linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] PCI/PM: Fix kexec for D3cold and bridge suspending
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:30:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201209212130.50085.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348187322.8212.224.camel@yhuang-dev>

On Friday, September 21, 2012, Huang Ying wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 21:20 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, September 17, 2012, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > +cc Eric and kexec list
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > If PCI devices are put into D3cold before kexec, because the
> > > > configuration registers of PCI devices in D3cold are not accessible.
> > > >
> > > > And if PCI bridges are put into low power state before kexec,
> > > > configuration registers of PCI devices underneath the PCI bridges are
> > > > not accessible too.
> > > >
> > > > These will make some PCI devices can not be scanned after kexec, so
> > > > resume the PCI devices in D3cold or PCI bridges in low power state
> > > > before kexec.
> > > 
> > > Don't we need to resume the device even without the kexec issue?  And
> > > even if it's in D1 or D2?
> > > 
> > > It looks to me like pci_msi_shutdown() (and probably drv->shutdown())
> > > depend on the device being in D0.
> > 
> > We should in theory, but we didn't do any power management of PCI bridges
> > before, so this is the first time we have a problem with it.
> > 
> > So I'd say, yeah, let's resume if current_state is between D1 and D3cold
> > inclusive and the kexec comment is not very helpful (the problem is not
> > kexec-specific in general).
> 
> Resume from D1 to D3cold for any device or just bridges?

I'd say every device for starters.

Thanks,
Rafael


> > Speaking of kexec, it might consider using the hibernation device freeze
> > instead of device shutdown (which the kexec jump feature does).  I've seen
> > reports of problems that would be solved this way most likely.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Rafael
> > 
> > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c |    4 ++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > > > @@ -421,6 +421,10 @@ static void pci_device_shutdown(struct d
> > > >         struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > > >         struct pci_driver *drv = pci_dev->driver;
> > > >
> > > > +       /* Resume bridges and devices in D3cold for kexec to work properly */
> > > > +       if (pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D3cold || pci_dev->subordinate)
> > > > +               pm_runtime_resume(dev);
> > > > +
> > > >         if (drv && drv->shutdown)
> > > >                 drv->shutdown(pci_dev);
> > > >         pci_msi_shutdown(pci_dev);
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-21 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-17  8:54 [RFC 0/3] PCI/PM: RTD3 fixes/changes for 3.7 Huang Ying
2012-09-17  8:54 ` [RFC 1/3] PCI/PM: Fix kexec for D3cold and bridge suspending Huang Ying
2012-09-17 20:54   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-20  7:38     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-20  8:19       ` Huang Ying
2012-09-20  8:27         ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-09-20 19:20     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-21  0:28       ` Huang Ying
2012-09-21 19:30         ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-09-17  8:54 ` [RFC 2/3] PCI/PM: Make PCI devices notified when its power resource turned on Huang Ying
2012-09-20 19:33   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-17  8:54 ` [RFC 3/3] PCI/PM: Disable PME poll for PCIe devices Huang Ying
2012-09-20 19:31   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-20 19:39     ` Matthew Garrett
2012-09-21  1:50     ` Huang Ying

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201209212130.50085.rjw@sisk.pl \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).