From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com, pekkas@netcore.fi,
lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:18:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030928231842.GE1039@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030928225941.GW15338@fs.tum.de>
Em Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:59:41AM +0200, Adrian Bunk escreveu:
> It seems modular IPv6 doesn't work 100% reliable, e.g. after looking at
> the code it doesn't seem to be a good idea to compile a kernel without
> IPv6 support and later build and install IPv6 modules. Is there a great
> need for modular IPv6 or is the patch below to disallow modular IPv6 OK?
Please, don't... We're going in the all modules direction, not the other
way around, distro (general purpose) kernels would get big bloat in the
static kernel.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-28 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-28 22:59 RFC: [2.6 patch] disallow modular IPv6 Adrian Bunk
2003-09-28 23:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2003-09-28 23:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-28 23:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-28 23:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-29 0:14 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-29 0:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-29 9:02 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-29 14:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-09-29 14:28 ` Jan Evert van Grootheest
2003-09-29 14:29 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-29 14:38 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-29 14:46 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 5:17 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 6:31 ` David Woodhouse
2003-10-01 19:47 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2003-09-30 5:11 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 13:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-30 15:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-10-01 6:39 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 5:09 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 6:32 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 7:03 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 7:39 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 8:08 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 8:26 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 8:30 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 8:42 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 8:51 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 9:14 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 9:17 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 9:24 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 9:57 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-09-30 10:02 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 10:01 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-30 10:14 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 11:39 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-09-30 13:44 ` Dana Lacoste
2003-09-30 13:50 ` Kai Germaschewski
2003-09-30 15:13 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2003-09-30 14:21 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-09-30 14:51 ` David Woodhouse
2003-09-30 12:06 ` Olivier Galibert
2003-09-29 6:29 ` Pekka Savola
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030928231842.GE1039@conectiva.com.br \
--to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).