linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Q: cgroup: Questions about possible issues in cgroup locking
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:34:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120320193414.GA21277@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120119154522.GA14058@redhat.com>

OK, finally we should do something with this problem ;)

On 01/19, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> I'll try to investigate if we can remove
>
> 	leader->group_leader = tsk;
>
> from de_thread(). In fact I already thought about this change a long
> ago without any connection to while_each_thread(). This assignment
> looks "assymetrical" compared to other threads we kill. But we did
> have a reason (reasons?). Hopefully, the only really important reason
> was already removed by 087806b1.

On the second thought, I think we should not do this.

For example, do_prlimit() assumes that tsk->group_leader is correct
under tasklist_lock.

OK, lets return to the thread_group_leader() check. To ensure we do
not visit the same thread twice we can check 'g', not 't'.

This is what I am going to send, after I re-check once again...

I have the problem with the changelog ;) Somehow it should explain
that while_each_thread_rcu(g, t) can't race with do_group_exit().
I think it can't, list_del_rcu(leader->thread_group) happens when
this entry is already "empty", it should be the last thread in group.
If the non-leader thread goes away from the least, we still have
the "path" to reach the leader. But this is not easy to explain.

As for the barrier. If de_thread() changes the leader it drops
and re-acquires tasklist_lock (this implies mb) after it changes
old_leader->exit_signal (used in thread_group_leader) and before
__unhash_process() which does list_del_rcu().

This means that if while_each_thread() sees the result of
list_del_rcu(old_leader) it must also see that
thread_group_leader(old_leader) != T.

What do you think? Do you see any problems?

Oleg.
---

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 7d379a6..f169bfd 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2323,9 +2323,24 @@ extern bool current_is_single_threaded(void);
 #define do_each_thread(g, t) \
 	for (g = t = &init_task ; (g = t = next_task(g)) != &init_task ; ) do
 
+/*
+ * needs tasklist_lock or ->siglock, or rcu if the caller ensures
+ * that 'g' can't exit or exec.
+ */
 #define while_each_thread(g, t) \
 	while ((t = next_thread(t)) != g)
 
+/*
+ * rcu-safe, but should start at ->group_leader.
+ * thread_group_leader(g) protects against the race with exec which
+ * removes the leader from list.
+ * smp_rmb() pairs with implicit mb() implied by unlock + lock in
+ * de_thread()->release_task() path.
+ */
+#define while_each_thread_rcu(g, t)				\
+	while ((t = next_thread(t)) != g &&			\
+		({ smp_rmb(); thread_group_leader(g); }))
+
 static inline int get_nr_threads(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	return tsk->signal->nr_threads;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-20 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-21  3:43 Q: cgroup: Questions about possible issues in cgroup locking Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-21 13:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-21 17:56   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-21 19:01     ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-12-21 19:08       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-21 19:24         ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2011-12-21 20:04           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-22 15:30             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-04 19:36               ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-06 15:23                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-06 18:25                   ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-11 16:07                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-12  0:31                       ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-12 17:07                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-12 17:57                           ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-13 15:20                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-13 18:27                               ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-14 17:36                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-18 23:17                                   ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-19 15:45                                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-01-19 18:18                                       ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-01-20 15:06                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-03-20 19:34                                       ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-03-21 18:59                                         ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2012-03-23 17:51                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-21 17:59   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-12-21 18:11     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-12-21 18:23       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-02-01 16:28   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120320193414.GA21277@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=msb@chromium.org \
    --cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).