From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Eric Whiting <ewhiting@amis.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -mmX 4G patches feedback
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 19:46:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040405174616.GH2234@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40718B2A.967D9467@amis.com>
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:36:58AM -0600, Eric Whiting wrote:
> The 4G/4G patch is still useful for me -- although 64bit linux (x86_64) is the
> best 'real' long-term solution to large memory jobs.
what's your primary limitation? physical memory or virtual address
space? if it's physical memory go with 2.6-aa and it'll work fine up to
32G boxes included at full cpu performance.
if it's virtual address space and you've not much more than 4G of ram
3.5:1.5 usually works fine, and againt you'll run at full cpu
performance.
also make sure to move the task_unmapped_base at around 200M, so that
you get 1G more of address space for free.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-05 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-05 16:36 -mmX 4G patches feedback Eric Whiting
2004-04-05 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2004-04-05 21:35 ` Eric Whiting
2004-04-05 22:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 11:55 ` -mmX 4G patches feedback [numbers: how much performance impact] Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 14:49 ` Eric Whiting
2004-04-06 15:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 16:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-04-06 16:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 17:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 17:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 22:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 22:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 19:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 20:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 6:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07 7:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07 21:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 17:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07 21:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 22:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 23:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 23:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 23:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 23:34 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 0:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 6:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 21:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 22:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 22:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 23:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 23:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 23:42 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 23:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 21:19 ` -mmX 4G patches feedback Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 21:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040405174616.GH2234@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ewhiting@amis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).