From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mike Chan <mike@android.com>
Cc: Salman <sqazi@google.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, arjan@infradead.org,
csadler@google.com, ranjitm@google.com, kenchen@google.com,
dawnchen@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:21:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271924513.1776.315.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <v2v8bb80c381004211832o88258fdez8e640ad9a45d11c0@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 18:32 -0700, Mike Chan wrote:
>
> I may have missed this on lkml but are there any on-going community
> efforts to power aware scheduling?
>
Well, mostly targeting load-balancing, which I gather is kinda useless
for android seeing that it runs on UP hardware.
But yeah, both IBM and Intel have contributed significant work in this
area.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-22 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-14 0:08 [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping Salman
2010-04-14 0:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] [kidled]: introduce kidled Salman
2010-04-14 9:49 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-14 15:41 ` Salman Qazi
2010-04-15 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-14 0:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] [kidled]: Add eager injection Salman
2010-04-14 0:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] [kidled]: Introduce power capping priority and LB awareness Salman
2010-04-15 7:51 ` [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-17 17:08 ` tytso
2010-04-17 17:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-17 19:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19 17:20 ` Salman Qazi
2010-04-19 19:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-20 1:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-20 5:00 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-04-20 4:50 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-04-20 17:52 ` Salman Qazi
2010-04-21 5:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-22 1:32 ` Mike Chan
2010-04-22 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-04-22 19:02 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-04-17 16:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271924513.1776.315.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=csadler@google.com \
--cc=dawnchen@google.com \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mike@android.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ranjitm@google.com \
--cc=sqazi@google.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).