* [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Classify /proc/cpuinfo flag bits and add missing bits in documentation
@ 2017-12-09 0:25 Fenghua Yu
[not found] ` <3690e566-27df-9931-fb89-31c8e117a314@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fenghua Yu @ 2017-12-09 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar, Tony Luck,
Vikas Shivappa, Ravi V Shankar, Chatre, Reinette, Sai Prakhya,
x86, linux-kernel
Cc: Fenghua Yu
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
With more flag bits in /proc/cpuinfo for RDT, it's better to classify the
bits for readability.
Some previously missing bits are added as well.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
index 6851854..9b62738 100644
--- a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
+++ b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
@@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
This feature is enabled by the CONFIG_INTEL_RDT Kconfig and the
-X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits "rdt", "cqm", "cat_l3" and "cdp_l3".
+X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits:
+RDT (Resource Director Technology) Allocation - "rdt_a"
+CAT (Cache Allocation Technology) - "cat_l3", "cdp_l3", "cat_l2"
+CQM (Cache QoS Monitoring) - "cqm_llc", "cqm_occup_llc"
+MBM (Memory Bandwidth Monitoring) - "cqm_mbm_total", "cqm_mbm_local"
+MBA (Memory Bandwidth Allocation) - "mba"
To use the feature mount the file system:
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Classify /proc/cpuinfo flag bits and add missing bits in documentation
[not found] ` <3690e566-27df-9931-fb89-31c8e117a314@gmail.com>
@ 2017-12-11 1:22 ` Fenghua Yu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fenghua Yu @ 2017-12-11 1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brice Goglin
Cc: Fenghua Yu, Thomas Gleixner, H. Peter Anvin, Ingo Molnar,
Tony Luck, Vikas Shivappa, Ravi V Shankar, Chatre, Reinette,
Sai Prakhya, x86, linux-kernel
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:58:01PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 09/12/2017 à 01:25, Fenghua Yu a écrit :
> > From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> >
> > With more flag bits in /proc/cpuinfo for RDT, it's better to classify the
> > bits for readability.
> >
> > Some previously missing bits are added as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > index 6851854..9b62738 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> > Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
> >
> > This feature is enabled by the CONFIG_INTEL_RDT Kconfig and the
> > -X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits "rdt", "cqm", "cat_l3" and "cdp_l3".
> > +X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits:
> > +RDT (Resource Director Technology) Allocation - "rdt_a"
> > +CAT (Cache Allocation Technology) - "cat_l3", "cdp_l3", "cat_l2"
>
> Why not "Code and Data Prioritization" for cdp_l3?
CDP is an extension of CAT. So I just put cdp_l3 into the CAT class.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-11 1:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-09 0:25 [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Classify /proc/cpuinfo flag bits and add missing bits in documentation Fenghua Yu
[not found] ` <3690e566-27df-9931-fb89-31c8e117a314@gmail.com>
2017-12-11 1:22 ` Fenghua Yu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).