From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: Salman <sqazi@google.com>,
mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, arjan@infradead.org,
csadler@google.com, ranjitm@google.com, kenchen@google.com,
dawnchen@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:51:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271533888.1674.486.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100417170808.GE32634@thunk.org>
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 13:08 -0400, tytso@mit.edu wrote:
> I think it's well understood
> that when these patches are ready to be merged, they need to be
> submitted right before the merge window opens, against a recent -rc
> kernel.
No, they need to be in the relevant subsystem tree by then, patch
submissions to subsystem trees right before the merge window opens are
bound to get delayed another cycle.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-17 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-14 0:08 [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping Salman
2010-04-14 0:08 ` [PATCH 1/3] [kidled]: introduce kidled Salman
2010-04-14 9:49 ` Andi Kleen
2010-04-14 15:41 ` Salman Qazi
2010-04-15 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-14 0:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] [kidled]: Add eager injection Salman
2010-04-14 0:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] [kidled]: Introduce power capping priority and LB awareness Salman
2010-04-15 7:51 ` [PATCH 0/3] [idled]: Idle Cycle Injector for power capping Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-17 17:08 ` tytso
2010-04-17 17:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-17 19:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-04-19 17:20 ` Salman Qazi
2010-04-19 19:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-20 1:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-20 5:00 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-04-20 4:50 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-04-20 17:52 ` Salman Qazi
2010-04-21 5:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-04-22 1:32 ` Mike Chan
2010-04-22 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-22 19:02 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-04-17 16:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271533888.1674.486.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=csadler@google.com \
--cc=dawnchen@google.com \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ranjitm@google.com \
--cc=sqazi@google.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).