linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	mst@redhat.com, xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com, dtatulea@nvidia.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] vhost-vdpa: reset vendor specific mapping to initial state in .release
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 15:57:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <695670fd-6762-42d3-b38c-fb347c8beb1d@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEuX8-T6BhbiqkTfF3NBoxS35zQ=k6Th=h0G5sDz4DV93Q@mail.gmail.com>



On 10/17/2023 10:27 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>    If we do
>>> this without a negotiation, IOTLB will not be clear but the Qemu will
>>> try to re-program the IOTLB after reset. Which will break?
>>>
>>> 1) stick the exact old behaviour with just one line of check
>> It's not just one line of check here, the old behavior emulation has to
>> be done as Eugenio illustrated in the other email.
> For vhost-vDPA it's just
>
> if (IOTLB_PERSIST is acked by userspace)
>      reset_map()
... and this reset_map in vhost_vdpa_cleanup can't be negotiable 
depending on IOTLB_PERSIST. Consider the case where user switches to 
virtio-vdpa after an older userspace using vhost-vdpa finished running. 
Even with buggy_virtio_reset_map in place it's unwarranted the vendor 
IOMMU can get back to the default state, e.g. ending with 1:1 
passthrough mapping. If not doing this unconditionally it will get a big 
chance to break userspace.

-Siwei

>
> For parent, it's somehow similar:
>
> during .reset()
>
> if (IOTLB_PERSIST is not acked by userspace)
>          reset_vendor_mappings()
>
> Anything I missed here?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-19 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-10  9:02 [PATCH 0/4] vdpa: decouple reset of iotlb mapping from device reset Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-10  9:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] vdpa: introduce .reset_map operation callback Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-13  2:49   ` Jason Wang
2023-10-13  7:36     ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-16  5:30       ` Jason Wang
2023-10-10  9:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] vhost-vdpa: reset vendor specific mapping to initial state in .release Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-11 11:21   ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-10-12  6:18     ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-13  3:01   ` Jason Wang
2023-10-13  7:35     ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-16  6:32       ` Jason Wang
2023-10-16 11:28         ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-10-16 20:30           ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-17  2:35             ` Jason Wang
2023-10-17 13:58               ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-10-18  4:35               ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-18  5:27                 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-18  7:00                   ` Jason Wang
2023-10-18  8:49                     ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-19  2:53                       ` Jason Wang
2023-10-19  6:46                         ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-19  8:27                           ` Jason Wang
2023-10-19 14:39                             ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-10-19 22:28                               ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-20  4:11                                 ` Jason Wang
2023-10-20  5:57                                   ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-18  8:44                   ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-18 11:14                     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-10-18 23:21                       ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-19  2:48                         ` Jason Wang
2023-10-19 22:57                   ` Si-Wei Liu [this message]
2023-10-16 20:10         ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-10  9:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] vhost-vdpa: introduce IOTLB_PERSIST backend feature bit Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-10  9:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] vdpa/mlx5: implement .reset_map driver op Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-13  3:04   ` Jason Wang
2023-10-13  7:55     ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-10-11 11:30 ` [PATCH 0/4] vdpa: decouple reset of iotlb mapping from device reset Eugenio Perez Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=695670fd-6762-42d3-b38c-fb347c8beb1d@oracle.com \
    --to=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).