From: Nick Urbanik <nicku@vtc.edu.hk>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Single P4, many IDE PCI cards == trouble??
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 22:00:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F4F5C9A.5BAA1542@vtc.edu.hk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1062150643.26753.4.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk
Dear Folks,
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Gwe, 2003-08-29 at 01:49, Nick Urbanik wrote:
> > Dear Folks,
> >
> > With a single 2.26GHz P4, an Asus P4B533-E motherboard, is it possible
> > to reliably use two additional PCI IDE cards (using SI680), one hard
> > disk per channel, and have the thing work reliably?
>
> You should be able to, although with software raid your PCI bandwidth
> limits will limit the ultimate performance for mirroring/raid
Performance is a relatively minor issue compared with stability and low
cost.
Is there _anyone_ who is using a number of ATA133 IDE disks (>=6), each on
its own IDE channel, on a number of PCI IDE cards, and doing so
successfully and reliably? I begin to suspect not! If so, please tell us
what motherboard, IDE cards you are using. I used to imagine that a
terabyte of RAID storage on one P4 machine with ordinary cheap IDE cards
with software RAID would be feasible. I believe it is not (although I
cannot afford to play musical motherboards).
> > My machine locks solid at unpredictable intervals with no response
> > from keyboard lights, no Alt-Sysrq-x response, etc, with a wide
> > variety of 2.4.x kernels, including 2.4.22.
>
> A freeze in an IRQ handler would cause that kind of thing, turning on
> the NMI watchdog might get you a trace in such a failure case - and
> that would help.
If the NMI count is positive in /proc/interrupts, and I have nmi_watchdog=2
in /proc/cmdline, does that mean that the NMI watchdog is turned on? If
so, it never yielded anything: the machine also never responded to keyboard
lights, Alt-Sysrq-s, etc. I have a serial terminal (minicom on an old 486
with a capture log running) as my console, since I want to catch the
culprit. I always checked console output up to the lock up.
$ sudo grep -c 'syslogd 1.4.1: restart.' messages*
messages:13
messages.1:9
messages.2:4
messages.3:6
messages.4:4
That's a lot of locking up!
A careful look through the output of
$ sudo grep -B10 'syslogd 1.4.1: restart.' messages*
shows no output from the watchdog.
I am giving up now, and have shelled out big dollars for a 3ware 7506-8,
which I will install early next week once I've figured out how to back up
and restore 203GB without shelling out even more money.
I am honoured by your reply! Have fun with the MBA.
--
Nick Urbanik RHCE nicku(at)vtc.edu.hk
Dept. of Information & Communications Technology
Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Tsing Yi)
Tel: (852) 2436 8576, (852) 2436 8713 Fax: (852) 2436 8526
PGP: 53 B6 6D 73 52 EE 1F EE EC F8 21 98 45 1C 23 7B ID: 7529555D
GPG: 7FFA CDC7 5A77 0558 DC7A 790A 16DF EC5B BB9D 2C24 ID: BB9D2C24
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-29 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-29 0:49 Single P4, many IDE PCI cards == trouble?? Nick Urbanik
2003-08-29 9:50 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-29 14:00 ` Nick Urbanik [this message]
2003-08-29 14:22 ` lk
2003-08-29 14:38 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-29 21:14 ` Erik Andersen
2003-08-30 3:46 ` Nick Urbanik
2003-09-08 6:13 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-08 17:20 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-08-29 15:13 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-08-31 12:43 ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2003-08-31 15:46 ` joe briggs
2003-08-31 23:41 ` Nick Urbanik
2003-09-01 6:01 ` many IDE PCI cards "spurious 8259a" irq15(SMBus nforce2) Resident Boxholder
2003-09-01 7:51 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-01 10:14 ` IDE PCI cards IOAPIC " Resident Boxholder
2003-09-06 12:44 ` Single P4, many IDE PCI cards == trouble?? Steve Bromwich
2003-10-22 16:36 Alex Finch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F4F5C9A.5BAA1542@vtc.edu.hk \
--to=nicku@vtc.edu.hk \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).