From: Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix readahead pipeline break caused by block plug
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:20:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120131122039.GA12706@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120131115716.GA19829@infradead.org>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 06:57:16AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 07:42:56PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > So what? Better do a bit more work now and keep the damn thing
> > > maintainable.
> >
> > What if we add a wrapper function for doing
> >
> > blk_start_plug(&plug);
> > ->direct_IO()
> > blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>
> No. Just put it into __blockdev_direct_IO - a quick 2 minute audit of
> the kernel source shows that is in fact the only ->direct_IO instance
> which ever submits block I/O anyway.
Right, so nice point!
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-31 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-31 7:59 [PATCH] fix readahead pipeline break caused by block plug Shaohua Li
2012-01-31 8:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 8:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-31 8:50 ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-31 8:53 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-31 9:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-31 10:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 10:34 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 10:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 11:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 11:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 11:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 12:20 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2012-02-01 2:25 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-31 14:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31 20:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31 22:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31 22:13 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-31 22:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 3:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 7:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-02-01 16:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-01 20:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 20:13 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-02-01 20:22 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-01 7:02 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120131122039.GA12706@localhost \
--to=wfg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).