linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v6 1/2 ] Use lock_device_hotplug() in cpu_probe_store() and cpu_release_store()
Date: Fri,  9 May 2014 16:40:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399624816-11127-1-git-send-email-zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1399624508.2630.11.camel@ThinkPad-T5421.cn.ibm.com>

While auditing the usage of lock_device_hotplug_sysfs() for implementing
it in another way in following patch, it seems to me that the code here
is to add/remove device, and the files probe/release themselves won't be
removed.

lock_device_hotplug_sysfs() is used to solve the deadlocks of s_active of
the "online" file and the hotplug related locks.

So if one process trying to remove the device, the sysfs files for this device,
including "online" will be removed after device_hotplug_lock is grabbed.
So for another process which might concurrently write to the "online" file,
after it grabs s_active of the "online", it couldn't directly lock
device_hotplug_lock, instead, in *_sysfs() version, try lock is used, and if
it fails, the whole syscall is restarted.

But here the s_active of "probe/release" are not involved in the above process,
as they are not to be removed. So we could use lock_device_hotplug() here.

Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/base/cpu.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c
index 006b1bc..9483225 100644
--- a/drivers/base/cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c
@@ -88,9 +88,7 @@ static ssize_t cpu_probe_store(struct device *dev,
 	ssize_t cnt;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = lock_device_hotplug_sysfs();
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	lock_device_hotplug();
 
 	cnt = arch_cpu_probe(buf, count);
 
@@ -106,9 +104,7 @@ static ssize_t cpu_release_store(struct device *dev,
 	ssize_t cnt;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = lock_device_hotplug_sysfs();
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	lock_device_hotplug();
 
 	cnt = arch_cpu_release(buf, count);
 
-- 
1.8.1.4


  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-09  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-10  9:18 [RFC PATCH] Suppress a device hot remove related lockdep warning Li Zhong
2014-04-10 13:31 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-11  4:10   ` [RFC PATCH v2] Use kernfs_break_active_protection() for device online store callbacks Li Zhong
2014-04-11 10:26     ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-14  7:47       ` [RFC PATCH v3] " Li Zhong
2014-04-14 20:13         ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-15  2:44           ` Li Zhong
2014-04-15 14:50             ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-16  1:41               ` Li Zhong
2014-04-16 15:17                 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-17  3:05                   ` Li Zhong
2014-04-17 15:06                     ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-17  6:50                   ` [RFC PATCH v4] " Li Zhong
2014-04-17 15:17                     ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-18  8:33                       ` Li Zhong
2014-04-21  9:20                       ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] Use lock_device_hotplug() in cpu_probe_store() and cpu_release_store() Li Zhong
2014-04-21  9:23                         ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/2] Use kernfs_break_active_protection() for device online store callbacks Li Zhong
2014-04-21 22:46                           ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-22  3:34                             ` Li Zhong
2014-04-22 10:11                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-23  1:50                                 ` Li Zhong
2014-04-23 10:54                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-24  1:13                                     ` Li Zhong
2014-04-22 20:44                               ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-22 22:21                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-23 14:23                                   ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-23 16:12                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-23 16:52                                       ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-24  8:59                                       ` Li Zhong
2014-04-24 10:02                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-25  1:46                                           ` Li Zhong
2014-04-25 12:47                                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-28  1:49                                               ` Li Zhong
2014-04-23  5:03                                 ` Li Zhong
2014-04-23 10:58                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-04-24  1:33                                     ` Li Zhong
2014-05-09  8:35                               ` Li Zhong
2014-05-09  8:40                                 ` Li Zhong [this message]
2014-05-09  8:40                                   ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/2] Implement lock_device_hotplug_sysfs() by breaking active protection Li Zhong
2014-04-21 22:38                         ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] Use lock_device_hotplug() in cpu_probe_store() and cpu_release_store() Tejun Heo
2014-04-22  2:29                           ` Li Zhong
2014-04-22 20:40                             ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-23  2:00                               ` Li Zhong
2014-04-23 14:39                                 ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-24  8:37                                   ` Li Zhong
2014-04-24 14:32                                     ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-25  1:56                                       ` Li Zhong
2014-04-25 12:28                                         ` Tejun Heo
2014-04-28  0:51                                           ` Li Zhong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1399624816-11127-1-git-send-email-zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).