From: "tip-bot2 for Kan Liang" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86 <x86@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out rdlbr_all() and wrlbr_all()
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 09:51:49 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <159420190945.4006.11664320269777950684.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1593780569-62993-13-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: fda1f99f34a8f0975086bcfef34da865009995c1
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/fda1f99f34a8f0975086bcfef34da865009995c1
Author: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 05:49:18 -07:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:38:54 +02:00
perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out rdlbr_all() and wrlbr_all()
The previous model-specific LBR and Architecture LBR (legacy way) use a
similar method to save/restore the LBR information, which directly
accesses the LBR registers. The codes which read/write a set of LBR
registers can be shared between them.
Factor out two functions which are used to read/write a set of LBR
registers.
Add lbr_info into structure x86_pmu, and use it to replace the hardcoded
LBR INFO MSR, because the LBR INFO MSR address of the previous
model-specific LBR is different from Architecture LBR. The MSR address
should be assigned at boot time. For now, only Sky Lake and later
platforms have the LBR INFO MSR.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1593780569-62993-13-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
---
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
arch/x86/events/perf_event.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 21f4f07..d3d129c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_reset_64(void)
wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_from + i, 0);
wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_to + i, 0);
if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
- wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + i, 0);
+ wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_info + i, 0);
}
}
@@ -343,6 +343,11 @@ static __always_inline void wrlbr_to(unsigned int idx, u64 val)
wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_to + idx, val);
}
+static __always_inline void wrlbr_info(unsigned int idx, u64 val)
+{
+ wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_info + idx, val);
+}
+
static __always_inline u64 rdlbr_from(unsigned int idx)
{
u64 val;
@@ -361,8 +366,44 @@ static __always_inline u64 rdlbr_to(unsigned int idx)
return val;
}
+static __always_inline u64 rdlbr_info(unsigned int idx)
+{
+ u64 val;
+
+ rdmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_info + idx, val);
+
+ return val;
+}
+
+static inline void
+wrlbr_all(struct lbr_entry *lbr, unsigned int idx, bool need_info)
+{
+ wrlbr_from(idx, lbr->from);
+ wrlbr_to(idx, lbr->to);
+ if (need_info)
+ wrlbr_info(idx, lbr->info);
+}
+
+static inline bool
+rdlbr_all(struct lbr_entry *lbr, unsigned int idx, bool need_info)
+{
+ u64 from = rdlbr_from(idx);
+
+ /* Don't read invalid entry */
+ if (!from)
+ return false;
+
+ lbr->from = from;
+ lbr->to = rdlbr_to(idx);
+ if (need_info)
+ lbr->info = rdlbr_info(idx);
+
+ return true;
+}
+
void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
{
+ bool need_info = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO;
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx = ctx;
int i;
@@ -372,11 +413,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
for (i = 0; i < task_ctx->valid_lbrs; i++) {
lbr_idx = (tos - i) & mask;
- wrlbr_from(lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].from);
- wrlbr_to(lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].to);
-
- if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
- wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].info);
+ wrlbr_all(&task_ctx->lbr[i], lbr_idx, need_info);
}
for (; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
@@ -384,7 +421,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
wrlbr_from(lbr_idx, 0);
wrlbr_to(lbr_idx, 0);
if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
- wrmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, 0);
+ wrlbr_info(lbr_idx, 0);
}
wrmsrl(x86_pmu.lbr_tos, tos);
@@ -427,23 +464,19 @@ static void __intel_pmu_lbr_restore(void *ctx)
void intel_pmu_lbr_save(void *ctx)
{
+ bool need_info = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO;
struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx = ctx;
unsigned lbr_idx, mask;
- u64 tos, from;
+ u64 tos;
int i;
mask = x86_pmu.lbr_nr - 1;
tos = intel_pmu_lbr_tos();
for (i = 0; i < x86_pmu.lbr_nr; i++) {
lbr_idx = (tos - i) & mask;
- from = rdlbr_from(lbr_idx);
- if (!from)
+ if (!rdlbr_all(&task_ctx->lbr[i], lbr_idx, need_info))
break;
- task_ctx->lbr[i].from = from;
- task_ctx->lbr[i].to = rdlbr_to(lbr_idx);
- if (x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO)
- rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, task_ctx->lbr[i].info);
}
task_ctx->valid_lbrs = i;
task_ctx->tos = tos;
@@ -689,7 +722,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
if (lbr_format == LBR_FORMAT_INFO && need_info) {
u64 info;
- rdmsrl(MSR_LBR_INFO_0 + lbr_idx, info);
+ info = rdlbr_info(lbr_idx);
mis = !!(info & LBR_INFO_MISPRED);
pred = !mis;
in_tx = !!(info & LBR_INFO_IN_TX);
@@ -1336,6 +1369,7 @@ __init void intel_pmu_lbr_init_skl(void)
x86_pmu.lbr_tos = MSR_LBR_TOS;
x86_pmu.lbr_from = MSR_LBR_NHM_FROM;
x86_pmu.lbr_to = MSR_LBR_NHM_TO;
+ x86_pmu.lbr_info = MSR_LBR_INFO_0;
x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask = LBR_SEL_MASK;
x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map = hsw_lbr_sel_map;
@@ -1421,7 +1455,7 @@ int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
lbr->nr = x86_pmu.lbr_nr;
lbr->from = x86_pmu.lbr_from;
lbr->to = x86_pmu.lbr_to;
- lbr->info = (lbr_fmt == LBR_FORMAT_INFO) ? MSR_LBR_INFO_0 : 0;
+ lbr->info = (lbr_fmt == LBR_FORMAT_INFO) ? x86_pmu.lbr_info : 0;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index aaa426d..20e35cb 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
* Intel LBR
*/
unsigned int lbr_tos, lbr_from, lbr_to,
- lbr_nr; /* LBR base regs and size */
+ lbr_info, lbr_nr; /* LBR base regs and size */
union {
u64 lbr_sel_mask; /* LBR_SELECT valid bits */
u64 lbr_ctl_mask; /* LBR_CTL valid bits */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-08 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-03 12:49 [PATCH V3 00/23] Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 01/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add Architectural LBRs feature bit kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-09 23:00 ` Dave Hansen
2020-07-10 9:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-10 14:09 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 02/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR reset kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 03/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add a function pointer for LBR read kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 04/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Add the function pointers for LBR save and restore kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 05/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out a new struct for generic optimization kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 06/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use dynamic data structure for task_ctx kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 07/23] x86/msr-index: Add bunch of MSRs for Arch LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 08/23] perf/x86: Expose CPUID enumeration bits for arch LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 09/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support LBR_CTL kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 10/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Unify the stored format of LBR information kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 11/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Mark the {rd,wr}lbr_{to,from} wrappers __always_inline kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 12/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out rdlbr_all() and wrlbr_all() kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` tip-bot2 for Kan Liang [this message]
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 13/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Factor out intel_pmu_store_lbr kan.liang
2020-07-03 19:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-03 20:59 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-06 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-06 13:32 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-06 14:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-06 22:29 ` Liang, Kan
2020-07-07 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 14/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support Architectural LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 15/23] perf/core: Factor out functions to allocate/free the task_ctx_data kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 16/23] perf/core: Use kmem_cache to allocate the PMU specific data kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 17/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Create kmem_cache for the LBR context data kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 18/23] perf/x86: Remove task_ctx_size kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 19/23] x86/fpu: Use proper mask to replace full instruction mask kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 20/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Support dynamic supervisor feature for LBR kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2021-05-27 22:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 21/23] x86/fpu/xstate: Add helpers for LBR dynamic supervisor feature kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 22/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES/XRSTORS for LBR context switch kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 12:49 ` [PATCH V3 23/23] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Support XSAVES for arch LBR read kan.liang
2020-07-08 9:51 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2020-07-03 19:34 ` [PATCH V3 00/23] Support Architectural LBR Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=159420190945.4006.11664320269777950684.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).