From: Andre Hedrick <email@example.com> To: Mike Fedyk <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Ihar Philips Filipau <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: OT: Vanilla not for embedded?! Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()? Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:43:16 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20030725204613.GB1686@matchmail.com> Where is the "deep" fork storaged, sounds interesting! At lets it should buisness friendly. -a On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 05:37:39PM +0200, Ihar Philips Filipau wrote: > > P.S. Offtopic. As I see it Linux & Linus have made the decision of > > optimization. Linux after all is capitalismus creation: who has more > > money do control everything. Server market has more money - they do more > > work on kernel and they systems are not that far from developers' > > workstations - so Linux gets more and more server/workstation oriented. > > This will fit desktop market too - if your computer was made to run > > WinXP AKA exp(bloat) - it will be capable to run any OS. Linus repeating > > 'small is beatiful' sounds more and more like crude joke... > > As for embedded market - it is already in deep fork and far far away > > from vanilla kernels... Vanilla really not that relevant to real world... > > Vanilla will be what people put into it. And I have seen more messages from > embedded people complaining, than actually doing and submitting patches for > merging. > > So the embedded trees are a deep fork huh? Did you or anyone else do > anything to merge during 2.5?! > > And now you see why there is a "deep" fork... > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-25 20:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <d2nx.4QV.email@example.com> [not found] ` <dbTZ.5Z5.firstname.lastname@example.org> 2003-07-25 15:37 ` [uClinux-dev] " Ihar "Philips" Filipau 2003-07-25 20:46 ` OT: Vanilla not for embedded?! " Mike Fedyk 2003-07-25 20:43 ` Andre Hedrick [this message] 2003-07-27 11:57 ` Ihar "Philips" Filipau 2003-07-27 13:05 ` Francois Romieu [not found] <dcQ9.email@example.com> [not found] ` <dcQ9.firstname.lastname@example.org> [not found] ` <dhFS.3R3.email@example.com> [not found] ` <dSm7.4TZ.firstname.lastname@example.org> [not found] ` <dTrN.5Te.email@example.com> 2003-07-27 14:33 ` Ihar "Philips" Filipau [not found] <dUQT.72E.firstname.lastname@example.org> [not found] ` <dUQT.72E.email@example.com> [not found] ` <dUQT.72E.firstname.lastname@example.org> [not found] ` <dUQT.72E.email@example.com> [not found] ` <dUQT.72E.firstname.lastname@example.org> [not found] ` <dUQT.72E.email@example.com> 2003-07-27 14:47 ` Ihar "Philips" Filipau
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: OT: Vanilla not for embedded?'\!' Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()?' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).