From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Ihar Philips Filipau <filia@softhome.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: OT: Vanilla not for embedded?! Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()?
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:46:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030725204613.GB1686@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F214EC3.9010804@softhome.net>
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:37:39PM +0200, Ihar Philips Filipau wrote:
> P.S. Offtopic. As I see it Linux & Linus have made the decision of
> optimization. Linux after all is capitalismus creation: who has more
> money do control everything. Server market has more money - they do more
> work on kernel and they systems are not that far from developers'
> workstations - so Linux gets more and more server/workstation oriented.
> This will fit desktop market too - if your computer was made to run
> WinXP AKA exp(bloat) - it will be capable to run any OS. Linus repeating
> 'small is beatiful' sounds more and more like crude joke...
> As for embedded market - it is already in deep fork and far far away
> from vanilla kernels... Vanilla really not that relevant to real world...
Vanilla will be what people put into it. And I have seen more messages from
embedded people complaining, than actually doing and submitting patches for
merging.
So the embedded trees are a deep fork huh? Did you or anyone else do
anything to merge during 2.5?!
And now you see why there is a "deep" fork...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-25 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <d2nx.4QV.15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dbTZ.5Z5.19@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-07-25 15:37 ` [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()? Ihar "Philips" Filipau
2003-07-25 20:46 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2003-07-25 20:43 ` OT: Vanilla not for embedded?! " Andre Hedrick
2003-07-27 11:57 ` Ihar "Philips" Filipau
2003-07-27 13:05 ` Francois Romieu
[not found] <dcQ9.7aj.35@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dcQ9.7aj.31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dhFS.3R3.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dSm7.4TZ.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dTrN.5Te.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-07-27 14:33 ` Ihar "Philips" Filipau
[not found] <dUQT.72E.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dUQT.72E.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dUQT.72E.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dUQT.72E.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dUQT.72E.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dUQT.72E.3@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-07-27 14:47 ` Ihar "Philips" Filipau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030725204613.GB1686@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=filia@softhome.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).