From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Bryn M. Reeves" <bmr@redhat.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: Invalidate the cache for a parent block-device if fsync() is called for a partition
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:03:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120126020344.b3194916.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327315109-7740-1-git-send-email-ndevos@redhat.com>
I suggest a viro cc on this one.
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:38:29 +0000 Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com> wrote:
> Executing an fsync() on a file-descriptor of a partition flushes the
> caches for that partition by calling blkdev_issue_flush(). However, it
The changelog is stale.
> seems that reading data through the parent device will still return the
> old cached data.
>
> The cache for the block-device is not synced if the block-device is kept
> open (due to a mounted partition, for example). Only when all users for
> the disk have exited, the cache for the disk is made consistent again.
>
> Calling invalidate_bdev() on the parent block-device in case
> blkdev_fsync() was called for a partition, fixes this.
>
> The problem can be worked around by forcing the caches to be flushed
> with either
> # blockdev --flushbufs ${dev_disk}
> or
> # echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
Please include your (useful) problem description in the changelog:
: The problem that was noticed is the following:
: 1) create two or more partitions on a device
: - use fdisk to create /dev/sdb1 and /dev/sdb2
: 2) format and mount one of the partition
: - mkfs -t ext3 /dev/sdb1
: 3) read through the main device to have something in the cache
: - read /dev/sdb with dd or use something like "parted /dev/sdb print"
: 4) now write something to /dev/sdb2, format the partition for example
: - mkfs -t ext3 /dev/sdb2
: 5) read the blocks where sdb2 starts, through /dev/sdb
: - use dd or do again a "parted /dev/sdb print"
:
: Without this patch, calling "blockdev --flushbufs" or dropping the
: caches, the result in 5) is the same as in 3). Reading the same area
: through /dev/sdb2 shows the inconsistancy between the two caches.
:
: With this patch, or one of the workarounds, the data read through
: /dev/sdb and /dev/sdb2 is the same.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -424,6 +424,10 @@ int blkdev_fsync(struct file *filp, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
> if (error == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> error = 0;
>
> + /* invalidate parent block_device */
> + if (!error && bdev != bdev->bd_contains)
> + invalidate_bdev(bdev->bd_contains);
> +
> return error;
> }
It doesn't seem terribly logical to do this in blkdev_fsync(). Why not
do it right there in blkdev_ioctl()'s "case BLKFLSBUF"?
Bear in mind that invalidate_bdev() isn't a very strong function -
it won't drop pages which are dirty or under writeback nor pages which
others have a reference on. But I can see that this change would be a
best-effort user-convenience thing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-26 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 1:58 [PATCH] block: Invalidate the cache for a parent block-device Mikulas Patocka
2012-01-20 9:35 ` Niels de Vos
2012-01-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v2] fs: Invalidate the cache for a parent block-device if fsync() is called for a partition Niels de Vos
2012-01-23 16:27 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-01-23 16:46 ` Niels de Vos
2012-01-23 19:23 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-01-23 20:04 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-01-26 10:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-01-26 11:50 ` Niels de Vos
2012-01-26 13:33 ` [PATCH v3] " Niels de Vos
2012-01-26 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-26 21:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-26 21:50 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-01-27 12:19 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-31 16:00 ` Niels de Vos
2012-01-31 18:58 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-31 19:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 19:32 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-31 19:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 19:48 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-26 21:49 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-01-26 22:13 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-01-26 22:26 ` Kernel Oops report (Android gingerbread) Fan Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120126020344.b3194916.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bmr@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=ndevos@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).