From: Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix readahead pipeline break caused by block plug
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:10:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120201071000.GB29083@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120201033653.GA12092@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:36:53PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 05:22:17PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> [..]
>
> > >
> > > We've never really bothered making the /dev/sda[X] I/O very efficient
> > > for large I/O's under the (probably wrong) assumption that it isn't a
> > > very interesting case. Regular files will (or should) use the mpage
> > > functions, via address_space_operations.readpages(). fs/blockdev.c
> > > doesn't even implement it.
> > >
> > > > and by the time all the pages
> > > > are submitted and one big merged request is formed it wates lot of time.
> > >
> > > But that was the case in eariler kernels too. Why did it change?
> >
> > Actually, I assumed that the case of reading /dev/sda[X] worked well in
> > earlier kernels. Sorry about that. Will build a 2.6.38 kernel tonight
> > and run the test case again to make sure we had same overhead and
> > relatively poor performance while reading /dev/sda[X].
>
> Ok, I tried it with 2.6.38 kernel and results look more or less same.
> Throughput varied between 105MB to 145MB. Many a times it was close to
> 110MB and other times it was 145MB. Don't know what causes that spike
> sometimes.
The block device really has some aged performance bug. Which
interestingly only show up in some test environments...
> I still see that IO is being submitted one page at a time. The only
> real difference seems to be that queue unplug happening at random times
> and many a times we are submitting much smaller requests (40 sectors, 48
> sectors etc).
Would you share the blktrace data?
Thanks,
Fengguang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-01 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-31 7:59 [PATCH] fix readahead pipeline break caused by block plug Shaohua Li
2012-01-31 8:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 8:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-31 8:50 ` Herbert Poetzl
2012-01-31 8:53 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-31 9:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-01-31 10:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 10:34 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 10:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 11:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 11:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-01-31 11:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-01-31 12:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2012-02-01 2:25 ` Shaohua Li
2012-01-31 14:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31 20:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31 22:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-01-31 22:13 ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-31 22:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 3:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 7:10 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2012-02-01 16:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-02-01 20:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2012-02-01 20:13 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-02-01 20:22 ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-01 7:02 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120201071000.GB29083@localhost \
--to=wfg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).