linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com, pekkas@netcore.fi,
	lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:24:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030928232403.GX15338@fs.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030928231842.GE1039@conectiva.com.br>

On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 08:18:42PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:59:41AM +0200, Adrian Bunk escreveu:
> > It seems modular IPv6 doesn't work 100% reliable, e.g. after looking at 
> > the code it doesn't seem to be a good idea to compile a kernel without 
> > IPv6 support and later build and install IPv6 modules. Is there a great 
> > need for modular IPv6 or is the patch below to disallow modular IPv6 OK?
> 
> Please, don't... We're going in the all modules direction, not the other
> way around, distro (general purpose) kernels would get big bloat in the
> static kernel.

E.g. from include/net/tcp.h:

<--  snip  -->

...
struct tcp_skb_cb {
        union {
                struct inet_skb_parm    h4;
#if defined(CONFIG_IPV6) || defined (CONFIG_IPV6_MODULE)
                struct inet6_skb_parm   h6;
#endif
        } header;       /* For incoming frames          */
...

<--  snip  -->

This is broken since it's legal to compile a module much later than the 
kernel.

If modular IPv6 is allowed, the #if has to be removed, and the struct
will be larger in the case IPv6 is never be used.

> - Arnaldo

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-28 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-28 22:59 RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6 Adrian Bunk
2003-09-28 23:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-28 23:24   ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2003-09-28 23:39     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-28 23:47       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-29  0:14       ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-29  0:32         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-29  9:02           ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-29 14:15             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-29 14:28               ` Jan Evert van Grootheest
2003-09-29 14:29               ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-29 14:38               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-29 14:46                 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  5:17             ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  6:31               ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-01 19:47                 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2003-09-30  5:11           ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 13:37             ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-30 15:04               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-10-01  6:39                 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  5:09     ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  6:32       ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  7:03         ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  7:39           ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  8:08             ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  8:26               ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  8:30                 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  8:42                   ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  8:51                     ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  9:14                       ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  9:17                         ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30  9:24                         ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30  9:57                           ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-09-30 10:02                           ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 10:01                             ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 10:14                               ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 11:39                             ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-09-30 13:44                           ` Dana Lacoste
2003-09-30 13:50                           ` Kai Germaschewski
2003-09-30 15:13                   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2003-09-30 14:21                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-09-30 14:51                   ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 12:06               ` Olivier Galibert
2003-09-29  6:29 ` Pekka Savola

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030928232403.GX15338@fs.tum.de \
    --to=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=acme@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).