From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
orenl@cs.columbia.edu, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:17:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090212091721.GB1888@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090211141434.dfa1d079.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:05:47 -0800
> Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 12:07 -0500, Oren Laadan wrote:
> > > Checkpoint-restart (c/r): a couple of fixes in preparation for 64bit
> > > architectures, and a couple of fixes for bugss (comments from Serge
> > > Hallyn, Sudakvev Bhattiprolu and Nathan Lynch). Updated and tested
> > > against v2.6.28.
> > >
> > > Aiming for -mm.
> >
> > Is there anything that we're waiting on before these can go into -mm? I
> > think the discussion on the first few patches has died down to almost
> > nothing. They're pretty reviewed-out. Do they need a run in -mm? I
> > don't think linux-next is quite appropriate since they're not _quite_
> > aimed at mainline yet.
> >
>
> I raised an issue a few months ago and got inconclusively waffled at.
> Let us revisit.
>
> I am concerned that this implementation is a bit of a toy, and that we
> don't know what a sufficiently complete implementation will look like.
> There is a risk that if we merge the toy we either:
>
> a) end up having to merge unacceptably-expensive-to-maintain code to
> make it a non-toy or
>
> b) decide not to merge the unacceptably-expensive-to-maintain code,
> leaving us with a toy or
>
> c) simply cannot work out how to implement the missing functionality.
>
>
> So perhaps we can proceed by getting you guys to fill out the following
> paperwork:
>
> - In bullet-point form, what features are present?
It would be nice to get an honest, critical-thinking answer on this.
What is it good for right now, and what are the known weaknesses and
quirks you can think of. Declaring them upfront is a bonus - not talking
about them and us discovering them later at the patch integration stage
is a sure receipe for upstream grumpiness.
This is an absolutely major featue, touching each and every subsystem in
a very fundamental way. It is also a cool capability worth a bit of a
maintenance pain, so we'd like to see the pros and cons nicely enumerated,
to the best of your knowledge. Most of us are just as feature-happy at
heart as you folks are, so if it can be done sanely we are on your side.
For example, one of the critical corner points: can an app programmatically
determine whether it can support checkpoint/restart safely? Are there
warnings/signals/helpers in place that make it a well-defined space, and
make the implementation of missing features directly actionable?
( instead of: 'silent breakage' and a wishy-washy boundary between the
working and non-working space. Without clear boundaries there's no
clear dynamics that extends the 'working' space beyond the demo stage. )
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-12 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-27 17:07 [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:07 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 01/14] Create syscalls: sys_checkpoint, sys_restart Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 02/14] Checkpoint/restart: initial documentation Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 03/14] Make file_pos_read/write() public Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 04/14] General infrastructure for checkpoint restart Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 05/14] x86 support for checkpoint/restart Oren Laadan
2009-02-24 7:47 ` Nathan Lynch
2009-02-24 16:06 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-18 7:21 ` Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 06/14] Dump memory address space Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 07/14] Restore " Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 08/14] Infrastructure for shared objects Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 09/14] Dump open file descriptors Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 10/14] Restore open file descriprtors Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 11/14] External checkpoint of a task other than ourself Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 12/14] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 13/14] Checkpoint multiple processes Oren Laadan
2009-01-27 17:08 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 14/14] Restart " Oren Laadan
2009-02-10 17:05 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Dave Hansen
2009-02-11 22:14 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-12 9:17 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-02-12 18:11 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-12 20:48 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-02-13 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-12 18:11 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-12 19:30 ` Matt Mackall
2009-02-12 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-12 21:51 ` What can OpenVZ do? Dave Hansen
2009-02-12 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-12 23:04 ` How much of a mess does OpenVZ make? ;) Was: " Dave Hansen
2009-02-26 15:57 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-10 21:53 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-10 23:28 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-11 8:26 ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-03-12 14:53 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-12 21:01 ` Greg Kurz
2009-03-12 21:21 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-13 4:29 ` Ying Han
2009-03-13 5:34 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-03-13 6:19 ` Ying Han
2009-03-13 17:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-13 19:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-13 19:35 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-13 21:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-13 21:51 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-13 22:15 ` Oren Laadan
2009-03-14 0:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-03-14 8:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-16 22:33 ` Kevin Fox
2009-03-19 21:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-03-14 0:20 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-14 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-16 6:01 ` Oren Laadan
2009-03-13 20:48 ` Mike Waychison
2009-03-13 22:35 ` Oren Laadan
2009-03-18 18:54 ` Mike Waychison
2009-03-18 19:04 ` Oren Laadan
2009-03-13 15:27 ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-03-13 17:11 ` Greg Kurz
2009-03-13 17:37 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-13 15:47 ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-03-13 16:35 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-13 16:53 ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-02-26 16:27 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-26 17:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-26 18:30 ` Greg Kurz
2009-02-26 22:17 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-27 9:19 ` Greg Kurz
2009-02-27 10:53 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-27 14:33 ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-02-27 9:36 ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-02-26 22:31 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-27 9:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-27 9:19 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-27 10:57 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-27 9:22 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-27 10:59 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-27 16:14 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-27 21:57 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-27 21:54 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-01 1:33 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-01 20:02 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-01 20:56 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-01 22:21 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-03-03 16:17 ` Cedric Le Goater
2009-03-03 18:28 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-02-13 10:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-16 20:51 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-17 22:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-17 22:30 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-18 0:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 0:40 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-18 5:11 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-18 18:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 21:27 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-18 23:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 19:06 ` Banning checkpoint (was: Re: What can OpenVZ do?) Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-19 19:11 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-24 4:47 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-24 5:11 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-24 15:43 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-02-24 20:09 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-12 22:17 ` What can OpenVZ do? Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-13 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-13 11:32 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-02-13 11:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-13 22:28 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-14 0:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-03-14 0:26 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-02-12 22:57 ` [RFC v13][PATCH 00/14] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Dave Hansen
2009-02-12 23:05 ` Matt Mackall
2009-02-12 23:13 ` Dave Hansen
2009-02-13 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-14 23:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-14 23:31 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-14 23:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-16 17:37 ` Dave Hansen
2009-03-13 2:45 ` Oren Laadan
2009-03-13 3:57 ` Oren Laadan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090212091721.GB1888@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).