From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Q: cgroup: Questions about possible issues in cgroup locking
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:30:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111222153004.GA30522@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111221200422.GJ17668@somewhere>
On 12/21, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:24:13AM -0800, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
> >
> > If you call exec from a thread other than g, g is now unlinked. So
> > "t != g" will always be true. If you then pthread_create, you now
> > have two threads so "t != __prev" will also always be true. So
> > you now have an infinite loop.
>
> Oh you're right.
>
> But then we can't use t != t->group_leader because that assumes while_each_thread()
> started on the leader.
Yes, this can't work.
Besides, we need more burriers to rely on the ->group_leader check.
See http://marc.info/?t=127688987300002
in particular, http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127714242731448
I think this should work, but then we should do something with the
users like zap_threads().
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-22 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-21 3:43 Q: cgroup: Questions about possible issues in cgroup locking Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-21 13:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-21 17:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-21 19:01 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-12-21 19:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-21 19:24 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-12-21 20:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-22 15:30 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-01-04 19:36 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-06 15:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-06 18:25 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-11 16:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-12 0:31 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-12 17:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-12 17:57 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-13 15:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-13 18:27 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-14 17:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-18 23:17 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-19 15:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-19 18:18 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-20 15:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-20 19:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-21 18:59 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-03-23 17:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-21 17:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-21 18:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-21 18:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-01 16:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111222153004.GA30522@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=msb@chromium.org \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).