From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue()
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 20:41:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070106151153.GA24274@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070105124246.GA83@tv-sign.ru>
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 03:42:46PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> preempt_disable() can't prevent cpu_up, but flush_workqueue() doesn't care
> _unless_ cpu_down also happened meantime (and hence a fresh CPU may have
> pending work_structs which were moved from a dead CPU).
Yes, that was what I had in mind.
> So you are right, we still need the patch above, but I think we don't have
> new problems with preempt_disable().
Right, preempt_disable() hasn't added any new problem. Its just
revealing the same problem as earlier, by opening up window for cpu
hotplug events to happen in the middle of flush_workqueue().
Ideally I would have liked a lock_cpu_hotplug() equivalent which blocks
all cpu hotplug events during the entire flush_workqueue(). In its
absence, I guess we just need to deal with all these ugly races ..
In summary, I think we need to go ahead with the preemp_disable() patch
in flush_workqueue() from Andrew and the race fix you posted here:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/30/37
--
Regards,
vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-06 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-17 22:34 [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue() Oleg Nesterov
2006-12-18 3:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-19 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-19 0:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-12-19 1:00 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 11:32 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-04 14:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-04 15:56 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-04 16:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-04 16:57 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-04 17:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 18:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-04 18:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-05 9:03 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-05 14:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-06 15:24 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-05 8:56 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-05 12:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-06 15:11 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-01-06 15:10 ` [PATCH] fix-flush_workqueue-vs-cpu_dead-race-update Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-06 15:45 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-06 16:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-06 16:38 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-06 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 10:43 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 12:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 14:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 14:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 16:43 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 17:01 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 17:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 17:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-07 16:21 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-06 19:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-06 19:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-07 11:00 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-07 21:01 ` [PATCH] flush_cpu_workqueue: don't flush an empty ->worklist Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-08 23:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-09 5:04 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 5:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-09 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-09 9:33 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 9:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-01-09 9:51 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-09 10:09 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 10:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-09 15:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-09 15:59 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 16:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-09 16:46 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 16:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-14 23:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-15 4:33 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-15 12:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-15 13:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-15 16:18 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-15 16:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-16 5:26 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-16 13:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-17 6:17 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-17 15:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-17 16:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-17 17:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-17 16:25 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-07 21:51 ` [PATCH] fix-flush_workqueue-vs-cpu_dead-race-update Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-08 15:22 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-08 15:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-08 16:31 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-08 17:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-08 18:37 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2007-01-09 1:11 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 4:39 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-09 14:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-01-08 15:37 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-04 12:02 ` [PATCH, RFC] reimplement flush_workqueue() Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-01-04 14:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070106151153.GA24274@in.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).