From: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
viro@zenII.uk.linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: make flock_lock_file_wait static
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:00:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050126100002.GH8859@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050126095504.GA7542@infradead.org>
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:55:04AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:51:31AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:43:08AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > o vfs_follow_link(): used to interpret symbolic links, which
> > > > might point outside of SAN Filesystem.
> > >
> > > This one is going away very soon, including the whole old-style
> > > ->follow_link support - for technical reasons.
> >
> > Not really. In some cases it _is_ legitimate. Trivial example:
> > /proc/self.
>
> Which is an extreme special case an not modular.
I'm not convinced. Sure, leaving traversal to caller is preferable.
I don't believe that it should be enforced. That's why we have a way
to enforce a separate limit on that sort of recursion...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-26 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-09 19:42 make flock_lock_file_wait static Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-09 22:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-01-10 8:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-10 8:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-10 14:23 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-01-11 8:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-11 19:16 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-01-11 19:36 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-25 18:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-01-26 3:10 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 9:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-26 16:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-01-26 18:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-28 14:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-01-28 18:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-28 19:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-01-26 9:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-26 9:51 ` Al Viro
2005-01-26 9:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-01-26 10:00 ` Al Viro [this message]
2005-01-15 21:35 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-01-15 22:07 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-01-10 8:35 ` Ken Preslan
2005-01-10 8:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050126100002.GH8859@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=viro@zenII.uk.linux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).