From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
ben-linux@fluff.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:03:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121116140357.5e0a6d6b@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2439178.tCj2rUMYJS@vostro.rjw.lan>
Hi Rafael,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:09:03 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 01:03:17 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > ACPI 5 introduced I2cSerialBus resource that makes it possible to enumerate
> > and configure the I2C slave devices behind the I2C controller. This patch
> > adds helper functions to support I2C slave enumeration.
> >
> > An ACPI enabled I2C controller driver only needs to call acpi_i2c_register_devices()
> > in order to get its slave devices enumerated, created and bound to the
> > corresponding ACPI handle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
>
> Are there any objections against this patch or comments?
>
> Worfram? Jean? Ben?
I am no longer maintaining the i2c subsystem and will not have the time
to look deeply into this. All I can say is that I very happy to see
this finally happen. Maybe with ACPI 5.0 we will finally be done with
resource conflicts plaguing many systems for several years now.
I took a quick look, and the only thing which seems suspicious is this
function:
> +static int acpi_i2c_find_child_address(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
> +{
> + struct acpi_resource_i2c_serialbus *sb;
> + struct acpi_i2c_find *i2c_find = data;
> +
> + if (ares->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS)
> + return 1;
> +
> + sb = &ares->data.i2c_serial_bus;
> + if (sb->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_I2C)
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (sb->slave_address == i2c_find->addr)
The 7-bit and 10-bit address maps overlap, so the above isn't enough.
You must compare the addresses _and_ sb->access_mode with
i2c_find->access_mode (which needs to be added and filled properly.)
> + i2c_find->found = true;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
Plus, it seems odd that this function always returns 1.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-16 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 11:03 [PATCH v2 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Mika Westerberg
2012-11-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 1:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 6:54 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 8:05 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 8:12 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 12:49 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-17 10:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-17 10:18 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 13:03 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2012-11-16 13:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 13:42 ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-16 14:17 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 15:23 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 16:47 ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-16 17:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3 UPDATED] " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 18:12 ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-17 6:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-17 8:03 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-17 9:55 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-19 22:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-19 23:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 23:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 7:07 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-17 11:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-18 15:55 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-18 21:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] ACPI: Simplify "glueing" to physical nodes (was: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3 UPDATED] i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support) Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-18 21:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be initialized in advance Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 9:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-19 12:33 ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-18 21:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 16:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-19 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 17:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 20:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 21:05 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-19 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 22:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-19 22:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 18:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 22:31 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-19 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 0:55 ` [Update][PATCH 0/3] ACPI: Simplify "glueing" to physical nodes Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 0:57 ` [Update][PATCH 1/3] ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be initialized in advance Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 0:59 ` [Update][PATCH 2/3] ACPI / driver core: Introduce struct acpi_dev_node and related macros Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 9:10 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 9:34 ` [Update 2][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 12:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 18:08 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-20 1:01 ` [Update][PATCH 3/3] ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices in advance Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:08 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-20 9:11 ` [Update][PATCH 0/3] ACPI: Simplify "glueing" to physical nodes Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 9:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-20 21:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 20:09 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 20:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 12:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 13:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 13:15 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 13:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] i2c " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 13:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 13:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-30 11:20 ` Grant Likely
2012-11-30 11:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-30 11:24 ` Grant Likely
2012-11-30 11:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] i2c " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-21 21:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-21 21:54 ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-23 11:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-22 1:36 ` Mark Brown
2012-11-22 9:43 ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-22 10:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 12:36 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121116140357.5e0a6d6b@endymion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).