linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj@urpla.net>
To: Nick Urbanik <nicku@vtc.edu.hk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Single P4, many IDE PCI cards == trouble??
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 14:43:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308311443.55543.hpj@urpla.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F4F5C9A.5BAA1542@vtc.edu.hk>

Hi Nick,

On Friday 29 August 2003 16:00, Nick Urbanik wrote:
>
> Performance is a relatively minor issue compared with stability and
> low cost.
>
> Is there _anyone_ who is using a number of ATA133 IDE disks (>=6),
> each on its own IDE channel, on a number of PCI IDE cards, and
> doing so successfully and reliably?  I begin to suspect not!  If
> so, please tell us what motherboard, IDE cards you are using.  I
> used to imagine that a terabyte of RAID storage on one P4 machine
> with ordinary cheap IDE cards with software RAID would be feasible.
>  I believe it is not (although I cannot afford to play musical
> motherboards).

It is. I'm running several pretty stable systems with IDE SW RAID 5
on top of Promise TX2/100 (~30 Eur) controllers. There was a long
standing limit of two cards from this type, which seems to be removed
lately (as Alan stated). At least, the test system hasn't fallen on 
it's face, when adding a third controller, and attached devices acted
as expected without freezing, throwing DMA errors, and the like.

Of course, the usual "don't buy the latest and greatest hardware, 
if the manufacturer isn't fully commited to linux support" applies.
Promise isn't!

Pete

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-31 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-29  0:49 Single P4, many IDE PCI cards == trouble?? Nick Urbanik
2003-08-29  9:50 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-29 14:00   ` Nick Urbanik
2003-08-29 14:22     ` lk
2003-08-29 14:38     ` Alan Cox
2003-08-29 21:14       ` Erik Andersen
2003-08-30  3:46       ` Nick Urbanik
2003-09-08  6:13         ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-08 17:20           ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-08-29 15:13     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-08-31 12:43     ` Hans-Peter Jansen [this message]
2003-08-31 15:46       ` joe briggs
2003-08-31 23:41       ` Nick Urbanik
2003-09-01  6:01         ` many IDE PCI cards "spurious 8259a" irq15(SMBus nforce2) Resident Boxholder
2003-09-01  7:51           ` Alan Cox
2003-09-01 10:14             ` IDE PCI cards IOAPIC " Resident Boxholder
2003-09-06 12:44 ` Single P4, many IDE PCI cards == trouble?? Steve Bromwich
2003-10-22 16:36 Alex Finch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200308311443.55543.hpj@urpla.net \
    --to=hpj@urpla.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicku@vtc.edu.hk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).