* [RFC PATCH 0/3] ACPI / PM: Move _PTS/_WAK invocations out of the noirq stage
@ 2016-06-28 8:04 Lv Zheng
2016-06-28 8:04 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] PM: Rename prepare_late/wake suspend_ops callbacks to prepare_noirq/finish_noirq Lv Zheng
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lv Zheng @ 2016-06-28 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown
Cc: Lv Zheng, Lv Zheng, linux-kernel, linux-acpi
Currently _PTS/_WAK are invoked during noirq stages, while in _PTS/_WAK,
there can be EC transactions. Though the EC driver is able to handle
transactions using polling mode, for the performance reason, it is better
to move _PTS/_WAK out of the noirq stage.
Lv Zheng (3):
PM: Rename prepare_late/wake suspend_ops callbacks to
prepare_noirq/finish_noirq
PM: Add prepare_late/finish_early suspend_ops callbacks
ACPI / PM: Fix EC polling issue by implementing
prepare_late/finish_early suspend_ops callbacks
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/suspend.c | 6 ++--
drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 9 +++---
include/linux/suspend.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
kernel/power/suspend.c | 18 +++++++----
4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--
1.7.10
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 1/3] PM: Rename prepare_late/wake suspend_ops callbacks to prepare_noirq/finish_noirq
2016-06-28 8:04 [RFC PATCH 0/3] ACPI / PM: Move _PTS/_WAK invocations out of the noirq stage Lv Zheng
@ 2016-06-28 8:04 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-28 8:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] PM: Add prepare_late/finish_early suspend_ops callbacks Lv Zheng
2016-06-28 8:04 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ACPI / PM: Fix EC polling issue by implementing " Lv Zheng
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lv Zheng @ 2016-06-28 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown
Cc: Lv Zheng, Lv Zheng, linux-kernel, linux-acpi
Rename the names of the PM callbacks, making them consistent with their
caller names. Particularly:
.prepare_late -> .prepare_noirq
.wake -> .finish_noirq
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/suspend.c | 6 +++---
drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 8 ++++----
include/linux/suspend.h | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
kernel/power/suspend.c | 8 ++++----
4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/suspend.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/suspend.c
index e76aefa..cc52b0f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/suspend.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/suspend.c
@@ -112,12 +112,12 @@ static int pseries_suspend_enter(suspend_state_t state)
}
/**
- * pseries_prepare_late - Prepare to suspend all other CPUs
+ * pseries_prepare_noirq - Prepare to suspend all other CPUs
*
* Return value:
* 0 on success / other on failure
**/
-static int pseries_prepare_late(void)
+static int pseries_prepare_noirq(void)
{
atomic_set(&suspending, 1);
atomic_set(&suspend_data.working, 0);
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static struct bus_type suspend_subsys = {
static const struct platform_suspend_ops pseries_suspend_ops = {
.valid = suspend_valid_only_mem,
.begin = pseries_suspend_begin,
- .prepare_late = pseries_prepare_late,
+ .prepare_noirq = pseries_prepare_noirq,
.enter = pseries_suspend_enter,
};
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index 7a2e4d4..d30fce7f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -595,9 +595,9 @@ static int acpi_suspend_state_valid(suspend_state_t pm_state)
static const struct platform_suspend_ops acpi_suspend_ops = {
.valid = acpi_suspend_state_valid,
.begin = acpi_suspend_begin,
- .prepare_late = acpi_pm_prepare,
+ .prepare_noirq = acpi_pm_prepare,
.enter = acpi_suspend_enter,
- .wake = acpi_pm_finish,
+ .finish_noirq = acpi_pm_finish,
.end = acpi_pm_end,
};
@@ -623,9 +623,9 @@ static int acpi_suspend_begin_old(suspend_state_t pm_state)
static const struct platform_suspend_ops acpi_suspend_ops_old = {
.valid = acpi_suspend_state_valid,
.begin = acpi_suspend_begin_old,
- .prepare_late = acpi_pm_pre_suspend,
+ .prepare_noirq = acpi_pm_pre_suspend,
.enter = acpi_suspend_enter,
- .wake = acpi_pm_finish,
+ .finish_noirq = acpi_pm_finish,
.end = acpi_pm_end,
.recover = acpi_pm_finish,
};
diff --git a/include/linux/suspend.h b/include/linux/suspend.h
index 7693e39..b5261e3 100644
--- a/include/linux/suspend.h
+++ b/include/linux/suspend.h
@@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ static inline void dpm_save_failed_step(enum suspend_stat_step step)
* appropriate .suspend() method has been executed for each device) and
* before device drivers' late suspend callbacks are executed. It returns
* 0 on success or a negative error code otherwise, in which case the
- * system cannot enter the desired sleep state (@prepare_late(), @enter(),
- * and @wake() will not be called in that case).
+ * system cannot enter the desired sleep state (@prepare_noirq(), @enter(),
+ * and @finish_noirq() will not be called in that case).
*
- * @prepare_late: Finish preparing the platform for entering the system sleep
+ * @prepare_noirq: Finish preparing the platform for entering the system sleep
* state indicated by @begin().
- * @prepare_late is called before disabling nonboot CPUs and after
- * device drivers' late suspend callbacks have been executed. It returns
+ * @prepare_noirq is called before disabling nonboot CPUs and after
+ * device drivers' noirq suspend callbacks have been executed. It returns
* 0 on success or a negative error code otherwise, in which case the
* system cannot enter the desired sleep state (@enter() will not be
* executed).
@@ -138,20 +138,20 @@ static inline void dpm_save_failed_step(enum suspend_stat_step step)
* error code otherwise, in which case the system cannot enter the desired
* sleep state.
*
- * @wake: Called when the system has just left a sleep state, right after
- * the nonboot CPUs have been enabled and before device drivers' early
- * resume callbacks are executed.
+ * @finish_noirq: Called when the system has just left a sleep state, right
+ * after the nonboot CPUs have been enabled and before device drivers'
+ * noirq resume callbacks are executed.
* This callback is optional, but should be implemented by the platforms
- * that implement @prepare_late(). If implemented, it is always called
- * after @prepare_late and @enter(), even if one of them fails.
+ * that implement @prepare_noirq(). If implemented, it is always called
+ * after @prepare_noirq and @enter(), even if one of them fails.
*
* @finish: Finish wake-up of the platform.
* @finish is called right prior to calling device drivers' regular suspend
* callbacks.
* This callback is optional, but should be implemented by the platforms
* that implement @prepare(). If implemented, it is always called after
- * @enter() and @wake(), even if any of them fails. It is executed after
- * a failing @prepare.
+ * @enter() and @finish_noirq(), even if any of them fails. It is executed
+ * after a failing @prepare.
*
* @suspend_again: Returns whether the system should suspend again (true) or
* not (false). If the platform wants to poll sensors or execute some
@@ -177,9 +177,9 @@ struct platform_suspend_ops {
int (*valid)(suspend_state_t state);
int (*begin)(suspend_state_t state);
int (*prepare)(void);
- int (*prepare_late)(void);
+ int (*prepare_noirq)(void);
int (*enter)(suspend_state_t state);
- void (*wake)(void);
+ void (*finish_noirq)(void);
void (*finish)(void);
bool (*suspend_again)(void);
void (*end)(void);
diff --git a/kernel/power/suspend.c b/kernel/power/suspend.c
index 5b70d64..f0a5561 100644
--- a/kernel/power/suspend.c
+++ b/kernel/power/suspend.c
@@ -185,14 +185,14 @@ static int platform_suspend_prepare_late(suspend_state_t state)
static int platform_suspend_prepare_noirq(suspend_state_t state)
{
- return state != PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE && suspend_ops->prepare_late ?
- suspend_ops->prepare_late() : 0;
+ return state != PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE && suspend_ops->prepare_noirq ?
+ suspend_ops->prepare_noirq() : 0;
}
static void platform_resume_noirq(suspend_state_t state)
{
- if (state != PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE && suspend_ops->wake)
- suspend_ops->wake();
+ if (state != PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE && suspend_ops->finish_noirq)
+ suspend_ops->finish_noirq();
}
static void platform_resume_early(suspend_state_t state)
--
1.7.10
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 2/3] PM: Add prepare_late/finish_early suspend_ops callbacks
2016-06-28 8:04 [RFC PATCH 0/3] ACPI / PM: Move _PTS/_WAK invocations out of the noirq stage Lv Zheng
2016-06-28 8:04 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] PM: Rename prepare_late/wake suspend_ops callbacks to prepare_noirq/finish_noirq Lv Zheng
@ 2016-06-28 8:04 ` Lv Zheng
2016-06-28 8:04 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ACPI / PM: Fix EC polling issue by implementing " Lv Zheng
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lv Zheng @ 2016-06-28 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown
Cc: Lv Zheng, Lv Zheng, linux-kernel, linux-acpi
This patch adds prepare_late/finish_early callbacks for suspend_ops.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
---
include/linux/suspend.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
kernel/power/suspend.c | 10 ++++++++--
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/suspend.h b/include/linux/suspend.h
index b5261e3..21e32b8 100644
--- a/include/linux/suspend.h
+++ b/include/linux/suspend.h
@@ -115,14 +115,24 @@ static inline void dpm_save_failed_step(enum suspend_stat_step step)
* This callback is optional. However, if it is implemented, the argument
* passed to @enter() is redundant and should be ignored.
*
- * @prepare: Prepare the platform for entering the system sleep state indicated
- * by @begin().
+ * @prepare: Early preparing the platform for entering the system sleep state
+ * indicated by @begin().
* @prepare() is called right after devices have been suspended (ie. the
* appropriate .suspend() method has been executed for each device) and
* before device drivers' late suspend callbacks are executed. It returns
* 0 on success or a negative error code otherwise, in which case the
- * system cannot enter the desired sleep state (@prepare_noirq(), @enter(),
- * and @finish_noirq() will not be called in that case).
+ * system cannot enter the desired sleep state (@prepare_late,
+ * @prepare_noirq(), @enter(), and @finish_noirq() will not be called in
+ * that case).
+ *
+ * @prepare_late: Late preparing the platform for entering the system sleep
+ * state indicated by @begin().
+ * @prepare_late() is called right after device drivers' late suspend
+ * callbacks have been executed and before device drivers' noirq suspend
+ * callbacks are executed. It returns 0 on success or a negative error
+ * code otherwise, in which case the system cannot enter the desired sleep
+ * state (@prepare_noirq(), @enter(), and @finish_noirq() will not be
+ * called in that case).
*
* @prepare_noirq: Finish preparing the platform for entering the system sleep
* state indicated by @begin().
@@ -145,13 +155,21 @@ static inline void dpm_save_failed_step(enum suspend_stat_step step)
* that implement @prepare_noirq(). If implemented, it is always called
* after @prepare_noirq and @enter(), even if one of them fails.
*
- * @finish: Finish wake-up of the platform.
+ * @finish_early: Early finishing wake-up of the platform.
+ * @finish_early is called right prior to calling device drivers' resume
+ * early callbacks.
+ * This callback is optional, but should be implemented by the platforms
+ * that implement @prepare_late(). If implemented, it is always called
+ * after @enter() and @finish_noirq(), even if any of them fails. It is
+ * executed after a failing @prepare_late.
+ *
+ * @finish: Late finishing wake-up of the platform.
* @finish is called right prior to calling device drivers' regular suspend
* callbacks.
* This callback is optional, but should be implemented by the platforms
* that implement @prepare(). If implemented, it is always called after
- * @enter() and @finish_noirq(), even if any of them fails. It is executed
- * after a failing @prepare.
+ * @enter(), @finish_noirq() and @finish_early, even if any of them fails.
+ * It is executed after a failing @prepare.
*
* @suspend_again: Returns whether the system should suspend again (true) or
* not (false). If the platform wants to poll sensors or execute some
@@ -177,9 +195,11 @@ struct platform_suspend_ops {
int (*valid)(suspend_state_t state);
int (*begin)(suspend_state_t state);
int (*prepare)(void);
+ int (*prepare_late)(void);
int (*prepare_noirq)(void);
int (*enter)(suspend_state_t state);
void (*finish_noirq)(void);
+ void (*finish_early)(void);
void (*finish)(void);
bool (*suspend_again)(void);
void (*end)(void);
diff --git a/kernel/power/suspend.c b/kernel/power/suspend.c
index f0a5561..3a36107 100644
--- a/kernel/power/suspend.c
+++ b/kernel/power/suspend.c
@@ -179,8 +179,12 @@ static int platform_suspend_prepare(suspend_state_t state)
static int platform_suspend_prepare_late(suspend_state_t state)
{
- return state == PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE && freeze_ops && freeze_ops->prepare ?
- freeze_ops->prepare() : 0;
+ if (state == PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE && freeze_ops && freeze_ops->prepare)
+ return freeze_ops->prepare();
+ else if (suspend_ops->prepare_late)
+ return suspend_ops->prepare_late();
+ else
+ return 0;
}
static int platform_suspend_prepare_noirq(suspend_state_t state)
@@ -199,6 +203,8 @@ static void platform_resume_early(suspend_state_t state)
{
if (state == PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE && freeze_ops && freeze_ops->restore)
freeze_ops->restore();
+ else if (suspend_ops->finish_early)
+ suspend_ops->finish_early();
}
static void platform_resume_finish(suspend_state_t state)
--
1.7.10
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH 3/3] ACPI / PM: Fix EC polling issue by implementing prepare_late/finish_early suspend_ops callbacks
2016-06-28 8:04 [RFC PATCH 0/3] ACPI / PM: Move _PTS/_WAK invocations out of the noirq stage Lv Zheng
2016-06-28 8:04 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] PM: Rename prepare_late/wake suspend_ops callbacks to prepare_noirq/finish_noirq Lv Zheng
2016-06-28 8:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] PM: Add prepare_late/finish_early suspend_ops callbacks Lv Zheng
@ 2016-06-28 8:04 ` Lv Zheng
2016-07-16 0:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lv Zheng @ 2016-06-28 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown
Cc: Lv Zheng, Lv Zheng, linux-kernel, linux-acpi
_PTS/_WAK may contain EC transactions, it is better to have them handled
with IRQ enabled. This patch moves the 2 suspend PM ops from noirq stage
to late/early stage.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
index d30fce7f..c5c374c9 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
@@ -595,9 +595,10 @@ static int acpi_suspend_state_valid(suspend_state_t pm_state)
static const struct platform_suspend_ops acpi_suspend_ops = {
.valid = acpi_suspend_state_valid,
.begin = acpi_suspend_begin,
- .prepare_noirq = acpi_pm_prepare,
+ .prepare_late = __acpi_pm_prepare,
+ .prepare_noirq = acpi_pm_pre_suspend,
.enter = acpi_suspend_enter,
- .finish_noirq = acpi_pm_finish,
+ .finish_early = acpi_pm_finish,
.end = acpi_pm_end,
};
--
1.7.10
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] ACPI / PM: Fix EC polling issue by implementing prepare_late/finish_early suspend_ops callbacks
2016-06-28 8:04 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ACPI / PM: Fix EC polling issue by implementing " Lv Zheng
@ 2016-07-16 0:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-19 4:40 ` Zheng, Lv
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2016-07-16 0:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lv Zheng; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Lv Zheng, linux-kernel, linux-acpi
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 04:04:46 PM Lv Zheng wrote:
> _PTS/_WAK may contain EC transactions, it is better to have them handled
> with IRQ enabled. This patch moves the 2 suspend PM ops from noirq stage
> to late/early stage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
There are systems that won't work with this patch applied, so I don't
see a point in applying the other two.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> index d30fce7f..c5c374c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -595,9 +595,10 @@ static int acpi_suspend_state_valid(suspend_state_t pm_state)
> static const struct platform_suspend_ops acpi_suspend_ops = {
> .valid = acpi_suspend_state_valid,
> .begin = acpi_suspend_begin,
> - .prepare_noirq = acpi_pm_prepare,
> + .prepare_late = __acpi_pm_prepare,
> + .prepare_noirq = acpi_pm_pre_suspend,
> .enter = acpi_suspend_enter,
> - .finish_noirq = acpi_pm_finish,
> + .finish_early = acpi_pm_finish,
> .end = acpi_pm_end,
> };
>
>
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [RFC PATCH 3/3] ACPI / PM: Fix EC polling issue by implementing prepare_late/finish_early suspend_ops callbacks
2016-07-16 0:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2016-07-19 4:40 ` Zheng, Lv
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Zheng, Lv @ 2016-07-19 4:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Wysocki, Rafael J, Brown, Len, Lv Zheng, linux-kernel, linux-acpi
Hi, Rafael
> From: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-acpi-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Rafael J. Wysocki
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] ACPI / PM: Fix EC polling issue by
> implementing prepare_late/finish_early suspend_ops callbacks
>
> On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 04:04:46 PM Lv Zheng wrote:
> > _PTS/_WAK may contain EC transactions, it is better to have them
> handled
> > with IRQ enabled. This patch moves the 2 suspend PM ops from noirq
> stage
> > to late/early stage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
>
> There are systems that won't work with this patch applied, so I don't
> see a point in applying the other two.
[Lv Zheng]
I see.
Then instead of moving _WAK/_PTS out of noirq stage, we need to think about tuning the performance of the EC polling mode.
Thanks and best regards
-Lv
>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > index d30fce7f..c5c374c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> > @@ -595,9 +595,10 @@ static int
> acpi_suspend_state_valid(suspend_state_t pm_state)
> > static const struct platform_suspend_ops acpi_suspend_ops = {
> > .valid = acpi_suspend_state_valid,
> > .begin = acpi_suspend_begin,
> > - .prepare_noirq = acpi_pm_prepare,
> > + .prepare_late = __acpi_pm_prepare,
> > + .prepare_noirq = acpi_pm_pre_suspend,
> > .enter = acpi_suspend_enter,
> > - .finish_noirq = acpi_pm_finish,
> > + .finish_early = acpi_pm_finish,
> > .end = acpi_pm_end,
> > };
> >
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-19 4:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-28 8:04 [RFC PATCH 0/3] ACPI / PM: Move _PTS/_WAK invocations out of the noirq stage Lv Zheng
2016-06-28 8:04 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] PM: Rename prepare_late/wake suspend_ops callbacks to prepare_noirq/finish_noirq Lv Zheng
2016-06-28 8:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] PM: Add prepare_late/finish_early suspend_ops callbacks Lv Zheng
2016-06-28 8:04 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ACPI / PM: Fix EC polling issue by implementing " Lv Zheng
2016-07-16 0:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-19 4:40 ` Zheng, Lv
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).