linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: bunk@fs.tum.de, acme@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
	pekkas@netcore.fi, lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:26:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1064910398.21551.41.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030930010855.095c2c35.davem@redhat.com>

On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 01:08 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> If the user sets CONFIG_IPV6 to 'm' from 'n', and make then creates a
> new kernel image for him (which it will if dependencies are working
> correctly), if he can't figure out that he's gotta install that thing
> maybe he should enable module symbol versions to protect him from
> insmod'ing that ipv6 module by mistake.

Why would he run 'make'? He'll only run 'make modules' since he only
enabled one extra module, and then he expects to be able to load it
without a reboot.

He expects this because it is intuitive ('just a new module') and
because it is true for just about all other modular options in the tree.

> The suggestions I see do nothing to enhance the kernel tree as it currently
> stands.  If you wish to prevent the kernel image from changing due to
> out-of-tree modules being built, fine, but don't impose this restriction
> upon in-kernel modules.

It's a matter of taste. As I said, it's your right to disagree.

Some time during 2.7 I'm sure one of the many people who agree with
Adrian and myself will send patches to Linus and he'll get to arbitrate.

-- 
dwmw2


  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-30  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-28 22:59 RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6 Adrian Bunk
2003-09-28 23:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-28 23:24   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-28 23:39     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-28 23:47       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-29  0:14       ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-29  0:32         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-29  9:02           ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-29 14:15             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-29 14:28               ` Jan Evert van Grootheest
2003-09-29 14:29               ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-29 14:38               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-29 14:46                 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  5:17             ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  6:31               ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-01 19:47                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2003-09-30  5:11           ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 13:37             ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-30 15:04               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-10-01  6:39                 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  5:09     ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  6:32       ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  7:03         ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  7:39           ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  8:08             ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  8:26               ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2003-09-30  8:30                 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  8:42                   ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  8:51                     ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  9:14                       ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  9:17                         ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  9:24                         ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  9:57                           ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-09-30 10:02                           ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 10:01                             ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 10:14                               ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 11:39                             ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-09-30 13:44                           ` Dana Lacoste
2003-09-30 13:50                           ` Kai Germaschewski
2003-09-30 15:13                   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2003-09-30 14:21                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-09-30 14:51                   ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 12:06               ` Olivier Galibert
2003-09-29  6:29 ` Pekka Savola

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1064910398.21551.41.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).