From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: lsscsi-0.17 released
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:34:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060222163426.GG28587@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43FC90E4.10805@torque.net>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:27:16AM -0500, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Matthias Andree wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >>Matthias Andree wrote:
> >>>Does this work around new incompatibilities in the kernel
> >>>or does this fix lsscsi bugs?
> >>
> >>The former. In lk 2.6.16-rc1 the
> >>/sys/class/scsi_device/<hcil>/device/block symlink
> >>changed to ".../block:sd<x>" breaking lsscsi 0.16 (and
> >>earlier) and sg_map26 (in sg3_utils).
> >
> > Heck, what was the reason for breaking userspace again?
>
> Maybe the person responsible can answer. I'm only reacting
> to a change that broke two of my utilities.
Probably better to cc the person responsible if you want an answer.
> > Why would someone even consider using sysfs at all if it changes
> > incompatibly?
>
> Indeed.
There seems to be no committment to making sysfs a stable part of the
kernel API. Which is really just another way of saying "we can't be
bothered to design it upfront, we'll just let it evolve into a mess
and then try to fix it afterwards".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-22 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-21 23:39 lsscsi-0.17 released Douglas Gilbert
2006-02-22 8:50 ` Matthias Andree
2006-02-22 15:01 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-02-22 16:06 ` Matthias Andree
2006-02-22 16:27 ` Douglas Gilbert
2006-02-22 16:34 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2006-02-22 16:38 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-02-22 17:14 ` Greg KH
2006-02-22 18:00 ` Matthias Andree
2006-02-22 18:32 ` Greg KH
2006-02-22 20:22 ` Matthias Andree
2006-02-22 17:59 Douglas Gilbert
2006-02-22 18:37 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060222163426.GG28587@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.andree@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).