linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: 2.5.38-mm3
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 05:42:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020926124244.GO3530@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020926181052.C18906@in.ibm.com>

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 05:29:09AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Is there an update to the files_struct stuff too? I'm seeing large
>> overheads there also.

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 06:10:52PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
> files_struct_rcu is not in mm kernels, but I will upload the most
> recent version to the same download directory in LSE.
> I would be interested in fget() profile count change with that patch.

In my experience fget() is large even on UP kernels. For instance, a UP
profile from a long-running interactive load UP box (my home machine):

228542527 total                                    169.5902
216163353 default_idle                             4503403.1875
850707 number                                   781.8998
829885 handle_IRQ_event                         8644.6354
687351 proc_getdata                             1227.4125
454401 system_call                              8114.3036
446452 csum_partial_copy_generic                1800.2097
330157 tcp_sendmsg                               76.4252
300022 vsnprintf                                284.1117
271134 __generic_copy_to_user                   3389.1750
237151 fget                                     3705.4844
222390 proc_pid_stat                            308.8750
210759 fput                                     878.1625
186408 tcp_ioctl                                314.8784
179146 sys_ioctl                                238.2261
177419 do_softirq                               1232.0764
167881 kmem_cache_free                          1165.8403
154854 skb_clone                                387.1350
149377 d_lookup                                 444.5744
139131 kmem_cache_alloc                         668.8990
138638 kfree                                    866.4875
132555 sys_write                                637.2837

This is only aggravated by cacheline bouncing on SMP. The reductions
of system cpu time will doubtless be beneficial for all.


Thanks,
Bill

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-26 12:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-26  7:57 2.5.38-mm3 Andrew Morton
2002-09-26 12:24 ` 2.5.38-mm3 Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-26 12:29   ` 2.5.38-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-26 12:40     ` 2.5.38-mm3 Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-26 12:42       ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2002-09-26 13:05         ` 2.5.38-mm3 Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-26 13:17           ` 2.5.38-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-26 13:29         ` 2.5.38-mm3 Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-09-26 13:39           ` 2.5.38-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-26 13:46             ` 2.5.38-mm3 Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-09-27  8:27             ` 2.5.38-mm3 Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-27  9:20               ` 2.5.38-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-27  9:58                 ` 2.5.38-mm3 Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-27 15:04                   ` 2.5.38-mm3 Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-27 17:14                     ` 2.5.38-mm3 Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-27 22:54                       ` 2.5.38-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-28  5:41                         ` 2.5.38-mm3 Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-28  4:35                   ` 2.5.38-mm3 Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-09-28  4:36                     ` 2.5.38-mm3 William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-28  4:54                       ` 2.5.38-mm3 Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-09-28  5:29                         ` 2.5.38-mm3 Dipankar Sarma
2002-09-28  4:30                 ` 2.5.38-mm3 Zwane Mwaikambo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020926124244.GO3530@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).