linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>
To: Kamil Iskra <kamil@science.uva.nl>
Cc: Steve Kieu <haiquy@yahoo.com>, kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Poor floppy performance in kernel 2.4.10
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:28:37 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011018092837.C1144@turbolinux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011017204524.88702.qmail@web10404.mail.yahoo.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110181158060.6306-100000@krakow.science.uva.nl>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110181158060.6306-100000@krakow.science.uva.nl>

On Oct 18, 2001  12:11 +0200, Kamil Iskra wrote:
> So, to reiterate, the conditions known to be necessary to reproduce it
> are: kernel >=2.4.10 (perhaps only the Linus series), small files or
> directory operations, mtools.  The behaviour is as if no caching was done,
> there is a slowdown by a factor of two.  I have this problem both on my
> laptop and on the desktop machine at work.  They are running different
> kernel versions (2.4.12 and 2.4.10), differently configured and compiled
> by two different people.  Kernel 2.4.9 and earlier worked fine.

I think this is a result of the "blockdev in pagecache" change added in
2.4.10.  One of the byproducts of this change is that if a block device
is closed (no other openers) then all of the pages from this device are
dropped from the cache.  In the case of a floppy drive, this is very
important, as you don't want to be cacheing data from one floppy after
you have inserted a new floppy.

In contrast, if you mounted the floppy instead of using mtools, it would
probably have good performance for small files as well.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger  \ "If a man ate a pound of pasta and a pound of antipasto,
                 \  would they cancel out, leaving him still hungry?"
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/               -- Dogbert


  reply	other threads:[~2001-10-18 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-17  7:36 Poor floppy performance in kernel 2.4.10 Kamil Iskra
2001-10-17 20:45 ` Steve Kieu
2001-10-18 10:11   ` Kamil Iskra
2001-10-18 15:28     ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2001-10-18 15:42       ` Kamil Iskra
2001-10-18 16:17         ` Ville Herva
2001-10-18 16:30           ` Nick LeRoy
2001-10-18 19:57             ` bill davidsen
2001-10-18 20:47               ` Nick LeRoy
2001-10-18 20:05             ` bill davidsen
2001-10-18 20:15               ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-18 16:18       ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-18 17:44         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-19  7:50           ` Giuliano Pochini
2001-10-19 13:46             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-19 15:57             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-20  4:20               ` Rob Landley
2001-10-19 16:58 Manfred Spraul
2001-10-21 11:36 Alain Knaff
2001-10-22  9:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-10-22 10:06   ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-22 14:07 ` Nick LeRoy
2001-10-22 18:28 ` bill davidsen
2001-10-27 15:00 Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 15:15 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 17:12   ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 17:42     ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 18:00       ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 18:13         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 18:26         ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-06  7:01         ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:03           ` Alexander Viro
2001-11-06  7:19         ` Richard Gooch
2001-11-06  7:22           ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:13       ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-27 19:19         ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-27 19:26           ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-28 20:40           ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-28 20:57             ` Peter T. Breuer
2001-10-29  5:38               ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-29  6:07                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-10-29  6:34                   ` Alain Knaff
2001-10-28 21:42             ` Alexander Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011018092837.C1144@turbolinux.com \
    --to=adilger@turbolabs.com \
    --cc=haiquy@yahoo.com \
    --cc=kamil@science.uva.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).