From: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>
To: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>,
'Srinivas Pandruvada' <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
'Thomas Gleixner' <tglx@linutronix.de>,
'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@redhat.com>,
'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@infradead.org>,
'Borislav Petkov' <bp@suse.de>, 'Len Brown' <lenb@kernel.org>,
"'Rafael J . Wysocki'" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
'Mel Gorman' <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
'Matt Fleming' <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
'Viresh Kumar' <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
'Juri Lelli' <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
'Paul Turner' <pjt@google.com>,
'Vincent Guittot' <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
'Quentin Perret' <qperret@qperret.net>,
'Dietmar Eggemann' <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:06:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1574697961.16378.5.camel@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001d5a29b$c944fd70$5bcef850$@net>
On Sat, 2019-11-23 at 23:49 -0800, Doug Smythies wrote:
> ...
> Kernel 5.4-rc8 + revert, intel_cpufreq/schedutil: 3899 seconds
> Kernel 5.4-rc8 + gg 6 + revert, intel_cpufreq/schedutil: 2740.7 seconds
> Ratio: 0.70 (as expected)
> Kernel 5.4-rc8, intel_cpufreq/schedutil: 2334.7 seconds (faster than expected)
> Kernel 5.4-rc8 + gg 6 patch set, intel_cpufreq/schedutil: 2275.0 seconds (faster than expected)
> Ratio: 0.97 (not as expected)
> Kernel 5.4-rc8, intel_cpufreq/performance: 2215.3 seconds
> Kernel 5.4-rc8, intel_cpufreq/ondemand: 3286.3 seconds
> Re-stated from previous e-mail:
> Kernel 5.3-rc8, intel_cpufreq/schedutil: ratio: 0.69 (I don't have the original times)
Hello Doug,
schedutil in 5.4 going a lot faster than in 5.3 would be a surprise. I'm
running that same test too to check if I can see it as well.
Besides, as it's already been said this patchset adds frequency
scale-invariance to scheduler metrics such as load and utilization and that's
useful also in areas other than frequency scaling (most notably the scheduler
load balancer).
Thanks,
Giovanni
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-25 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 12:46 [PATCH v4 0/6] Add support for frequency invariance for (some) x86 Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-24 7:49 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-25 8:16 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-25 9:16 ` Mel Gorman
2019-11-25 16:06 ` Giovanni Gherdovich [this message]
2019-11-26 5:59 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-26 15:20 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-27 7:32 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-28 22:48 ` Doug Smythies
2019-12-19 10:48 ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-23 7:47 ` Doug Smythies
2019-12-23 14:07 ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-23 14:40 ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-23 16:34 ` Doug Smythies
2019-12-23 19:10 ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-24 1:16 ` Doug Smythies
2019-12-24 11:08 ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-02 16:34 ` Ionela Voinescu
2019-12-06 11:57 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-12-18 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-19 20:27 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance on SKYLAKE_X Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-12-18 20:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-19 20:29 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance on XEON_PHI_KNL/KNM Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-12-18 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-19 20:32 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance on ATOM_GOLDMONT* Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance on ATOM Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 16:50 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2019-11-15 10:34 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] x86: intel_pstate: handle runtime turbo disablement/enablement in freq. invariance Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-12-18 20:37 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Add support for frequency invariance for (some) x86 Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-19 20:33 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1574697961.16378.5.camel@suse.cz \
--to=ggherdovich@suse.cz \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=qperret@qperret.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).