From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: groudier@free.fr
Cc: axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrea@suse.de
Subject: Re: [patch] zero-bounce highmem I/O
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 01:12:13 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010816.011213.102576998.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010815205954.A1159-100000@gerard>
In-Reply-To: <20010815.032218.55508716.davem@redhat.com> <20010815205954.A1159-100000@gerard>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain; charset=big5, Size: 831 bytes --]
From: Gérard Roudier <groudier@free.fr>
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 21:20:17 +0200 (CEST)
The current solution consists in tampering the dma_mask in the pci_dev
structure prior to allocating DMAable memory. Not really clean...
Some interface that would allow to provide some masks as argument would be
cleaner, in my opinion. Btw, the pci_set_* interface does not seem cleaner
to me than hacking the corresponding field in the pcidev structure directly.
pci_alloc_consistent will ONLY give you 32-bit DMA memory.
This will be true both before and after my changes. Does the
IA64 gross hack behave differently?
Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
ý:.˱Êâmçë¢kaÉb²ßìzwm
ébïî˱Êâmébìÿêçz_âØ^nr¡ö¦zË\x1aëh¨èÚ&£ûàz¿äz¹Þú+Ê+zf£¢·h§~Ûiÿÿïêÿêçz_è®\x0fæj:+v¨þ)ߣømSåy«\x1eæ¶\x17
\x01\x06ÛiÿÿðÃ\x0fí»\x1fè®\x0fåi\x7f
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-16 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-15 7:50 [patch] zero-bounce highmem I/O Jens Axboe
2001-08-15 9:11 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-15 9:17 ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-15 9:26 ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-15 10:22 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-15 11:13 ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-15 11:47 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-15 12:07 ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-15 12:35 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-15 13:10 ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-15 14:25 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-16 11:51 ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-16 11:56 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-16 12:03 ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-16 12:14 ` Gerd Knorr
2001-08-16 12:27 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-16 12:48 ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-16 12:56 ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-16 13:08 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-16 12:34 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-16 13:35 ` Gerd Knorr
2001-08-16 14:15 ` David S. Miller
2001-08-16 12:28 ` kill alt_address (Re: [patch] zero-bounce highmem I/O) David S. Miller
2001-08-15 14:02 ` [patch] zero-bounce highmem I/O David S. Miller
2001-08-16 5:52 ` Jens Axboe
2001-08-15 19:20 ` Gérard Roudier
2001-08-16 8:12 ` David S. Miller [this message]
[not found] <no.id>
2001-08-16 14:56 ` Alan Cox
2001-08-17 10:18 ` Gerd Knorr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010816.011213.102576998.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=groudier@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).