* 2.5.69, aar_rx_intr, irq 30: nobody cared!
@ 2003-05-06 9:33 Tommy Wu
2003-05-06 10:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tommy Wu @ 2003-05-06 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: handlers:
May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: [aac_rx_intr+0/212]
May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: irq 30: nobody cared!
May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: Call Trace: [handle_IRQ_event+147/232] [do_IRQ+194/304]
[ common_interrupt+24/32] [try_to_unmap_one+275/368] [bio_put+24/48]
[end_bio_bh_io_sync+33/48] [bio_endio+70/76] [__end_that_request_first+256/464]
[end_that_request_first+23/28] [scsi_end_request+36/160] [scsi_io_completion+561/1100]
[sd_rw_intr+470/480] [scsi_finish_command+208/216] [scsi_softirq+490/516]
[do_softirq+106/200] [do_IRQ+288/304] [default_idle+0/52] [rest_init+0/72]
[common_interrupt+24/32] [default_idle+0/52] [rest_init+0/72] [default_idle+41/52]
[cpu_idle+55/72] [rest_init+69/72] [start_kernel+379/384]
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.5.69, aar_rx_intr, irq 30: nobody cared!
2003-05-06 9:33 2.5.69, aar_rx_intr, irq 30: nobody cared! Tommy Wu
@ 2003-05-06 10:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zwane Mwaikambo @ 2003-05-06 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tommy Wu; +Cc: Linux Kernel
On Tue, 6 May 2003, Tommy Wu wrote:
> May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: handlers:
> May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: [aac_rx_intr+0/212]
> May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: irq 30: nobody cared!
> May 6 13:15:37 test kernel: Call Trace: [handle_IRQ_event+147/232] [do_IRQ+194/304]
> [ common_interrupt+24/32] [try_to_unmap_one+275/368] [bio_put+24/48]
> [end_bio_bh_io_sync+33/48] [bio_endio+70/76] [__end_that_request_first+256/464]
> [end_that_request_first+23/28] [scsi_end_request+36/160] [scsi_io_completion+561/1100]
> [sd_rw_intr+470/480] [scsi_finish_command+208/216] [scsi_softirq+490/516]
> [do_softirq+106/200] [do_IRQ+288/304] [default_idle+0/52] [rest_init+0/72]
> [common_interrupt+24/32] [default_idle+0/52] [rest_init+0/72] [default_idle+41/52]
> [cpu_idle+55/72] [rest_init+69/72] [start_kernel+379/384]
How spurious are these? I just looked at the OIMR programming and i can't
see how this managed to slip by, perhaps someone really doesn't honour
their interrupt disable bit.
--
function.linuxpower.ca
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-06 10:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-06 9:33 2.5.69, aar_rx_intr, irq 30: nobody cared! Tommy Wu
2003-05-06 10:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).