linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"rkrcmar@redhat.com" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
	"vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"rkagan@virtuozzo.com" <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>,
	"graf@amazon.com" <graf@amazon.com>,
	"jschoenh@amazon.de" <jschoenh@amazon.de>,
	"karahmed@amazon.de" <karahmed@amazon.de>,
	"rimasluk@amazon.com" <rimasluk@amazon.com>,
	"Grimm, Jon" <Jon.Grimm@amd.com>,
	"Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 15/17] kvm: ioapic: Refactor kvm_ioapic_update_eoi()
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 22:41:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1572648072-84536-16-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1572648072-84536-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>

Refactor code for handling IOAPIC EOI for subsequent patch.
There is no functional change.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
index d859ae8..c57b7bb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
@@ -151,10 +151,16 @@ static void kvm_rtc_eoi_tracking_restore_all(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
 	    __rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_restore_one(vcpu);
 }
 
-static void rtc_irq_eoi(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static void rtc_irq_eoi(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			int vector)
 {
-	if (test_and_clear_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id,
-			       ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map.map)) {
+	struct dest_map *dest_map = &ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map;
+
+	/* RTC special handling */
+	if (test_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, dest_map->map) &&
+	    (vector == dest_map->vectors[vcpu->vcpu_id]) &&
+	    (test_and_clear_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id,
+				ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map.map))) {
 		--ioapic->rtc_status.pending_eoi;
 		rtc_status_pending_eoi_check_valid(ioapic);
 	}
@@ -415,72 +421,68 @@ static void kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work(struct work_struct *work)
 }
 
 #define IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT 10000
-
-static void __kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, int vector, int trigger_mode)
+static void kvm_ioapic_update_eoi_one(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				      struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic,
+				      int trigger_mode,
+				      int pin)
 {
-	struct dest_map *dest_map = &ioapic->rtc_status.dest_map;
 	struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
-	int i;
-
-	/* RTC special handling */
-	if (test_bit(vcpu->vcpu_id, dest_map->map) &&
-	    vector == dest_map->vectors[vcpu->vcpu_id])
-		rtc_irq_eoi(ioapic, vcpu);
-
-	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++) {
-		union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[i];
-
-		if (ent->fields.vector != vector)
-			continue;
+	union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[pin];
 
-		/*
-		 * We are dropping lock while calling ack notifiers because ack
-		 * notifier callbacks for assigned devices call into IOAPIC
-		 * recursively. Since remote_irr is cleared only after call
-		 * to notifiers if the same vector will be delivered while lock
-		 * is dropped it will be put into irr and will be delivered
-		 * after ack notifier returns.
-		 */
-		spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
-		kvm_notify_acked_irq(ioapic->kvm, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, i);
-		spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
+	/*
+	 * We are dropping lock while calling ack notifiers because ack
+	 * notifier callbacks for assigned devices call into IOAPIC
+	 * recursively. Since remote_irr is cleared only after call
+	 * to notifiers if the same vector will be delivered while lock
+	 * is dropped it will be put into irr and will be delivered
+	 * after ack notifier returns.
+	 */
+	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
+	kvm_notify_acked_irq(ioapic->kvm, KVM_IRQCHIP_IOAPIC, pin);
+	spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
 
-		if (trigger_mode != IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG ||
-		    kvm_lapic_get_reg(apic, APIC_SPIV) & APIC_SPIV_DIRECTED_EOI)
-			continue;
+	if (trigger_mode != IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG ||
+	    kvm_lapic_get_reg(apic, APIC_SPIV) & APIC_SPIV_DIRECTED_EOI)
+		return;
 
-		ASSERT(ent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG);
-		ent->fields.remote_irr = 0;
-		if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << i))) {
-			++ioapic->irq_eoi[i];
-			if (ioapic->irq_eoi[i] == IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT) {
-				/*
-				 * Real hardware does not deliver the interrupt
-				 * immediately during eoi broadcast, and this
-				 * lets a buggy guest make slow progress
-				 * even if it does not correctly handle a
-				 * level-triggered interrupt.  Emulate this
-				 * behavior if we detect an interrupt storm.
-				 */
-				schedule_delayed_work(&ioapic->eoi_inject, HZ / 100);
-				ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
-				trace_kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj(ent->bits);
-			} else {
-				ioapic_service(ioapic, i, false);
-			}
+	ASSERT(ent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG);
+	ent->fields.remote_irr = 0;
+	if (!ent->fields.mask && (ioapic->irr & (1 << pin))) {
+		++ioapic->irq_eoi[pin];
+		if (ioapic->irq_eoi[pin] == IOAPIC_SUCCESSIVE_IRQ_MAX_COUNT) {
+			/*
+			 * Real hardware does not deliver the interrupt
+			 * immediately during eoi broadcast, and this
+			 * lets a buggy guest make slow progress
+			 * even if it does not correctly handle a
+			 * level-triggered interrupt.  Emulate this
+			 * behavior if we detect an interrupt storm.
+			 */
+			schedule_delayed_work(&ioapic->eoi_inject, HZ / 100);
+			ioapic->irq_eoi[pin] = 0;
+			trace_kvm_ioapic_delayed_eoi_inj(ent->bits);
 		} else {
-			ioapic->irq_eoi[i] = 0;
+			ioapic_service(ioapic, pin, false);
 		}
+	} else {
+		ioapic->irq_eoi[pin] = 0;
 	}
 }
 
 void kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector, int trigger_mode)
 {
+	int i;
 	struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic = vcpu->kvm->arch.vioapic;
 
 	spin_lock(&ioapic->lock);
-	__kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(vcpu, ioapic, vector, trigger_mode);
+	rtc_irq_eoi(ioapic, vcpu, vector);
+	for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++) {
+		union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[i];
+
+		if (ent->fields.vector != vector)
+			continue;
+		kvm_ioapic_update_eoi_one(vcpu, ioapic, trigger_mode, i);
+	}
 	spin_unlock(&ioapic->lock);
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-01 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-01 22:41 [PATCH v4 00/17] kvm: x86: Support AMD SVM AVIC w/ in-kernel irqchip mode Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] kvm: x86: Modify kvm_x86_ops.get_enable_apicv() to use struct kvm parameter Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] kvm: lapic: Introduce APICv update helper function Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] kvm: x86: Introduce APICv deactivate bits Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-02  9:51   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] kvm: x86: Add support for activate/de-activate APICv at runtime Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-02  9:52   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-04 19:22     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] kvm: x86: Add APICv activate/deactivate request trace points Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] kvm: x86: svm: Add support to activate/deactivate posted interrupts Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] svm: Add support for setup/destroy virutal APIC backing page for AVIC Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-04 21:53   ` Roman Kagan
2019-11-12  0:05     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] kvm: x86: Introduce APICv pre-update hook Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-04 22:05   ` Roman Kagan
2019-11-12  0:08     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2019-11-12 11:12       ` Roman Kagan
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] svm: Add support for activate/deactivate AVIC at runtime Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] kvm: x86: hyperv: Use APICv update request interface Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] svm: Deactivate AVIC when launching guest with nested SVM support Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] svm: Temporary deactivate AVIC during ExtINT handling Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-02 10:01   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] kvm: i8254: Deactivate APICv when using in-kernel PIT re-injection mode Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-02  9:57   ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-04 18:54     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-04 21:49       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-05  7:05         ` Graf (AWS), Alexander
2019-11-05  8:40           ` Roman Kagan
2019-11-04 23:17     ` Roman Kagan
2019-11-05 22:47       ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-11-11 17:37         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2019-11-12 12:22           ` Roman Kagan
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] kvm: lapic: Clean up APIC predefined macros Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-01 22:41 ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee [this message]
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] kvm: ioapic: Lazy update IOAPIC EOI Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2019-11-01 22:41 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] svm: Allow AVIC with in-kernel irqchip mode Suthikulpanit, Suravee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1572648072-84536-16-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=Jon.Grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jschoenh@amazon.de \
    --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rimasluk@amazon.com \
    --cc=rkagan@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 15/17] kvm: ioapic: Refactor kvm_ioapic_update_eoi()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).