* 2.6.x breaks some Berkeley/Sleepycat DB functionality
@ 2004-01-12 17:16 Dan Egli
2004-01-12 17:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dan Egli @ 2004-01-12 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have encountered a strange issue in 2.6.0 and 2.6.1
I run a PGP Public key server on this machine and under 2.4.x it's
"smooth as silk". But if I boot under 2.6.x, it's gaurenteed failure. If
I try to build a database using the build command (this is an sks
server, so it's sks build or sks fastbuild) I IMMEDIATELY get Bdb
error. But the exact same command with the exact same libraries and
input files under 2.4.20 works without a hitch.
Anyone got any ideas? Anything else I can provide to assist in debugging?
- --- Dan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAAtZctwT22Jak4/4RAk+nAJ4tclsoZTI/a2LAwxb81KOrPxHLhQCcDxoP
Dlbr7aZabky+CeBGD9TnjY4=
=dr0q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.x breaks some Berkeley/Sleepycat DB functionality
2004-01-12 17:16 2.6.x breaks some Berkeley/Sleepycat DB functionality Dan Egli
@ 2004-01-12 17:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-12 17:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-13 9:53 ` Nikita Danilov
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2004-01-12 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Egli; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 882 bytes --]
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 18:16, Dan Egli wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have encountered a strange issue in 2.6.0 and 2.6.1
>
> I run a PGP Public key server on this machine and under 2.4.x it's
> "smooth as silk". But if I boot under 2.6.x, it's gaurenteed failure. If
> I try to build a database using the build command (this is an sks
> server, so it's sks build or sks fastbuild) I IMMEDIATELY get Bdb
> error. But the exact same command with the exact same libraries and
> input files under 2.4.20 works without a hitch.
>
> Anyone got any ideas? Anything else I can provide to assist in debugging?
this might be the same issue that hit some rpm versions; some versions
of db4 seem to detect the O_DIRECT header presence and starts using
O_DIRECT, without honoring the alignment requirements linux puts on
O_DIRECT usage...
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.x breaks some Berkeley/Sleepycat DB functionality
2004-01-12 17:16 2.6.x breaks some Berkeley/Sleepycat DB functionality Dan Egli
2004-01-12 17:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
@ 2004-01-12 17:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-13 9:53 ` Nikita Danilov
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Valdis.Kletnieks @ 2004-01-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Egli; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 736 bytes --]
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:16:12 MST, Dan Egli <dan@eglifamily.dnsalias.net> said:
> I run a PGP Public key server on this machine and under 2.4.x it's
> "smooth as silk". But if I boot under 2.6.x, it's gaurenteed failure. If
> I try to build a database using the build command (this is an sks
> server, so it's sks build or sks fastbuild) I IMMEDIATELY get Bdb
> error. But the exact same command with the exact same libraries and
> input files under 2.4.20 works without a hitch.
>
> Anyone got any ideas? Anything else I can provide to assist in debugging?
Off the top of my head, O_DIRECT horkage? I believe that 2.6 has more
stringent buffer alignment requirements. A quick 'strace' would probably show
if that's the problem.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.x breaks some Berkeley/Sleepycat DB functionality
2004-01-12 17:16 2.6.x breaks some Berkeley/Sleepycat DB functionality Dan Egli
2004-01-12 17:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-12 17:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
@ 2004-01-13 9:53 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-01-13 10:10 ` Oleg Drokin
2004-01-13 17:14 ` dan
2 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nikita Danilov @ 2004-01-13 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Egli
Cc: linux-kernel,
ОлегДрокин
Dan Egli writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have encountered a strange issue in 2.6.0 and 2.6.1
>
> I run a PGP Public key server on this machine and under 2.4.x it's
> "smooth as silk". But if I boot under 2.6.x, it's gaurenteed failure. If
> I try to build a database using the build command (this is an sks
> server, so it's sks build or sks fastbuild) I IMMEDIATELY get Bdb
> error. But the exact same command with the exact same libraries and
> input files under 2.4.20 works without a hitch.
>
> Anyone got any ideas? Anything else I can provide to assist in debugging?
On top of what file system berkdb is created? I have a reminiscence that
Sleepy Cat used to have a problem with reiserfs, due to large
stat->st_blksize value. Oleg do you remember this?
>
> - --- Dan
Nikita.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.x breaks some Berkeley/Sleepycat DB functionality
2004-01-13 9:53 ` Nikita Danilov
@ 2004-01-13 10:10 ` Oleg Drokin
2004-01-13 17:14 ` dan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Drokin @ 2004-01-13 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikita Danilov; +Cc: Dan Egli, linux-kernel
Hello!
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 12:53:16PM +0300, Nikita Danilov wrote:
> > I run a PGP Public key server on this machine and under 2.4.x it's
> > "smooth as silk". But if I boot under 2.6.x, it's gaurenteed failure. If
> > I try to build a database using the build command (this is an sks
> > server, so it's sks build or sks fastbuild) I IMMEDIATELY get Bdb
> > error. But the exact same command with the exact same libraries and
> > input files under 2.4.20 works without a hitch.
> > Anyone got any ideas? Anything else I can provide to assist in debugging?
> On top of what file system berkdb is created? I have a reminiscence that
> Sleepy Cat used to have a problem with reiserfs, due to large
> stat->st_blksize value. Oleg do you remember this?
No, that problem was different. And it was believed that BErkeley DB might just
be performing a bit slower on reiserfs, though I never was able to reproduce and
Sleepycat's code contains it own limit on maximal block size (it uses 16k
blocksize if on suggested by FS is bigger that 16k).
Definitely there were no crashes.
Bye,
Oleg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.x breaks some Berkeley/Sleepycat DB functionality
2004-01-13 9:53 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-01-13 10:10 ` Oleg Drokin
@ 2004-01-13 17:14 ` dan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dan @ 2004-01-13 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nikita Danilov
Cc: linux-kernel,
ОлегДрокин
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Nikita Danilov wrote:
> On top of what file system berkdb is created? I have a reminiscence that
> Sleepy Cat used to have a problem with reiserfs, due to large
> stat->st_blksize value. Oleg do you remember this?
ext3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-13 17:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-12 17:16 2.6.x breaks some Berkeley/Sleepycat DB functionality Dan Egli
2004-01-12 17:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-01-12 17:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-13 9:53 ` Nikita Danilov
2004-01-13 10:10 ` Oleg Drokin
2004-01-13 17:14 ` dan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).