From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>, Eric Whiting <ewhiting@amis.com>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -mmX 4G patches feedback
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:19:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68580000.1081372758@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040405221641.GN2234@dualathlon.random>
Tuesday, April 06, 2004 00:16:41 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:35:23PM -0600, Eric Whiting wrote:
>> 4G of virtual address is what we need. Virtual address space is why the -mmX
>> 4G/4G patches are useful. In this application it is single processes (usually
>
> Indeed.
>
>> 3.5:1.5 appears to be a 2.4.x kernel patch only right?
>
> Martin has a port for 2.6 in the -mjb patchset (though it only works
> with PAE disabled but there are patches floating around to make it work
> at not noticeable cost with PAE enabled too).
There's no such thing as 3.5:1.5. Do you mean 3.5:0.5? or 2.5:1.5? ;-)
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-07 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-05 16:36 -mmX 4G patches feedback Eric Whiting
2004-04-05 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-05 21:35 ` Eric Whiting
2004-04-05 22:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 11:55 ` -mmX 4G patches feedback [numbers: how much performance impact] Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 14:49 ` Eric Whiting
2004-04-06 15:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 16:13 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-04-06 16:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 17:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 17:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 22:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 22:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 19:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 20:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 6:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 6:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07 7:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07 21:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 17:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-07 21:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 22:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 23:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 23:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-07 23:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 23:34 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 0:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 6:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 21:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 22:19 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 22:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 23:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 23:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 23:42 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-04-08 23:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 21:19 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2004-04-07 21:49 ` -mmX 4G patches feedback Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68580000.1081372758@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=ewhiting@amis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).