linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Endless Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@endlessm.com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/apic: Handle missing global clockevent gracefully
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 15:46:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1803ad97-74f4-28c6-58c8-c52b3d1e5b1f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908091443030.21433@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

On 2019/8/9 20:54, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Some newer machines do not advertise legacy timers. The kernel can handle
> that situation if the TSC and the CPU frequency are enumerated by CPUID or
> MSRs and the CPU supports TSC deadline timer. If the CPU does not support
> TSC deadline timer the local APIC timer frequency has to be known as well.
> 
> Some Ryzens machines do not advertize legacy timers, but there is no
> reliable way to determine the bus frequency which feeds the local APIC
> timer when the machine allows overclocking of that frequency.

Are these platforms are all ACPI HW-reduced platform?

> 
> As there is no legacy timer the local APIC timer calibration crashes due to
> a NULL pointer dereference when accessing the not installed global clock
> event device.
> 
> Switch the calibration loop to a non interrupt based one, which polls
> either TSC (frequency known) or jiffies. The latter requires a global
> clockevent. As the machines which do not have a global clockevent installed
> have a known TSC frequency this is a non issue. For older machines where
> TSC frequency is not known, there is no known case where the legacy timers
> do not exist as that would have been reported long ago.
> 
> Reported-by: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>
> Reported-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> 
> Note: Only lightly tested, but of course not on an affected machine.
> 
>       If that works reliably, then this needs some exhaustive testing
>       on a wide range of systems so we can risk backports to stable
>       kernels.
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c |   70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  include/linux/acpi_pmtmr.h  |   10 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
> @@ -851,7 +851,8 @@ bool __init apic_needs_pit(void)
>  static int __init calibrate_APIC_clock(void)
>  {
>  	struct clock_event_device *levt = this_cpu_ptr(&lapic_events);
> -	void (*real_handler)(struct clock_event_device *dev);
> +	u64 tsc_perj = 0, tsc_start = 0;
> +	unsigned long jif_start;
>  	unsigned long deltaj;
>  	long delta, deltatsc;
>  	int pm_referenced = 0;
> @@ -878,29 +879,65 @@ static int __init calibrate_APIC_clock(v
>  	apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "Using local APIC timer interrupts.\n"
>  		    "calibrating APIC timer ...\n");
>  
> -	local_irq_disable();
> -
> -	/* Replace the global interrupt handler */
> -	real_handler = global_clock_event->event_handler;
> -	global_clock_event->event_handler = lapic_cal_handler;
> +	/*
> +	 * There are platforms w/o global clockevent devices. Instead of
> +	 * making the calibration conditional on that, use a polling based
> +	 * approach everywhere.
> +	 */
>  
> +	local_irq_disable();
>  	/*
>  	 * Setup the APIC counter to maximum. There is no way the lapic
>  	 * can underflow in the 100ms detection time frame
>  	 */
>  	__setup_APIC_LVTT(0xffffffff, 0, 0);
>  
> -	/* Let the interrupts run */
> -	local_irq_enable();
> +	/*
> +	 * Methods to terminate the calibration loop:
> +	 *  1) Global clockevent if available (jiffies)
> +	 *  2) TSC if available and frequency is known
> +	 */
> +	jif_start = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
> +
> +	if (tsc_khz) {
> +		tsc_start = rdtsc();
> +		tsc_perj = div_u64((u64)tsc_khz * 1000, HZ);
> +	}
> +
> +	while (lapic_cal_loops <= LAPIC_CAL_LOOPS) {

Is this loop still meaningful, can we just invoke the handler twice
before and after the tick?

Thanks,
-Aubrey

> +		/*
> +		 * Enable interrupts so the tick can fire, if a global
> +		 * clockevent device is available
> +		 */
> +		local_irq_enable();
>  
> -	while (lapic_cal_loops <= LAPIC_CAL_LOOPS)
> -		cpu_relax();
> +		/* Wait for a tick to elapse */
> +		while (1) {
> +			if (tsc_khz) {
> +				u64 tsc_now = rdtsc();
> +				if ((tsc_now - tsc_start) >= tsc_perj) {
> +					tsc_start += tsc_perj;
> +					break;
> +				}
> +			} else {
> +				unsigned long jif_now = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
> +
> +				if (time_after(jif_now, jif_start)) {
> +					jif_start = jif_now;
> +					break;
> +				}
> +			}
> +			cpu_relax();
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Invoke the calibration routine */
> +		local_irq_disable();
> +		lapic_cal_handler(NULL);
> +		local_irq_enable();
> +	}
>  
>  	local_irq_disable();
>  
> -	/* Restore the real event handler */
> -	global_clock_event->event_handler = real_handler;
> -
>  	/* Build delta t1-t2 as apic timer counts down */
>  	delta = lapic_cal_t1 - lapic_cal_t2;
>  	apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "... lapic delta = %ld\n", delta);
> @@ -943,10 +980,11 @@ static int __init calibrate_APIC_clock(v
>  	levt->features &= ~CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_DUMMY;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * PM timer calibration failed or not turned on
> -	 * so lets try APIC timer based calibration
> +	 * PM timer calibration failed or not turned on so lets try APIC
> +	 * timer based calibration, if a global clockevent device is
> +	 * available.
>  	 */
> -	if (!pm_referenced) {
> +	if (!pm_referenced && global_clock_event) {
>  		apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "... verify APIC timer\n");
>  
>  		/*
> --- a/include/linux/acpi_pmtmr.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi_pmtmr.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
>  extern u32 acpi_pm_read_verified(void);
>  extern u32 pmtmr_ioport;
>  
> +static inline bool acpi_pm_timer_available(void)
> +{
> +	return pmtmr_ioport != 0;
> +}
> +
>  static inline u32 acpi_pm_read_early(void)
>  {
>  	if (!pmtmr_ioport)
> @@ -28,6 +33,11 @@ static inline u32 acpi_pm_read_early(voi
>  
>  #else
>  
> +static inline bool acpi_pm_timer_available(void)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static inline u32 acpi_pm_read_early(void)
>  {
>  	return 0;
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-12  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-01  6:24 setup_boot_APIC_clock() NULL dereference during early boot on reduced hardware platforms Daniel Drake
2019-08-01  7:16 ` Aubrey Li
2019-08-01  7:35   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01  7:56     ` Aubrey Li
2019-08-01  8:13       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01  8:21         ` Li, Aubrey
2019-08-01 10:13           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01 15:44             ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-08-08 20:36               ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-08 21:01                 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-08-08 21:08                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-08 21:36                     ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-08-09 12:54                       ` [PATCH] x86/apic: Handle missing global clockevent gracefully Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-09 12:59                         ` Jiri Slaby
2019-08-09 13:58                         ` Lendacky, Thomas
2019-08-09 19:40                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-12  6:16                         ` Daniel Drake
2019-08-12  7:03                           ` Jiri Slaby
2019-08-15  5:02                           ` Daniel Drake
2019-08-12  7:46                         ` Li, Aubrey [this message]
2019-08-12 12:24                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-12 12:59                             ` Aubrey Li
2019-08-12 17:11                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-19 10:37                         ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01  9:00   ` setup_boot_APIC_clock() NULL dereference during early boot on reduced hardware platforms Daniel Drake
2019-08-01 10:17     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-01  7:27 ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1803ad97-74f4-28c6-58c8-c52b3d1e5b1f@linux.intel.com \
    --to=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=drake@endlessm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@endlessm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).