linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	video4linux list <video4linux-list@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] sysfs'ify video4linux
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:59:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030718095920.GA32558@bytesex.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030717214907.GA3255@kroah.com>

On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:49:07PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 06:37:15PM +0200, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> > 
> > Version (1) can be done without breaking the build, with a hack along 
> > the lines "if (no release callback) printk(KERN_WARN please fix your
> > driver)", so the drivers can be fixed step-by-step afterwards.
> 
> That sounds like a nice way to start.
> 
> > Fixing the drivers might be non-trivial through.  Some drivers are
> > hot-pluggable (usb cams), some drivers register more than one v4l device
> > (bttv wants up to three).  Those drivers can't just call kfree() in the
> > ->release callback because there might be other references, some open
> > file handle for a unplugged usb cam, another not-yet unregistered
> > v4l device, whatever.  Probably they must implement some reference
> > counting scheme to get that right.  The very simple ones (in
> > drivers/media/radio for example) likely just need the kfree() moved
> > from the ->remove function into the new ->release() callback.
> 
> I don't think it will be that bad for them.  Just have them change the
> v4l device from being a structure included in their structure, into a
> pointer, and then create it before registering, and free it in the
> release() callback.
> 
> That being said, I haven't actually looked at the code to verify that
> this is all that is needed :)
> 
> > Version (2) needs every v4l driver touched to make it compile again.
> > Not sure how hard it is to fixup them.  I'd guess it is pretty straigt
> > forward to do the conversion, it's just alot of work.  I also could do
> > a number of other cleanups along the way.  Maybe I trap into some hidden
> > pitfalls through, havn't looked at all the drivers in detail yet.
> 
> Breaking the build is a very good thing to do at times, to ensure that
> stuff gets fixed properly.  Users might go for a while without realizing
> that there really is a problem in their driver.
> 
> But in the end, it's up to you...
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

-- 
sigfault

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-18  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-15 14:31 [RFC/PATCH] sysfs'ify video4linux Gerd Knorr
2003-07-15 15:21 ` Ronald Bultje
2003-07-15 16:19   ` Matt Porter
2003-07-15 21:27 ` Greg KH
2003-07-16  8:44   ` Gerd Knorr
2003-07-16 16:19     ` Greg KH
2003-07-16 20:20       ` Gerd Knorr
2003-07-16 21:08         ` Greg KH
2003-07-17 12:01           ` Gerd Knorr
2003-07-17 14:57             ` Greg KH
2003-07-17 16:37               ` Gerd Knorr
2003-07-17 21:49                 ` Greg KH
2003-07-18  9:59                   ` Gerd Knorr [this message]
     [not found]                     ` <20030718234359.GK1583@kroah.com>
2003-07-21  7:28                       ` Gerd Knorr
2003-07-21  7:55                         ` Ronald Bultje
2003-07-21 15:43                         ` [RFC/PATCH] 1/2 v4l: sysfs'ify video4linux core Gerd Knorr
2003-07-21 15:47                           ` [RFC/PATCH] 2/2 v4l: sysfs'ify bttv driver Gerd Knorr
2003-07-21 16:27                           ` [RFC/PATCH] 1/2 v4l: sysfs'ify video4linux core Greg KH
2003-07-16 13:33   ` [RFC/PATCH] sysfs'ify video4linux Mark McClelland
2003-07-16 14:10     ` root
2003-07-16 16:23     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030718095920.GA32558@bytesex.org \
    --to=kraxel@bytesex.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).