From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: paulmck@us.ibm.com
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@infradead.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
viro@zenII.uk.linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: make flock_lock_file_wait static
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 20:01:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1106938895.7776.33.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050128141446.GA1868@us.ibm.com>
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 06:14 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 07:59:42PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 08:07 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > > Another question: is the SDD module even available for mainline kernels,
> > > > or is it only available for distribution kernels ?
> > >
> > > Distributions only.
> >
> > don't you think it's a bit weird/offensive to ask for exports in the
> > mainline kernel.org kernel while all you care about is certain vendor
> > kernels and never plan to provide it for mainline????
>
> In my experience, the only way to get exports into a major distribution
> is to get them into mainline kernel.org. If you can get Red Hat to
> change its stance on this, works for me!
so a business problem between IBM and Red Hat is reason to bloat
everyones kernel ????
that's sooo wrong.
(and no I cannot change the RH policy)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-28 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-09 19:42 make flock_lock_file_wait static Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-09 22:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-01-10 8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-10 8:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-10 14:23 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-01-11 8:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-11 19:16 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-01-11 19:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-25 18:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-01-26 3:10 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 9:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-26 16:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-01-26 18:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-28 14:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-01-28 18:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-28 19:01 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2005-01-26 9:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-26 9:51 ` Al Viro
2005-01-26 9:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-26 10:00 ` Al Viro
2005-01-15 21:35 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-01-15 22:07 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-01-10 8:35 ` Ken Preslan
2005-01-10 8:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1106938895.7776.33.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjanv@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=viro@zenII.uk.linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).