linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	"Liran Alon" <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
	"Laura Abbott" <labbott@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Janakarajan Natarajan" <Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
	"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	"Radim Krcmár" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"KarimAllah Ahmed" <karahmed@amazon.de>,
	"Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	"KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:44:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0575AF4FD06DD142AD198903C74E1CC87A601040@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516992186.30244.268.camel@infradead.org>

> > you asked before and even before you sent the email I confirmed to
> > you that the document is correct
> >
> > I'm not sure what the point is to then question that again 15 minutes
> > later other than creating more noise.
> 
> Apologies, I hadn't seen the comment on IRC.
> 
> Sometimes the docs *don't* get it right, especially when they're
> released in a hurry as that one was. I note there's a *fourth* version
> of microcode-update-guidance.pdf available now, for example :)
> 
> So it is useful that you have explicitly stated that for *this*
> specific concern, the document is in fact correct that SMEP saves us
> from BTB and RSB pollution, *despite* the empirical evidence that those
> structures only hold the low 31 bits.

your question was specific to RSB not BTB. But please show the empirical evidence for RSB ?


  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-26 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-26  2:11 [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation Liran Alon
2018-01-26  2:23 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-26  9:11   ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 17:19     ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-26 17:27       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 17:29       ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 17:31         ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 17:59       ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-26 18:11         ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 18:12           ` Arjan van de Ven
2018-01-26 18:26             ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 18:28               ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-26 18:43                 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 18:44                   ` Van De Ven, Arjan [this message]
2018-01-26 18:53                     ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 19:02         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-26 19:11           ` Hansen, Dave
2018-01-27 13:42             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-27 15:55               ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-26 19:11           ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26  8:46 ` David Woodhouse
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-26  2:50 Liran Alon
2018-01-26  2:55 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-23 11:13 Liran Alon
2018-01-25 22:20 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-22 22:15 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2018-01-20 19:22 [RFC 00/10] Speculation Control feature support KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-20 19:23 ` [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-21 19:14   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-23 16:12     ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-23 16:20       ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-23 22:37         ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-23 22:49           ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-23 23:14             ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-23 23:22               ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-24  0:47               ` Tim Chen
2018-01-24  1:00                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-24  1:22                   ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-24  1:59                   ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-24  3:25                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-21 19:34   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-21 20:28     ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 21:35       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-21 22:00         ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 22:27           ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-22 16:27             ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23  7:29               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23  7:53                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23  9:27                   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23  9:37                     ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 15:01                     ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-23  9:30                   ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 10:15                     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 10:27                       ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 10:44                         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 10:57                           ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 10:23                     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 10:35                       ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-04 18:43                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-04 20:22                         ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-06  9:14                         ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-25 16:19                     ` Mason
2018-01-25 17:16                       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-29 11:59                         ` Mason
2018-01-24  0:05                 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-23 20:16       ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0575AF4FD06DD142AD198903C74E1CC87A601040@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
    --cc=Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).