From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@free-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux-tiny@selenic.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:58:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080122185840.GA9700@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201019839.14436.30.camel@cinder.waste.org>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 10:37:19AM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 15:39 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > threadinfo-ool.patch: doesnt this break the scheduler?
>
> It didn't when I wrote it, 3+ years ago. But I'm sure it needs to be
> revisited.
>
> > tiny-cflags.patch: obsolete? Isnt CFLAGS already extendable? Question to
> > Sam i guess.
And what was the question then?
We have today the possibility to say:
make KCFLAGS=-whatever
and we have plenty of kconfig adjustmenst affecting the gcc options.
I do not know if this covers it.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-22 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-17 15:43 [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c compiling Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-17 16:36 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-17 17:05 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-17 17:13 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-17 18:32 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-17 22:15 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-18 3:16 ` Taral
2008-01-18 8:22 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-19 7:21 ` Taral
2008-01-18 11:02 ` [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 12:14 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-18 12:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 12:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 13:03 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-18 13:50 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-18 13:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 14:04 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-18 16:29 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-18 17:10 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-18 21:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-18 22:39 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-22 14:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-01-22 16:37 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-22 18:58 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-01-22 19:17 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-20 4:59 ` Rob Landley
2008-01-20 16:44 ` Matt Mackall
2008-01-21 15:31 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-23 22:30 ` Michael Opdenacker
2008-01-24 17:09 ` [PATCH] x86: fix?unconditional?arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling Adrian Bunk
2008-01-24 20:12 ` [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c?compiling Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-01-25 16:09 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-01-20 12:25 ` Rob Landley
2008-01-17 22:44 ` [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c compiling Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080122185840.GA9700@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=Linux-tiny@selenic.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael-lists@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).