RE:Re: The end of embedded Linux?

RE:Re: The end of embedded Linux?

[Hell.Surfers]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 113 bytes --]

oops didnt see that..

Cheers, Dean.

On 	09 Oct 2002 12:49:48 +0100 	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2460 bytes --]

From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Alexander Kellett <lypanov@kde.org>
Cc: jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: The end of embedded Linux?
Date: 09 Oct 2002 12:49:48 +0100
Message-ID: <1034164188.1253.5.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>

On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 08:37, Alexander Kellett wrote: 
> This talk of adeos reminds me of something that i'd
> "dreamed" of a while back. Whats the feasability of
> having a 70kb kernel that barely even provides support 
> for user space apps and is basically just an hardware 
> abstraction layer for "applications" that can be 
> written as kernel modules?

Its called FreeDOS,

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

OT (Re: Re: The end of embedded Linux?)

[Filip Van Raemdonck]

On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 03:28:32PM +0100, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:
> With-the-way-your-email-client-doesn't-quote-I've-got-no-clue-who wrote:
>> 
>> Its called FreeDOS,
> 
> oops didnt see that..

Pretty useless to reply to such post when you break threading entirely.
Only through reordering by author and by date and figuring out what your
previous post said I've got an idea what you're meaning to say with this
answer.


Regards,

Filip

-- 
Win32 has many known work arounds. For example, Linux.

Re: OT (Re: Re: The end of embedded Linux?)

[jw schultz]

On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 05:14:27PM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 03:28:32PM +0100, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:
> > With-the-way-your-email-client-doesn't-quote-I've-got-no-clue-who wrote:
> >> 
> >> Its called FreeDOS,
> > 
> > oops didnt see that..
> 
> Pretty useless to reply to such post when you break threading entirely.
> Only through reordering by author and by date and figuring out what your
> previous post said I've got an idea what you're meaning to say with this
> answer.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Filip
> 

We are supposed to blame Liberate TVMail 2.6 for all the bad
practices of Hell.Surfers.  It isn't his fault he uses a
product that breaks threads, replies by attachment nor the
fact that he doesn't press the carriage return (enter key).
After all this way he can read his email on TV while reclining on
plush cushions.
</sarcasm>

Actually i had no trouble telling that it was Alan he quoted.
If you turn off header filtering you will see that the
complete mail header (including delivery routing info) is
included in the attachment.

-- 
________________________________________________________________
	J.W. Schultz            Pegasystems Technologies
	email address:		jw@pegasys.ws

		Remember Cernan and Schmitt