linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
To: andrew.grover@intel.com, hugh@veritas.com, len.brown@intel.com
Cc: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	marcelo@conectiva.com.br
Subject: RE: ACPI patches updated (20030714)
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 11:47:08 +0200 (MEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307160947.h6G9l8iW007259@harpo.it.uu.se> (raw)

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 12:11:17 -0700, "Grover, Andrew" wrote:
>> From: Mikael Pettersson [mailto:mikpe@csd.uu.se] 
>> I would like to see HT_ONLY generalized to parsing the MADT for
>> I/O-APICs. The problem I have is that some mainboards, like my
>> i850 ASUS P4T-E, have I/O-APICs but no MP tables. The only way for
>> the Linux kernel to discover the I/O-APICs on these mainboard is
>> through MADT parsing.
>> 
>> However, this currently requires me to enable all of ACPI, which
>> I don't need or want for many reasons, including code bloat and
>> behavioural side-effects.
>> 
>> Replacing "HT_ONLY" with "MADT_PARSING_ONLY" would be ideal, IMO.
>
>This won't help you. If you have *no* MPS tables, then you need ACPI
>(and specifically the ability to execute the _PRT control methods) for
>interrupt routing information, in addition to ioapic and local apic
>(CPU) enumeration. If this wasn't the case, I'm sure someone would have
>implemented ioapic MADT enumeration code long ago.

:-(

>Also, nothing is going to fundamentally change the size of the ACPI code
>(but we do keep chipping away at it, as evidenced by the dynamic SDT
>patch, -Os, etc.) but I'd like to hear more about the behavioral
>side-effects you'd mentioned, with an eye towards fixing them.

The main side-effect _was_ seeing the interpreter being run.
I didn't know it was needed for figuring out IRQ routing.

Concerning code size, the 70K number in ACPI's Kconfig help is
out of date. A minimal ACPI (all user-selectable suboptions
disabled) adds 145K to my 2.6.0-test1 kernel.

/Mikael

             reply	other threads:[~2003-07-16  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-16  9:47 Mikael Pettersson [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-16 20:55 Mikael Pettersson
2003-07-16 20:36 Grover, Andrew
2003-07-16  2:35 Brown, Len
2003-07-15 19:11 Grover, Andrew
2003-07-15 18:49 Mikael Pettersson
2003-07-15 18:07 Brown, Len
2003-07-15 19:02 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-07-15 17:21 Grover, Andrew
2003-07-15 17:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-07-15 16:53 Grover, Andrew
2003-07-15 17:11 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-07-15 17:57 ` Tugrul Galatali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200307160947.h6G9l8iW007259@harpo.it.uu.se \
    --to=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
    --cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    --subject='RE: ACPI patches updated (20030714)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).