From: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, serge.hallyn@canonical.com,
coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pmoore@redhat.com, eparis@redhat.com,
djm@mindrot.org, segoon@openwall.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
jmorris@namei.org, scarybeasts@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com,
penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, khilman@ti.com,
borislav.petkov@amd.com, amwang@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, gregkh@suse.de,
dhowells@redhat.com, daniel.lezcano@free.fr,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, olofj@chromium.org,
mhalcrow@google.com, dlaor@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, unshare, and chroot
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:49:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1326746949.3467.16.camel@lenny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1326673414.git.luto@amacapital.net>
On Sun, 2012-01-15 at 16:37 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> To make the no_new_privs discussion more concrete, here is an updated
> series that is actually useful. It adds PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS
I think it'd be clearer to call it PR_SET_NOSUID - basically it should
match the semantics for MS_NOSUID mounts, as if on every exec()
thereafter the target binary was on a nosuid filesystem.
You might then change this flag to only take effect on a later exec(),
which would solve your race condition for the hypothetical PAM module.
> with the
> same semantics as before (plus John Johansen's AppArmor fix and with
> improved bisectability). It then allows some unshare flags
What's the rationale behind the unshare subset? Did you actually
analyze any setuid binaries found on Debian/Fedora etc. and determined
that e.g. CLONE_NEWNET was problematic for some reason?
I actually want CLONE_NEWNET for my build tool, so I can be sure the
arbitrary code I'm executing as part of the build at least isn't
downloading more new code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-16 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-16 0:37 [PATCH v2 0/4] PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, unshare, and chroot Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-16 0:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] Add PR_{GET,SET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS to prevent execve from granting privs Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-16 17:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-16 20:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-16 0:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] Fix apparmor for PR_{GET,SET}_NO_NEW_PRIVS Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-16 0:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Allow unprivileged CLONE_NEWUTS and CLONE_NEWIPC with no_new_privs Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-16 0:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] Allow unprivileged chroot when safe Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-16 0:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-01-16 1:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-16 19:26 ` Colin Walters
2012-01-16 20:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-17 10:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2012-01-16 20:06 ` Al Viro
2012-01-16 20:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-16 20:26 ` Al Viro
2012-01-17 16:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-17 16:31 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-16 1:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, unshare, and chroot Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-16 20:49 ` Colin Walters [this message]
2012-01-16 21:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2012-01-16 21:47 ` Colin Walters
2012-01-16 21:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1326746949.3467.16.camel@lenny \
--to=walters@verbum.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=amwang@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=djm@mindrot.org \
--cc=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mhalcrow@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=olofj@chromium.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scarybeasts@gmail.com \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).