linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: yhlu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>,
	linville@tuxdriver.com,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: mthca and LinuxBIOS
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 16:03:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050805230300.GA4363@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c4405080515257ddaa8d2@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 03:25:02PM -0700, yhlu wrote:
> In LinuxBIOS, We can allocate 64 bit region ( 0xfc0000000....) to the
> mellanox Infiniband card. Some range above 4G.  So the mmio below 4G
> is some smaller only 128M, Otherwise need 512M. If 4 IB cards are
> used, the mmio will be 2G. For new opteron E stepping, We could use
> hareware memhole support. But if the CPU is before opteron E, We only
> can use SW mem mapping ( will lose some performance) or lose (2G RAM).
> at such case We need 64bit pref mem. We only lose 128M even four IB
> card are installed.
> 
> yesterday, someone add pci_restore_bars...., that will call
> pci_update_resource, and it will overwirte upper 32 bit of BAR2 and
> BAR4 of IB card.

Hm, perhaps that change should not do this?

Dominik, care to weigh in here?  That was your patch...

> So the patch make pci_restore_resource
> 1. don't touch BAR3, and BAR5, if BAR2, and BAR4 are 64 bit MEM IO
> 2. not assume BAR2 and BAR4 upper 32bit is 0 if if BAR2, and BAR4 are
> 64 bit MEM IO


thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2005-08-05 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-28 20:31 [PATCH 0/2] REALLY final InfiniBand updates for 2.6.13 Roland Dreier
2005-07-28 20:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] [IB/cm]: Correct CM port redirect reject codes Roland Dreier
2005-07-28 20:31   ` [PATCH 2/2] [IPoIB] Handle sending of unicast RARP responses Roland Dreier
2005-08-04  0:58   ` [PATCH 1/2] [IB/cm]: Correct CM port redirect reject codes yhlu
2005-08-04  1:39     ` [openib-general] " Grant Grundler
2005-08-04  4:44     ` mthca and LinuxBIOS (was: [PATCH 1/2] [IB/cm]: Correct CM port redirect reject codes) Roland Dreier
2005-08-04 16:33       ` yhlu
2005-08-04 16:36         ` mthca and LinuxBIOS Roland Dreier
2005-08-04 17:23           ` yhlu
2005-08-04 18:01             ` yhlu
2005-08-04 18:35               ` Roland Dreier
2005-08-04 19:30                 ` yhlu
2005-08-05  3:47                   ` Roland Dreier
2005-08-05 18:03                     ` yhlu
2005-08-05 18:07                       ` yhlu
2005-08-05 18:13                         ` Roland Dreier
2005-08-05 18:26                           ` yhlu
2005-08-05 19:25                             ` yhlu
2005-08-05 19:45                               ` yhlu
2005-08-05 20:28                                 ` yhlu
2005-08-05 20:38                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-05 22:00                                     ` Greg KH
2005-08-05 22:25                                       ` yhlu
2005-08-05 23:03                                         ` Greg KH [this message]
2005-08-06  5:29                                           ` [openib-general] " Grant Grundler
2005-08-05 23:06                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-08-05 23:59                                         ` [openib-general] " Grant Grundler
2005-08-06  4:33                                           ` Grant Grundler
2005-08-06 23:52                                             ` yhlu
2005-08-07  9:49                                             ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2005-08-05 18:11                       ` Roland Dreier
2005-08-06  0:57                       ` yhlu
2005-08-06  1:30                         ` Roland Dreier
2005-08-06  2:47                           ` yhlu
2005-08-04  6:42     ` [PATCH 1/2] [IB/cm]: Correct CM port redirect reject codes Michael S. Tsirkin
2005-08-04 18:22       ` yhlu
2005-08-08 12:21         ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050805230300.GA4363@suse.de \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=openib-general@openib.org \
    --cc=rolandd@cisco.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).