From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: serue@us.ibm.com
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>, Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>,
serge@hallyn.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@us.ibm.com>,
David Safford <safford@watson.ibm.com>,
Reiner Sailer <sailer@us.ibm.com>,
Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] securityfs
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:22:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050706222237.GB6696@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050706220835.GA32005@serge.austin.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 05:08:35PM -0500, serue@us.ibm.com wrote:
> Quoting Greg KH (greg@kroah.com):
> > think it could be made even smaller if you use the default read and
> > write file type functions in libfs (look at the debugfs wrappers of them
> > for u8, u16, etc, for examples of how to use them.)
>
> The attached patch cleans up the securelevel code for the seclvl file.
> Is this a reasonable way to go about this?
No.
> Or is there a better way to do this?
Look at how debugfs uses the libfs code. We should not need to add
these handlers to securityfs.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-06 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-30 19:44 [patch 0/12] lsm stacking v0.2: intro serue
2005-06-30 19:48 ` [patch 1/12] lsm stacking v0.2: don't default to dummy_##hook serue
2005-06-30 19:48 ` [patch 2/12] lsm stacking v0.2: replace void* security with hlist serue
2005-06-30 19:49 ` [patch 3/12] lsm stacking v0.2: introduce security_*_value API serue
2005-06-30 19:49 ` [patch 4/12] lsm stacking v0.2: stacker documentation serue
2005-06-30 19:50 ` [patch 5/12] lsm stacking v0.2: actual stacker module serue
2005-07-01 2:32 ` James Morris
2005-07-01 19:24 ` serge
2005-07-01 20:35 ` Greg KH
2005-07-03 0:24 ` serge
2005-07-03 18:25 ` Tony Jones
2005-07-03 18:53 ` James Morris
2005-07-03 19:09 ` Tony Jones
2005-07-03 20:44 ` [PATCH] securityfs Greg KH
2005-07-04 12:39 ` serge
2005-07-04 15:53 ` serge
2005-07-05 6:07 ` Greg KH
2005-07-06 12:25 ` serge
2005-07-06 6:52 ` James Morris
2005-07-06 7:04 ` Greg KH
2005-07-06 12:29 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-07-06 15:35 ` James Morris
2005-07-06 16:06 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-07-06 16:16 ` Greg KH
2005-07-06 18:01 ` Chris Wright
2005-07-06 22:08 ` serue
2005-07-06 22:22 ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-07-06 23:32 ` serge
2005-07-07 17:30 ` serge
2005-07-07 17:48 ` Greg KH
2005-07-07 18:27 ` serue
2005-07-07 22:46 ` serge
2005-07-07 23:06 ` Greg KH
2005-07-07 23:12 ` serue
2005-07-08 20:44 ` serue
2005-07-08 20:49 ` Greg KH
2005-07-08 21:03 ` Chris Wright
2005-07-04 3:18 ` [patch 5/12] lsm stacking v0.2: actual stacker module Tony Jones
2005-07-04 11:51 ` serge
2005-07-04 19:37 ` Tony Jones
2005-07-04 20:06 ` serge
2005-07-04 20:41 ` Tony Jones
2005-07-05 18:17 ` serge
2005-07-08 21:43 ` serue
2005-07-08 22:12 ` serue
2005-07-11 14:40 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-07-11 17:51 ` serue
2005-07-11 19:03 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-07-13 16:39 ` serue
2005-07-13 18:27 ` serue
2005-06-30 19:51 ` [patch 6/12] lsm stacking v0.2: stackable capability lsm serue
2005-06-30 19:52 ` [patch 7/12] lsm stacking v0.2: selinux: update security structs serue
2005-06-30 19:53 ` [patch 8/12] lsm stacking v0.2: selinux: use security_*_value API serue
2005-06-30 19:53 ` [patch 9/12] lsm stacking v0.2: selinux: remove secondary support serue
2005-06-30 19:54 ` [patch 10/12] lsm stacking v0.2: hook completeness verification serue
2005-06-30 19:55 ` [patch 11/12] lsm stacking v0.2: /proc/$$/attr/ sharing serue
2005-06-30 19:55 ` [patch 12/12] lsm stacking v0.2: update seclvl for stacking serue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050706222237.GB6696@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=gh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhalcrow@us.ibm.com \
--cc=safford@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=sailer@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=tonyj@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).