linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
	dtatulea@nvidia.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] vhost-vdpa: reset vendor specific mapping to initial state in .release
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 00:35:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1bd79050-8eb5-49f6-9e58-6c7eb3fcab3e@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEtkcyC54M_8A63uBEYjJP+EinLzTk3gP8CQ_rWs0Omt-Q@mail.gmail.com>



On 10/12/2023 8:01 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 5:05 PM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Devices with on-chip IOMMU or vendor specific IOTLB implementation
>> may need to restore iotlb mapping to the initial or default state
>> using the .reset_map op, as it's desirable for some parent devices
>> to solely manipulate mappings by its own, independent of virtio device
>> state. For instance, device reset does not cause mapping go away on
>> such IOTLB model in need of persistent mapping. Before vhost-vdpa
>> is going away, give them a chance to reset iotlb back to the initial
>> state in vhost_vdpa_cleanup().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> index 851535f..a3f8160 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
>> @@ -131,6 +131,15 @@ static struct vhost_vdpa_as *vhost_vdpa_find_alloc_as(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>>          return vhost_vdpa_alloc_as(v, asid);
>>   }
>>
>> +static void vhost_vdpa_reset_map(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u32 asid)
>> +{
>> +       struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
>> +       const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>> +
>> +       if (ops->reset_map)
>> +               ops->reset_map(vdpa, asid);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int vhost_vdpa_remove_as(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u32 asid)
>>   {
>>          struct vhost_vdpa_as *as = asid_to_as(v, asid);
>> @@ -140,6 +149,13 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_remove_as(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u32 asid)
>>
>>          hlist_del(&as->hash_link);
>>          vhost_vdpa_iotlb_unmap(v, &as->iotlb, 0ULL, 0ULL - 1, asid);
>> +       /*
>> +        * Devices with vendor specific IOMMU may need to restore
>> +        * iotlb to the initial or default state which is not done
>> +        * through device reset, as the IOTLB mapping manipulation
>> +        * could be decoupled from the virtio device life cycle.
>> +        */
> Should we do this according to whether IOTLB_PRESIST is set?
Well, in theory this seems like so but it's unnecessary code change 
actually, as that is the way how vDPA parent behind platform IOMMU works 
today, and userspace doesn't break as of today. :)

As explained in previous threads [1][2], when IOTLB_PERSIST is not set 
it doesn't necessarily mean the iotlb will definitely be destroyed 
across reset (think about the platform IOMMU case), so userspace today 
is already tolerating enough with either good or bad IOMMU. This code of 
not checking IOTLB_PERSIST being set is intentional, there's no point to 
emulate bad IOMMU behavior even for older userspace (with improper 
emulation to be done it would result in even worse performance). I think 
the purpose of the IOTLB_PERSIST flag is just to give userspace 100% 
certainty of persistent iotlb mapping not getting lost across vdpa reset.

Thanks,
-Siwei

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/9f118fc9-4f6f-dd67-a291-be78152e47fd@oracle.com/
[2] 
https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/3364adfd-1eb7-8bce-41f9-bfe5473f1f2e@oracle.com/
>   Otherwise
> we may break old userspace.
>
> Thanks
>
>> +       vhost_vdpa_reset_map(v, asid);
>>          kfree(as);
>>
>>          return 0;
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-13  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-10  9:02 [PATCH 0/4] vdpa: decouple reset of iotlb mapping from device reset Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-10  9:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] vdpa: introduce .reset_map operation callback Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-13  2:49   ` Jason Wang
2023-10-13  7:36     ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-16  5:30       ` Jason Wang
2023-10-10  9:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] vhost-vdpa: reset vendor specific mapping to initial state in .release Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-11 11:21   ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-10-12  6:18     ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-13  3:01   ` Jason Wang
2023-10-13  7:35     ` Si-Wei Liu [this message]
2023-10-16  6:32       ` Jason Wang
2023-10-16 11:28         ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-10-16 20:30           ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-17  2:35             ` Jason Wang
2023-10-17 13:58               ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-10-18  4:35               ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-18  5:27                 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-18  7:00                   ` Jason Wang
2023-10-18  8:49                     ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-19  2:53                       ` Jason Wang
2023-10-19  6:46                         ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-19  8:27                           ` Jason Wang
2023-10-19 14:39                             ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-10-19 22:28                               ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-20  4:11                                 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-20  5:57                                   ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-18  8:44                   ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-18 11:14                     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-10-18 23:21                       ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-19  2:48                         ` Jason Wang
2023-10-19 22:57                   ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-16 20:10         ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-10  9:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] vhost-vdpa: introduce IOTLB_PERSIST backend feature bit Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-10  9:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] vdpa/mlx5: implement .reset_map driver op Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-13  3:04   ` Jason Wang
2023-10-13  7:55     ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-11 11:30 ` [PATCH 0/4] vdpa: decouple reset of iotlb mapping from device reset Eugenio Perez Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1bd79050-8eb5-49f6-9e58-6c7eb3fcab3e@oracle.com \
    --to=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).