the length such that next doubleword also get + * covered. Ex, + * + * address len = 6 bytes + * |=========. + * |------------v--|------v--------| + * | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | + * |---------------|---------------| + * <---8 bytes---> + * + * In this case, we should configure hw as: + * start_addr = address & ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN + * len = 16 bytes + * + * @start_addr and @end_addr are inclusive. + */ +int hw_breakpoint_validate_len(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *hw) +{ + u16 max_len = DABR_MAX_LEN; + u16 hw_len; + unsigned long start_addr, end_addr; + + start_addr = hw->address & ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN; + end_addr = (hw->address + hw->len - 1) | HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN; + hw_len = end_addr - start_addr + 1; + + if (dawr_enabled()) { + max_len = DAWR_MAX_LEN; + /* DAWR region can't cross 512 bytes boundary */ + if ((start_addr >> 9) != (end_addr >> 9)) + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (hw_len > max_len) + return -EINVAL; + + hw->hw_len = hw_len; + return 0; +} + void __set_breakpoint(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk) { memcpy(this_cpu_ptr(¤t_brk), brk, sizeof(*brk)); @@ -816,6 +861,7 @@ static inline bool hw_brk_match(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *a, return false; if (a->len != b->len) return false; + /* no need to check hw_len. it's calculated from address and len */ return true; } diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c index 8c92febf5f44..22a68f21cdf9 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -2425,7 +2425,8 @@ static int ptrace_set_debugreg(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long addr, return -EIO; hw_brk.address = data & (~HW_BRK_TYPE_DABR); hw_brk.type = (data & HW_BRK_TYPE_DABR) | HW_BRK_TYPE_PRIV_ALL; - hw_brk.len = 8; + hw_brk.len = DABR_MAX_LEN; + hw_brk.hw_len = DABR_MAX_LEN; set_bp = (data) && (hw_brk.type & HW_BRK_TYPE_RDWR); #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT bp = thread->ptrace_bps[0]; @@ -2439,6 +2440,7 @@ static int ptrace_set_debugreg(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long addr, if (bp) { attr = bp->attr; attr.bp_addr = hw_brk.address; + attr.bp_len = DABR_MAX_LEN; arch_bp_generic_fields(hw_brk.type, &attr.bp_type); /* Enable breakpoint */ @@ -2456,7 +2458,7 @@ static int ptrace_set_debugreg(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long addr, /* Create a new breakpoint request if one doesn't exist already */ hw_breakpoint_init(&attr); attr.bp_addr = hw_brk.address; - attr.bp_len = 8; + attr.bp_len = DABR_MAX_LEN; arch_bp_generic_fields(hw_brk.type, &attr.bp_type); @@ -2826,13 +2828,13 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, struct ppc_hw_breakpoint *bp_info) { #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT - int len = 0; struct thread_struct *thread = &(child->thread); struct perf_event *bp; struct perf_event_attr attr; #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT */ #ifndef CONFIG_PPC_ADV_DEBUG_REGS struct arch_hw_breakpoint brk; + int ret = 0; #endif if (bp_info->version != 1) @@ -2880,32 +2882,33 @@ static long ppc_set_hwdebug(struct task_struct *child, if ((unsigned long)bp_info->addr >= TASK_SIZE) return -EIO; - brk.address = bp_info->addr & ~7UL; + brk.address = bp_info->addr; brk.type = HW_BRK_TYPE_TRANSLATE; - brk.len = 8; + + if (bp_info->addr_mode == PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE) + brk.len = bp_info->addr2 - bp_info->addr; + else if (bp_info->addr_mode == PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT) + brk.len = 1; + else + return -EINVAL; + + ret = hw_breakpoint_validate_len(&brk); + if (ret) + return ret; + if (bp_info->trigger_type & PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_READ) brk.type |= HW_BRK_TYPE_READ; if (bp_info->trigger_type & PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE) brk.type |= HW_BRK_TYPE_WRITE; #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT - /* - * Check if the request is for 'range' breakpoints. We can - * support it if range < 8 bytes. - */ - if (bp_info->addr_mode == PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE) - len = bp_info->addr2 - bp_info->addr; - else if (bp_info->addr_mode == PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT) - len = 1; - else - return -EINVAL; bp = thread->ptrace_bps[0]; if (bp) return -ENOSPC; /* Create a new breakpoint request if one doesn't exist already */ hw_breakpoint_init(&attr); - attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)bp_info->addr & ~HW_BREAKPOINT_ALIGN; - attr.bp_len = len; + attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)bp_info->addr; + attr.bp_len = brk.len; arch_bp_generic_fields(brk.type, &attr.bp_type); thread->ptrace_bps[0] = bp = register_user_hw_breakpoint(&attr, diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c index d83364ebc5c5..e8a18d725c5e 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c @@ -884,7 +884,8 @@ static void insert_cpu_bpts(void) if (dabr.enabled) { brk.address = dabr.address; brk.type = (dabr.enabled & HW_BRK_TYPE_DABR) | HW_BRK_TYPE_PRIV_ALL; - brk.len = 8; + brk.len = DABR_MAX_LEN; + brk.hw_len = DABR_MAX_LEN; __set_breakpoint(&brk); } -- 2.21.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Don't ignore extraneous exceptions blindly 2019-09-25 4:06 [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Fix length calculation for unaligned target Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-09-25 4:06 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Rewrite ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest Ravi Bangoria ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-09-25 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mpe, mikey, christophe.leroy Cc: Ravi Bangoria, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev On Powerpc, watchpoint match range is double-word granular. On a watchpoint hit, DAR is set to the first byte of overlap between actual access and watched range. And thus it's quite possible that DAR does not point inside user specified range. Ex, say user creates a watchpoint with address range 0x1004 to 0x1007. So hw would be configured to watch from 0x1000 to 0x1007. If there is a 4 byte access from 0x1002 to 0x1005, DAR will point to 0x1002 and thus interrupt handler considers it as extraneous, but it's actually not, because part of the access belongs to what user has asked. Instead of blindly ignoring the exception, get actual address range by analysing an instruction, and ignore only if actual range does not overlap with user specified range. Note: The behaviour is unchanged for 8xx. Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> --- arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c index 5a2d8c306c40..c04a345e2cc2 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -179,33 +179,49 @@ void thread_change_pc(struct task_struct *tsk, struct pt_regs *regs) tsk->thread.last_hit_ubp = NULL; } -static bool is_larx_stcx_instr(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int instr) +static bool dar_within_range(unsigned long dar, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) { - int ret, type; - struct instruction_op op; + return ((info->address <= dar) && (dar - info->address < info->len)); +} - ret = analyse_instr(&op, regs, instr); - type = GETTYPE(op.type); - return (!ret && (type == LARX || type == STCX)); +static bool +dar_range_overlaps(unsigned long dar, int size, struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) +{ + return ((dar <= info->address + info->len - 1) && + (dar + size - 1 >= info->address)); } /* * Handle debug exception notifications. */ static bool stepping_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, struct perf_event *bp, - unsigned long addr) + struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info) { unsigned int instr = 0; + int ret, type, size; + struct instruction_op op; + unsigned long addr = info->address; if (__get_user_inatomic(instr, (unsigned int *)regs->nip)) goto fail; - if (is_larx_stcx_instr(regs, instr)) { + ret = analyse_instr(&op, regs, instr); + type = GETTYPE(op.type); + size = GETSIZE(op.type); + + if (!ret && (type == LARX || type == STCX)) { printk_ratelimited("Breakpoint hit on instruction that can't be emulated." " Breakpoint at 0x%lx will be disabled.\n", addr); goto disable; } + /* + * If it's extraneous event, we still need to emulate/single- + * step the instruction, but we don't generate an event. + */ + if (size && !dar_range_overlaps(regs->dar, size, info)) + info->type |= HW_BRK_TYPE_EXTRANEOUS_IRQ; + /* Do not emulate user-space instructions, instead single-step them */ if (user_mode(regs)) { current->thread.last_hit_ubp = bp; @@ -237,7 +253,6 @@ int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args) struct perf_event *bp; struct pt_regs *regs = args->regs; struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info; - unsigned long dar = regs->dar; /* Disable breakpoints during exception handling */ hw_breakpoint_disable(); @@ -269,19 +284,14 @@ int hw_breakpoint_handler(struct die_args *args) goto out; } - /* - * Verify if dar lies within the address range occupied by the symbol - * being watched to filter extraneous exceptions. If it doesn't, - * we still need to single-step the instruction, but we don't - * generate an event. - */ info->type &= ~HW_BRK_TYPE_EXTRANEOUS_IRQ; - if (!((bp->attr.bp_addr <= dar) && - (dar - bp->attr.bp_addr < bp->attr.bp_len))) - info->type |= HW_BRK_TYPE_EXTRANEOUS_IRQ; - - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx) && !stepping_handler(regs, bp, info->address)) - goto out; + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_8xx)) { + if (!dar_within_range(regs->dar, info)) + info->type |= HW_BRK_TYPE_EXTRANEOUS_IRQ; + } else { + if (!stepping_handler(regs, bp, info)) + goto out; + } /* * As a policy, the callback is invoked in a 'trigger-after-execute' -- 2.21.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Rewrite ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest 2019-09-25 4:06 [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Fix length calculation for unaligned target Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Don't ignore extraneous exceptions blindly Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-09-25 4:06 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Add dar outside test in perf-hwbreak.c selftest Ravi Bangoria ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-09-25 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mpe, mikey, christophe.leroy Cc: Ravi Bangoria, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest is logically broken. On powerpc, when watchpoint is created with ptrace, signals are generated before executing the instruction and user has to manually singlestep the instruction with watchpoint disabled, which selftest never does and thus it keeps on getting the signal at the same instruction. If we fix it, selftest fails because the logical connection between tracer(parent) and tracee(child) is also broken. Rewrite the selftest and add new tests for unaligned access. With patch: $ ./tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak test: ptrace-hwbreak tags: git_version:powerpc-5.3-4-224-g218b868240c7-dirty PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RW, len: 6: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, RW, len: 6: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, DAR OUTSIDE, RW, len: 6: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, DAWR_MAX_LEN, RW, len: 512: Ok success: ptrace-hwbreak Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> --- .../selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak.c | 571 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 361 insertions(+), 210 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak.c index 3066d310f32b..654131591fca 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak.c @@ -22,318 +22,469 @@ #include <sys/wait.h> #include "ptrace.h" -/* Breakpoint access modes */ -enum { - BP_X = 1, - BP_RW = 2, - BP_W = 4, -}; - -static pid_t child_pid; -static struct ppc_debug_info dbginfo; - -static void get_dbginfo(void) -{ - int ret; - - ret = ptrace(PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, child_pid, NULL, &dbginfo); - if (ret) { - perror("Can't get breakpoint info\n"); - exit(-1); - } -} - -static bool hwbreak_present(void) -{ - return (dbginfo.num_data_bps != 0); -} +/* + * Use volatile on all global var so that compiler doesn't + * optimise their load/stores. Otherwise selftest can fail. + */ +static volatile __u64 glvar; -static bool dawr_present(void) -{ - return !!(dbginfo.features & PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_DAWR); -} +#define DAWR_MAX_LEN 512 +static volatile __u8 big_var[DAWR_MAX_LEN] __attribute__((aligned(512))); -static void set_breakpoint_addr(void *addr) -{ - int ret; +#define A_LEN 6 +#define B_LEN 6 +struct gstruct { + __u8 a[A_LEN]; /* double word aligned */ + __u8 b[B_LEN]; /* double word unaligned */ +}; +static volatile struct gstruct gstruct __attribute__((aligned(512))); - ret = ptrace(PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, child_pid, 0, addr); - if (ret) { - perror("Can't set breakpoint addr\n"); - exit(-1); - } -} -static int set_hwbreakpoint_addr(void *addr, int range) +static void get_dbginfo(pid_t child_pid, struct ppc_debug_info *dbginfo) { - int ret; - - struct ppc_hw_breakpoint info; - - info.version = 1; - info.trigger_type = PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW; - info.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT; - if (range > 0) - info.addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; - info.condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; - info.addr = (__u64)addr; - info.addr2 = (__u64)addr + range; - info.condition_value = 0; - - ret = ptrace(PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, child_pid, 0, &info); - if (ret < 0) { - perror("Can't set breakpoint\n"); + if (ptrace(PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, child_pid, NULL, dbginfo)) { + perror("Can't get breakpoint info"); exit(-1); } - return ret; } -static int del_hwbreakpoint_addr(int watchpoint_handle) +static bool dawr_present(struct ppc_debug_info *dbginfo) { - int ret; - - ret = ptrace(PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG, child_pid, 0, watchpoint_handle); - if (ret < 0) { - perror("Can't delete hw breakpoint\n"); - exit(-1); - } - return ret; + return !!(dbginfo->features & PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_DAWR); } -#define DAWR_LENGTH_MAX 512 - -/* Dummy variables to test read/write accesses */ -static unsigned long long - dummy_array[DAWR_LENGTH_MAX / sizeof(unsigned long long)] - __attribute__((aligned(512))); -static unsigned long long *dummy_var = dummy_array; - static void write_var(int len) { - long long *plval; - char *pcval; - short *psval; - int *pival; + __u8 *pcvar; + __u16 *psvar; + __u32 *pivar; + __u64 *plvar; switch (len) { case 1: - pcval = (char *)dummy_var; - *pcval = 0xff; + pcvar = (__u8 *)&glvar; + *pcvar = 0xff; break; case 2: - psval = (short *)dummy_var; - *psval = 0xffff; + psvar = (__u16 *)&glvar; + *psvar = 0xffff; break; case 4: - pival = (int *)dummy_var; - *pival = 0xffffffff; + pivar = (__u32 *)&glvar; + *pivar = 0xffffffff; break; case 8: - plval = (long long *)dummy_var; - *plval = 0xffffffffffffffffLL; + plvar = (__u64 *)&glvar; + *plvar = 0xffffffffffffffffLL; break; } } static void read_var(int len) { - char cval __attribute__((unused)); - short sval __attribute__((unused)); - int ival __attribute__((unused)); - long long lval __attribute__((unused)); + __u8 cvar __attribute__((unused)); + __u16 svar __attribute__((unused)); + __u32 ivar __attribute__((unused)); + __u64 lvar __attribute__((unused)); switch (len) { case 1: - cval = *(char *)dummy_var; + cvar = (__u8)glvar; break; case 2: - sval = *(short *)dummy_var; + svar = (__u16)glvar; break; case 4: - ival = *(int *)dummy_var; + ivar = (__u32)glvar; break; case 8: - lval = *(long long *)dummy_var; + lvar = (__u64)glvar; break; } } -/* - * Do the r/w accesses to trigger the breakpoints. And run - * the usual traps. - */ -static void trigger_tests(void) +static void test_workload(void) { - int len, ret; + __u8 cvar __attribute__((unused)); + __u32 ivar __attribute__((unused)); + int len = 0; - ret = ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, 0); - if (ret) { - perror("Can't be traced?\n"); - return; + if (ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, NULL, 0)) { + perror("Child can't be traced?"); + exit(-1); } /* Wake up father so that it sets up the first test */ kill(getpid(), SIGUSR1); - /* Test write watchpoints */ - for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(long); len <<= 1) + /* PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO test */ + for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(glvar); len <<= 1) write_var(len); - /* Test read/write watchpoints (on read accesses) */ - for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(long); len <<= 1) + /* PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO test */ + for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(glvar); len <<= 1) read_var(len); - /* Test when breakpoint is unset */ - - /* Test write watchpoints */ - for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(long); len <<= 1) - write_var(len); + /* PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW test */ + for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(glvar); len <<= 1) { + if (rand() % 2) + read_var(len); + else + write_var(len); + } - /* Test read/write watchpoints (on read accesses) */ - for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(long); len <<= 1) - read_var(len); + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO test */ + write_var(1); + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO test */ + read_var(1); + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW test */ + if (rand() % 2) + write_var(1); + else + read_var(1); + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO test */ + gstruct.a[rand() % A_LEN] = 'a'; + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO test */ + cvar = gstruct.a[rand() % A_LEN]; + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RW test */ + if (rand() % 2) + gstruct.a[rand() % A_LEN] = 'a'; + else + cvar = gstruct.a[rand() % A_LEN]; + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, WO test */ + gstruct.b[rand() % B_LEN] = 'b'; + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, RO test */ + cvar = gstruct.b[rand() % B_LEN]; + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, RW test */ + if (rand() % 2) + gstruct.b[rand() % B_LEN] = 'b'; + else + cvar = gstruct.b[rand() % B_LEN]; + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, DAR OUTSIDE, RW test */ + if (rand() % 2) + *((int *)(gstruct.a + 4)) = 10; + else + ivar = *((int *)(gstruct.a + 4)); + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG. DAWR_MAX_LEN. RW test */ + if (rand() % 2) + big_var[rand() % DAWR_MAX_LEN] = 'a'; + else + cvar = big_var[rand() % DAWR_MAX_LEN]; } -static void check_success(const char *msg) +static void check_success(pid_t child_pid, const char *name, const char *type, + unsigned long saddr, int len) { - const char *msg2; int status; + siginfo_t siginfo; + unsigned long eaddr = (saddr + len - 1) | 0x7; + + saddr &= ~0x7; /* Wait for the child to SIGTRAP */ wait(&status); - msg2 = "Failed"; + ptrace(PTRACE_GETSIGINFO, child_pid, NULL, &siginfo); - if (WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGTRAP) { - msg2 = "Child process hit the breakpoint"; + if (!WIFSTOPPED(status) || WSTOPSIG(status) != SIGTRAP || + (unsigned long)siginfo.si_addr < saddr || + (unsigned long)siginfo.si_addr > eaddr) { + printf("%s, %s, len: %d: Fail\n", name, type, len); + exit(-1); } - printf("%s Result: [%s]\n", msg, msg2); + printf("%s, %s, len: %d: Ok\n", name, type, len); + + /* + * For ptrace registered watchpoint, signal is generated + * before executing load/store. Singlestep the instruction + * and then continue the test. + */ + ptrace(PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, child_pid, NULL, 0); + wait(NULL); } -static void launch_watchpoints(char *buf, int mode, int len, - struct ppc_debug_info *dbginfo, bool dawr) +static void ptrace_set_debugreg(pid_t child_pid, unsigned long wp_addr) { - const char *mode_str; - unsigned long data = (unsigned long)(dummy_var); - int wh, range; - - data &= ~0x7UL; - - if (mode == BP_W) { - data |= (1UL << 1); - mode_str = "write"; - } else { - data |= (1UL << 0); - data |= (1UL << 1); - mode_str = "read"; + if (ptrace(PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, child_pid, 0, wp_addr)) { + perror("PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG failed"); + exit(-1); } +} - /* Set DABR_TRANSLATION bit */ - data |= (1UL << 2); - - /* use PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG breakpoints */ - set_breakpoint_addr((void *)data); - ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); - sprintf(buf, "Test %s watchpoint with len: %d ", mode_str, len); - check_success(buf); - /* Unregister hw brkpoint */ - set_breakpoint_addr(NULL); +static int ptrace_sethwdebug(pid_t child_pid, struct ppc_hw_breakpoint *info) +{ + int wh = ptrace(PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, child_pid, 0, info); - data = (data & ~7); /* remove dabr control bits */ + if (wh <= 0) { + perror("PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG failed"); + exit(-1); + } + return wh; +} - /* use PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG breakpoint */ - if (!(dbginfo->features & PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_RANGE)) - return; /* not supported */ - wh = set_hwbreakpoint_addr((void *)data, 0); - ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); - sprintf(buf, "Test %s watchpoint with len: %d ", mode_str, len); - check_success(buf); - /* Unregister hw brkpoint */ - del_hwbreakpoint_addr(wh); - - /* try a wider range */ - range = 8; - if (dawr) - range = 512 - ((int)data & (DAWR_LENGTH_MAX - 1)); - wh = set_hwbreakpoint_addr((void *)data, range); - ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); - sprintf(buf, "Test %s watchpoint with len: %d ", mode_str, len); - check_success(buf); - /* Unregister hw brkpoint */ - del_hwbreakpoint_addr(wh); +static void ptrace_delhwdebug(pid_t child_pid, int wh) +{ + if (ptrace(PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG, child_pid, 0, wh) < 0) { + perror("PPC_PTRACE_DELHWDEBUG failed"); + exit(-1); + } } -/* Set the breakpoints and check the child successfully trigger them */ -static int launch_tests(bool dawr) +#define DABR_READ_SHIFT 0 +#define DABR_WRITE_SHIFT 1 +#define DABR_TRANSLATION_SHIFT 2 + +static int test_set_debugreg(pid_t child_pid) { - char buf[1024]; - int len, i, status; + unsigned long wp_addr = (unsigned long)&glvar; + char *name = "PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG"; + int len; + + /* PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO test*/ + wp_addr &= ~0x7UL; + wp_addr |= (1UL << DABR_WRITE_SHIFT); + wp_addr |= (1UL << DABR_TRANSLATION_SHIFT); + for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(glvar); len <<= 1) { + ptrace_set_debugreg(child_pid, wp_addr); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "WO", wp_addr, len); + } - struct ppc_debug_info dbginfo; + /* PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO test */ + wp_addr &= ~0x7UL; + wp_addr |= (1UL << DABR_READ_SHIFT); + wp_addr |= (1UL << DABR_TRANSLATION_SHIFT); + for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(glvar); len <<= 1) { + ptrace_set_debugreg(child_pid, wp_addr); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "RO", wp_addr, len); + } - i = ptrace(PPC_PTRACE_GETHWDBGINFO, child_pid, NULL, &dbginfo); - if (i) { - perror("Can't set breakpoint info\n"); - exit(-1); + /* PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW test */ + wp_addr &= ~0x7UL; + wp_addr |= (1Ul << DABR_READ_SHIFT); + wp_addr |= (1UL << DABR_WRITE_SHIFT); + wp_addr |= (1UL << DABR_TRANSLATION_SHIFT); + for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(glvar); len <<= 1) { + ptrace_set_debugreg(child_pid, wp_addr); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "RW", wp_addr, len); } - if (!(dbginfo.features & PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_RANGE)) - printf("WARNING: Kernel doesn't support PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG\n"); - /* Write watchpoint */ - for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(long); len <<= 1) - launch_watchpoints(buf, BP_W, len, &dbginfo, dawr); + ptrace_set_debugreg(child_pid, 0); + return 0; +} - /* Read-Write watchpoint */ - for (len = 1; len <= sizeof(long); len <<= 1) - launch_watchpoints(buf, BP_RW, len, &dbginfo, dawr); +static void get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(struct ppc_hw_breakpoint *info, int type, + unsigned long addr, int len) +{ + info->version = 1; + info->trigger_type = type; + info->condition_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_CONDITION_NONE; + info->addr = (__u64)addr; + info->addr2 = (__u64)addr + len; + info->condition_value = 0; + if (!len) + info->addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_EXACT; + else + info->addr_mode = PPC_BREAKPOINT_MODE_RANGE_INCLUSIVE; +} +static void test_sethwdebug_exact(pid_t child_pid) +{ + struct ppc_hw_breakpoint info; + unsigned long wp_addr = (unsigned long)&glvar; + char *name = "PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT"; + int len = 1; /* hardcoded in kernel */ + int wh; + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO test */ + get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(&info, PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE, wp_addr, 0); + wh = ptrace_sethwdebug(child_pid, &info); ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "WO", wp_addr, len); + ptrace_delhwdebug(child_pid, wh); - /* - * Now we have unregistered the breakpoint, access by child - * should not cause SIGTRAP. - */ + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO test */ + get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(&info, PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_READ, wp_addr, 0); + wh = ptrace_sethwdebug(child_pid, &info); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "RO", wp_addr, len); + ptrace_delhwdebug(child_pid, wh); - wait(&status); + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW test */ + get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(&info, PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW, wp_addr, 0); + wh = ptrace_sethwdebug(child_pid, &info); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "RW", wp_addr, len); + ptrace_delhwdebug(child_pid, wh); +} - if (WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGTRAP) { - printf("FAIL: Child process hit the breakpoint, which is not expected\n"); - ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); - return TEST_FAIL; - } +static void test_sethwdebug_range_aligned(pid_t child_pid) +{ + struct ppc_hw_breakpoint info; + unsigned long wp_addr; + char *name = "PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED"; + int len; + int wh; + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO test */ + wp_addr = (unsigned long)&gstruct.a; + len = A_LEN; + get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(&info, PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE, wp_addr, len); + wh = ptrace_sethwdebug(child_pid, &info); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "WO", wp_addr, len); + ptrace_delhwdebug(child_pid, wh); + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO test */ + wp_addr = (unsigned long)&gstruct.a; + len = A_LEN; + get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(&info, PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_READ, wp_addr, len); + wh = ptrace_sethwdebug(child_pid, &info); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "RO", wp_addr, len); + ptrace_delhwdebug(child_pid, wh); + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RW test */ + wp_addr = (unsigned long)&gstruct.a; + len = A_LEN; + get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(&info, PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW, wp_addr, len); + wh = ptrace_sethwdebug(child_pid, &info); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "RW", wp_addr, len); + ptrace_delhwdebug(child_pid, wh); +} - if (WIFEXITED(status)) - printf("Child exited normally\n"); +static void test_sethwdebug_range_unaligned(pid_t child_pid) +{ + struct ppc_hw_breakpoint info; + unsigned long wp_addr; + char *name = "PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED"; + int len; + int wh; + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, WO test */ + wp_addr = (unsigned long)&gstruct.b; + len = B_LEN; + get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(&info, PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE, wp_addr, len); + wh = ptrace_sethwdebug(child_pid, &info); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "WO", wp_addr, len); + ptrace_delhwdebug(child_pid, wh); + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, RO test */ + wp_addr = (unsigned long)&gstruct.b; + len = B_LEN; + get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(&info, PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_READ, wp_addr, len); + wh = ptrace_sethwdebug(child_pid, &info); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "RO", wp_addr, len); + ptrace_delhwdebug(child_pid, wh); + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, RW test */ + wp_addr = (unsigned long)&gstruct.b; + len = B_LEN; + get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(&info, PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW, wp_addr, len); + wh = ptrace_sethwdebug(child_pid, &info); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "RW", wp_addr, len); + ptrace_delhwdebug(child_pid, wh); - return TEST_PASS; +} + +static void test_sethwdebug_range_unaligned_dar(pid_t child_pid) +{ + struct ppc_hw_breakpoint info; + unsigned long wp_addr; + char *name = "PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, DAR OUTSIDE"; + int len; + int wh; + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW UNALIGNED, DAR OUTSIDE, RW test */ + wp_addr = (unsigned long)&gstruct.b; + len = B_LEN; + get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(&info, PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_WRITE, wp_addr, len); + wh = ptrace_sethwdebug(child_pid, &info); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "RW", wp_addr, len); + ptrace_delhwdebug(child_pid, wh); +} + +static void test_sethwdebug_dawr_max_range(pid_t child_pid) +{ + struct ppc_hw_breakpoint info; + unsigned long wp_addr; + char *name = "PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, DAWR_MAX_LEN"; + int len; + int wh; + + /* PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, DAWR_MAX_LEN, RW test */ + wp_addr = (unsigned long)big_var; + len = DAWR_MAX_LEN; + get_ppc_hw_breakpoint(&info, PPC_BREAKPOINT_TRIGGER_RW, wp_addr, len); + wh = ptrace_sethwdebug(child_pid, &info); + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); + check_success(child_pid, name, "RW", wp_addr, len); + ptrace_delhwdebug(child_pid, wh); +} + +/* Set the breakpoints and check the child successfully trigger them */ +static void +run_tests(pid_t child_pid, struct ppc_debug_info *dbginfo, bool dawr) +{ + test_set_debugreg(child_pid); + if (dbginfo->features & PPC_DEBUG_FEATURE_DATA_BP_RANGE) { + test_sethwdebug_exact(child_pid); + test_sethwdebug_range_aligned(child_pid); + test_sethwdebug_range_unaligned(child_pid); + test_sethwdebug_range_unaligned_dar(child_pid); + + if (dawr) + test_sethwdebug_dawr_max_range(child_pid); + } } static int ptrace_hwbreak(void) { - pid_t pid; - int ret; + pid_t child_pid; + struct ppc_debug_info dbginfo; bool dawr; - pid = fork(); - if (!pid) { - trigger_tests(); + child_pid = fork(); + if (!child_pid) { + test_workload(); return 0; } wait(NULL); - child_pid = pid; - - get_dbginfo(); - SKIP_IF(!hwbreak_present()); - dawr = dawr_present(); + get_dbginfo(child_pid, &dbginfo); + SKIP_IF(dbginfo.num_data_bps == 0); - ret = launch_tests(dawr); + dawr = dawr_present(&dbginfo); + run_tests(child_pid, &dbginfo, dawr); + /* Let the child exit first. */ + ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child_pid, NULL, 0); wait(NULL); - return ret; + /* + * Testcases exits immediately with -1 on any failure. If + * it has reached here, it means all tests were successful. + */ + return TEST_PASS; } int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) -- 2.21.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 4/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Add dar outside test in perf-hwbreak.c selftest 2019-09-25 4:06 [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes Ravi Bangoria ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Rewrite ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-09-25 4:06 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Support for 8xx in ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-07 6:35 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes Ravi Bangoria 5 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-09-25 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mpe, mikey, christophe.leroy Cc: Ravi Bangoria, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev So far we used to ignore exception if dar points outside of user specified range. But now we are ignoring it only if actual load/ store range does not overlap with user specified range. Include selftests for the same: # ./tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/perf-hwbreak ... TESTED: No overlap TESTED: Partial overlap TESTED: Partial overlap TESTED: No overlap TESTED: Full overlap success: perf_hwbreak Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> --- .../selftests/powerpc/ptrace/perf-hwbreak.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/perf-hwbreak.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/perf-hwbreak.c index 200337daec42..389c545675c6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/perf-hwbreak.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/perf-hwbreak.c @@ -148,6 +148,113 @@ static int runtestsingle(int readwriteflag, int exclude_user, int arraytest) return 0; } +static int runtest_dar_outside(void) +{ + volatile char target[8]; + volatile __u16 temp16; + volatile __u64 temp64; + struct perf_event_attr attr; + int break_fd; + unsigned long long breaks; + int fail = 0; + size_t res; + + /* setup counters */ + memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr)); + attr.disabled = 1; + attr.type = PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT; + attr.exclude_kernel = 1; + attr.exclude_hv = 1; + attr.exclude_guest = 1; + attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_RW; + /* watch middle half of target array */ + attr.bp_addr = (__u64)(target + 2); + attr.bp_len = 4; + break_fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0); + if (break_fd < 0) { + perror("sys_perf_event_open"); + exit(1); + } + + /* Shouldn't hit. */ + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_RESET); + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE); + temp16 = *((__u16 *)target); + *((__u16 *)target) = temp16; + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE); + res = read(break_fd, &breaks, sizeof(unsigned long long)); + assert(res == sizeof(unsigned long long)); + if (breaks == 0) { + printf("TESTED: No overlap\n"); + } else { + printf("FAILED: No overlap: %lld != 0\n", breaks); + fail = 1; + } + + /* Hit */ + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_RESET); + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE); + temp16 = *((__u16 *)(target + 1)); + *((__u16 *)(target + 1)) = temp16; + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE); + res = read(break_fd, &breaks, sizeof(unsigned long long)); + assert(res == sizeof(unsigned long long)); + if (breaks == 2) { + printf("TESTED: Partial overlap\n"); + } else { + printf("FAILED: Partial overlap: %lld != 2\n", breaks); + fail = 1; + } + + /* Hit */ + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_RESET); + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE); + temp16 = *((__u16 *)(target + 5)); + *((__u16 *)(target + 5)) = temp16; + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE); + res = read(break_fd, &breaks, sizeof(unsigned long long)); + assert(res == sizeof(unsigned long long)); + if (breaks == 2) { + printf("TESTED: Partial overlap\n"); + } else { + printf("FAILED: Partial overlap: %lld != 2\n", breaks); + fail = 1; + } + + /* Shouldn't Hit */ + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_RESET); + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE); + temp16 = *((__u16 *)(target + 6)); + *((__u16 *)(target + 6)) = temp16; + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE); + res = read(break_fd, &breaks, sizeof(unsigned long long)); + assert(res == sizeof(unsigned long long)); + if (breaks == 0) { + printf("TESTED: No overlap\n"); + } else { + printf("FAILED: No overlap: %lld != 0\n", breaks); + fail = 1; + } + + /* Hit */ + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_RESET); + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE); + temp64 = *((__u64 *)target); + *((__u64 *)target) = temp64; + ioctl(break_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE); + res = read(break_fd, &breaks, sizeof(unsigned long long)); + assert(res == sizeof(unsigned long long)); + if (breaks == 2) { + printf("TESTED: Full overlap\n"); + } else { + printf("FAILED: Full overlap: %lld != 2\n", breaks); + fail = 1; + } + + close(break_fd); + return fail; +} + static int runtest(void) { int rwflag; @@ -172,7 +279,9 @@ static int runtest(void) return ret; } } - return 0; + + ret = runtest_dar_outside(); + return ret; } -- 2.21.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 5/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Support for 8xx in ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest 2019-09-25 4:06 [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes Ravi Bangoria ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Add dar outside test in perf-hwbreak.c selftest Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-09-25 4:06 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-07 6:35 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes Ravi Bangoria 5 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-09-25 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mpe, mikey, christophe.leroy Cc: Ravi Bangoria, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev On the 8xx, signals are generated after executing the instruction. So no need to manually single-step on 8xx. Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> --- .../selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak.c | 26 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak.c index 654131591fca..58505277346d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/ptrace/ptrace-hwbreak.c @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ #include <sys/wait.h> #include "ptrace.h" +#define SPRN_PVR 0x11F +#define PVR_8xx 0x00500000 + +bool is_8xx; + /* * Use volatile on all global var so that compiler doesn't * optimise their load/stores. Otherwise selftest can fail. @@ -205,13 +210,15 @@ static void check_success(pid_t child_pid, const char *name, const char *type, printf("%s, %s, len: %d: Ok\n", name, type, len); - /* - * For ptrace registered watchpoint, signal is generated - * before executing load/store. Singlestep the instruction - * and then continue the test. - */ - ptrace(PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, child_pid, NULL, 0); - wait(NULL); + if (!is_8xx) { + /* + * For ptrace registered watchpoint, signal is generated + * before executing load/store. Singlestep the instruction + * and then continue the test. + */ + ptrace(PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, child_pid, NULL, 0); + wait(NULL); + } } static void ptrace_set_debugreg(pid_t child_pid, unsigned long wp_addr) @@ -489,5 +496,10 @@ static int ptrace_hwbreak(void) int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) { + int pvr = 0; + asm __volatile__ ("mfspr %0,%1" : "=r"(pvr) : "i"(SPRN_PVR)); + if (pvr == PVR_8xx) + is_8xx = true; + return test_harness(ptrace_hwbreak, "ptrace-hwbreak"); } -- 2.21.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes 2019-09-25 4:06 [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes Ravi Bangoria ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Support for 8xx in ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-10-07 6:35 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-09 13:37 ` Christophe Leroy 5 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-10-07 6:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: mpe, mikey, christophe.leroy Cc: Ravi Bangoria, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev On 9/25/19 9:36 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote: > v3: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2019-July/193339.html > > v3->v4: > - Instead of considering exception as extraneous when dar is outside of > user specified range, analyse the instruction and check for overlap > between user specified range and actual load/store range. > - Add selftest for the same in perf-hwbreak.c > - Make ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest more strict by checking address in > check_success. > - Support for 8xx in ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest (Build tested only) > - Rebase to powerpc/next > > @Christope, Can you please check Patch 5. I've just build-tested it > with ep88xc_defconfig. @mpe, @mikey, Any feedback? @Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx? Thanks, Ravi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes 2019-10-07 6:35 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-10-09 13:37 ` Christophe Leroy 2019-10-10 4:44 ` Ravi Bangoria 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy @ 2019-10-09 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ravi Bangoria, mpe, mikey Cc: linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev Le 07/10/2019 à 08:35, Ravi Bangoria a écrit : > > > On 9/25/19 9:36 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote: >> v3: https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2019-July/193339.html >> >> v3->v4: >> - Instead of considering exception as extraneous when dar is outside of >> user specified range, analyse the instruction and check for overlap >> between user specified range and actual load/store range. >> - Add selftest for the same in perf-hwbreak.c >> - Make ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest more strict by checking address in >> check_success. >> - Support for 8xx in ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest (Build tested only) >> - Rebase to powerpc/next >> >> @Christope, Can you please check Patch 5. I've just build-tested it >> with ep88xc_defconfig. > > @mpe, @mikey, Any feedback? > > @Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx? > Getting the following : root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak test: ptrace-hwbreak tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Fail failure: ptrace-hwbreak Christophe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes 2019-10-09 13:37 ` Christophe Leroy @ 2019-10-10 4:44 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-10 6:25 ` Ravi Bangoria ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-10-10 4:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Ravi Bangoria, mikey, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev >> @Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx? >> > > Getting the following : > > root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak > test: ptrace-hwbreak > tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Fail > failure: ptrace-hwbreak > Thanks Christophe. I don't have any 8xx box. I checked qemu and it seems qemu emulation for 8xx is not yet supported. So I can't debug this. Can you please check why it's failing? -Ravi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes 2019-10-10 4:44 ` Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-10-10 6:25 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-12 7:31 ` Christophe Leroy 2019-10-10 9:30 ` Christophe Leroy 2019-10-12 8:51 ` Christophe Leroy 2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-10-10 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Ravi Bangoria, mikey, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev On 10/10/19 10:14 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote: > >>> @Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx? >>> >> >> Getting the following : >> >> root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak >> test: ptrace-hwbreak >> tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Fail >> failure: ptrace-hwbreak >> > > Thanks Christophe. I don't have any 8xx box. I checked qemu and it seems > qemu emulation for 8xx is not yet supported. So I can't debug this. Can > you please check why it's failing? PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG internally uses DAWR register and probably 8xx does not emulate DAWR logic, it only uses DABR to emulate double-word watchpoint. In that case, all testcases that uses PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG should be disabled for 8xx. I'll change [PATCH 5] accordingly and resend. Also, do you think I should fix hw_breakpoint_validate_len() from [PARCH 1] for 8xx? I re-checked you recent patch* to allow any address range size for 8xx. With that patch, hw_breakpoint_validate_len() won't get called at all for 8xx. * Message-Id: 1ed0de54ce6021fa0fdf50e938365546a4f5e316.1566925030.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr -Ravi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes 2019-10-10 6:25 ` Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-10-12 7:31 ` Christophe Leroy 2019-10-14 3:44 ` Ravi Bangoria 0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy @ 2019-10-12 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ravi Bangoria Cc: mikey, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev Le 10/10/2019 à 08:25, Ravi Bangoria a écrit : > > > On 10/10/19 10:14 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote: >> >>>> @Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx? >>>> >>> >>> Getting the following : >>> >>> root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak >>> test: ptrace-hwbreak >>> tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok >>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok >>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok >>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok >>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok >>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Fail >>> failure: ptrace-hwbreak >>> >> >> Thanks Christophe. I don't have any 8xx box. I checked qemu and it seems >> qemu emulation for 8xx is not yet supported. So I can't debug this. Can >> you please check why it's failing? > > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG internally uses DAWR register and probably 8xx does > not emulate DAWR logic, it only uses DABR to emulate double-word > watchpoint. > In that case, all testcases that uses PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG should be > disabled for 8xx. I'll change [PATCH 5] accordingly and resend. I think the MODE_EXACT ones are OK with the 8xx at the time being. > > Also, do you think I should fix hw_breakpoint_validate_len() from [PARCH 1] > for 8xx? I re-checked you recent patch* to allow any address range size for > 8xx. With that patch, hw_breakpoint_validate_len() won't get called at all > for 8xx. At the time being, the 8xx emulates DABR so it has the same limitations as BOOK3S. My patch needs to be rebased on top of your series and I think it needs some modifications, as it seems it doesn't properly handle size 1 and size 2 breakpoints at least. So I think that you should leave your Patch1 as is, and I'll modify the validate_len() logic while rebasing my patch. Christophe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes 2019-10-12 7:31 ` Christophe Leroy @ 2019-10-14 3:44 ` Ravi Bangoria 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-10-14 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Ravi Bangoria, mikey, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev On 10/12/19 1:01 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 10/10/2019 à 08:25, Ravi Bangoria a écrit : >> >> >> On 10/10/19 10:14 AM, Ravi Bangoria wrote: >>> >>>>> @Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Getting the following : >>>> >>>> root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak >>>> test: ptrace-hwbreak >>>> tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok >>>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok >>>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok >>>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok >>>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok >>>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok >>>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Fail >>>> failure: ptrace-hwbreak >>>> >>> >>> Thanks Christophe. I don't have any 8xx box. I checked qemu and it seems >>> qemu emulation for 8xx is not yet supported. So I can't debug this. Can >>> you please check why it's failing? >> >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG internally uses DAWR register and probably 8xx does >> not emulate DAWR logic, it only uses DABR to emulate double-word watchpoint. >> In that case, all testcases that uses PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG should be >> disabled for 8xx. I'll change [PATCH 5] accordingly and resend. > > I think the MODE_EXACT ones are OK with the 8xx at the time being. Ok. I'll disable other tests for 8xx. Also, I was bit wrong in above point. Actually, PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG with RANGE breakpoint also support DABR but the length will be 8 only. So I've to change my patch 1 also a bit (ptrace stuff). I'll resend the series with these changes. > >> >> Also, do you think I should fix hw_breakpoint_validate_len() from [PARCH 1] >> for 8xx? I re-checked you recent patch* to allow any address range size for >> 8xx. With that patch, hw_breakpoint_validate_len() won't get called at all >> for 8xx. > > At the time being, the 8xx emulates DABR so it has the same limitations as BOOK3S. > My patch needs to be rebased on top of your series and I think it needs some modifications, as it seems it doesn't properly handle size 1 and size 2 breakpoints at least. > So I think that you should leave your Patch1 as is, and I'll modify the validate_len() logic while rebasing my patch. Sure. Thanks for helping! Ravi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes 2019-10-10 4:44 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-10 6:25 ` Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-10-10 9:30 ` Christophe Leroy 2019-10-12 8:51 ` Christophe Leroy 2 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy @ 2019-10-10 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ravi Bangoria Cc: mikey, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev Le 10/10/2019 à 06:44, Ravi Bangoria a écrit : > >>> @Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx? >>> >> >> Getting the following : >> >> root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak >> test: ptrace-hwbreak >> tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Fail >> failure: ptrace-hwbreak >> > > Thanks Christophe. I don't have any 8xx box. I checked qemu and it seems > qemu emulation for 8xx is not yet supported. So I can't debug this. Can > you please check why it's failing? > First issue: we get a mismatch between the parent and the child, because len 8 test generates two reads/writes while the parent installs the breakpoint only once. Changing glvar from __u64 to unsigned long fixes the problem. Then I get: test: ptrace-hwbreak tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Fail failure: ptrace-hwbreak Which shows that PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG doesn't work in MODE_RANGE Christophe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes 2019-10-10 4:44 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-10 6:25 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-10 9:30 ` Christophe Leroy @ 2019-10-12 8:51 ` Christophe Leroy 2019-10-14 3:44 ` Ravi Bangoria 2 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread From: Christophe Leroy @ 2019-10-12 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ravi Bangoria Cc: mikey, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev Le 10/10/2019 à 06:44, Ravi Bangoria a écrit : > >>> @Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx? >>> >> >> Getting the following : >> >> root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak >> test: ptrace-hwbreak >> tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok >> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok >> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Fail >> failure: ptrace-hwbreak >> > I also tried on a 83xx (book3s/32). This one has a regular DABR : root@vgoippro:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak test: ptrace-hwbreak tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RW, len: 6: Ok PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG failed: Invalid argument failure: ptrace-hwbreak Christophe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes 2019-10-12 8:51 ` Christophe Leroy @ 2019-10-14 3:44 ` Ravi Bangoria 0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread From: Ravi Bangoria @ 2019-10-14 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Ravi Bangoria, mikey, linux-kernel, npiggin, paulus, naveen.n.rao, linuxppc-dev On 10/12/19 2:21 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 10/10/2019 à 06:44, Ravi Bangoria a écrit : >> >>>> @Christophe, Is patch5 works for you on 8xx? >>>> >>> >>> Getting the following : >>> >>> root@vgoip:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak >>> test: ptrace-hwbreak >>> tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok >>> PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok >>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok >>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok >>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok >>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok >>> PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Fail >>> failure: ptrace-hwbreak >>> >> > > I also tried on a 83xx (book3s/32). This one has a regular DABR : > > root@vgoippro:~# ./ptrace-hwbreak > test: ptrace-hwbreak > tags: git_version:v5.4-rc2-710-gf0082e173fe4-dirty > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 1: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 2: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 4: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, WO, len: 8: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 1: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 2: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 4: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RO, len: 8: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 1: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 2: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 4: Ok > PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG, RW, len: 8: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, WO, len: 1: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RO, len: 1: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_EXACT, RW, len: 1: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, WO, len: 6: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RO, len: 6: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG, MODE_RANGE, DW ALIGNED, RW, len: 6: Ok > PPC_PTRACE_SETHWDEBUG failed: Invalid argument Ok. If it has the DABR _only_, creation of MODE RANGE UNALINGED breakpoint will failed because DABR supports only 8 bytes wide breakpoint and it must be doubleword aligned. So this means I've to add all unaligned tests inside if (dawr) condition. Ravi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-14 3:48 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2019-09-25 4:06 [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Fix length calculation for unaligned target Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Don't ignore extraneous exceptions blindly Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Rewrite ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Add dar outside test in perf-hwbreak.c selftest Ravi Bangoria 2019-09-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Support for 8xx in ptrace-hwbreak.c selftest Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-07 6:35 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Powerpc/Watchpoint: Few important fixes Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-09 13:37 ` Christophe Leroy 2019-10-10 4:44 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-10 6:25 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-12 7:31 ` Christophe Leroy 2019-10-14 3:44 ` Ravi Bangoria 2019-10-10 9:30 ` Christophe Leroy 2019-10-12 8:51 ` Christophe Leroy 2019-10-14 3:44 ` Ravi Bangoria
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).