From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, "Bryn M. Reeves" <bmr@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fs: Invalidate the cache for a parent block-device if fsync() is called for a partition
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:32:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120131113250.816ee772.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120131190425.GA10533@infradead.org>
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:04:25 -0500
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:58:24AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > One concern I have with the proposal is that it would forever rule out
> > support of >16T devices on 32-bit machines.
> >
> > At present with 64-bit sector_t and 32-bit pgoff_t, I think we'd have a
> > reasonable chance of supporting, say, four 8T partitions on a 32T
> > device. But if we were to switch the kernel from using four 4T
> > address_spaces (sda1-4) over to using a single 32T address_space (sda)
> > then we can rule it all out.
>
> how do you plan to write the partition label in your hypothetic setup
> if you can't open the main device?
>
> And even if we solved that and people could create partitions on these
> devices but not open the main device, or use large lvm volumes it would
> be an absolutely major confusion.
>
I didn't say the kernel would support this as-is.
If the partitioning scheme requires writing to the individual
partitions then something would need to be done, such as a simple
offsetting DM driver.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-31 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 1:58 [PATCH] block: Invalidate the cache for a parent block-device Mikulas Patocka
2012-01-20 9:35 ` Niels de Vos
2012-01-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v2] fs: Invalidate the cache for a parent block-device if fsync() is called for a partition Niels de Vos
2012-01-23 16:27 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-01-23 16:46 ` Niels de Vos
2012-01-23 19:23 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-01-23 20:04 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-01-26 10:03 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-26 11:50 ` Niels de Vos
2012-01-26 13:33 ` [PATCH v3] " Niels de Vos
2012-01-26 21:40 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-26 21:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-26 21:50 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-01-27 12:19 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-01-31 16:00 ` Niels de Vos
2012-01-31 18:58 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-31 19:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 19:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-01-31 19:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 19:48 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-26 21:49 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-01-26 22:13 ` Mikulas Patocka
2012-01-26 22:26 ` Kernel Oops report (Android gingerbread) Fan Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120131113250.816ee772.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bmr@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=ndevos@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).