linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	ben-linux@fluff.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be initialized in advance
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:42:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121119094234.GH17774@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5604758.tWMNMRG2En@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 10:12:52PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> Currently, the ACPI handles of devices are initialized from within
> device_add(), by acpi_bind_one() called from acpi_platform_notify()
> which first uses the .find_device() routine provided by the device's
> bus type to find the matching device node in the ACPI namespace.
> This is a source of some computational overhead and, moreover, the
> correctness of the result depends on the implementation of
> .find_device() which is known to fail occasionally for some bus types
> (e.g. PCI).  In some cases, however, the corresponding ACPI device
> node is known already before calling device_add() for the given
> struct device object and the whole .find_device() dance in
> acpi_platform_notify() is then simply unnecessary.
> 
> For this reason, make it possible to initialize the ACPI handles of
> devices before calling device_add() for them.  Modify
> acpi_platform_notify() to call acpi_bind_one() in advance to check
> the device's existing ACPI handle and skip the .find_device()
> search if that is successful.  Change acpi_bind_one() accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/glue.c |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> +++ linux/drivers/acpi/glue.c
> @@ -135,41 +135,54 @@ static int acpi_bind_one(struct device *
>  	int retval = -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (dev->acpi_handle) {
> -		dev_warn(dev, "Drivers changed 'acpi_handle'\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +		if (handle) {
> +			dev_warn(dev, "ACPI handle is already set\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		} else {
> +			handle = dev->acpi_handle;
> +		}
>  	}
> +	if (!handle)
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	get_device(dev);
>  	status = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		goto err;
>  
> -	physical_node = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_device_physical_node),
> -		GFP_KERNEL);
> +	physical_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*physical_node), GFP_KERNEL);

Here we allocate memory for the physical node...

>  	if (!physical_node) {
>  		retval = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&acpi_dev->physical_node_lock);
> +
> +	/* Sanity check. */
> +	list_for_each_entry(physical_node, &acpi_dev->physical_node_list, node)

.. and overwrite it here ;-)

Maybe using a different variable for the sanity check?

I've changed the SPI/I2C patches to use this as well and they got a lot
smaller as we don't have to do the .find_device() magic.

Once you have fixed the above, you can add my

Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

to these two patches, if you like.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-19  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-15 11:03 [PATCH v2 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Mika Westerberg
2012-11-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16  1:34   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16  6:54     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16  8:05       ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16  8:12         ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:02           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 12:49             ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:06   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-17 10:11   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-17 10:18     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-15 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 10:09   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 13:03     ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-16 13:21       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 13:42         ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-16 14:17           ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 15:23             ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 16:47               ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-16 17:28                 ` [PATCH v2 3/3 UPDATED] " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 18:12                   ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-17  6:46                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-17  8:03                     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-17  9:55                       ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-19 22:49                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-11-19 23:15                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 23:28                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20  7:07                           ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-17 11:24                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-18 15:55                         ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-18 21:10                           ` [PATCH 0/2] ACPI: Simplify "glueing" to physical nodes (was: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3 UPDATED] i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support) Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-18 21:12                             ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be initialized in advance Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19  9:42                               ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2012-11-19 12:33                                 ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-18 21:13                             ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 16:23                               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-19 17:32                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 17:45                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 20:44                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 21:05                                       ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-19 21:56                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 22:32                                       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-19 22:44                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 18:25                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-19 22:31                                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-19 22:45                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20  0:55                             ` [Update][PATCH 0/3] ACPI: Simplify "glueing" to physical nodes Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20  0:57                               ` [Update][PATCH 1/3] ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be initialized in advance Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20  0:59                               ` [Update][PATCH 2/3] ACPI / driver core: Introduce struct acpi_dev_node and related macros Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20  9:10                                 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20  9:34                                   ` [Update 2][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 12:57                                     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 18:08                                     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-20  1:01                               ` [Update][PATCH 3/3] ACPI / platform: Initialize ACPI handles of platform devices in advance Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:08                                 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-20  9:11                               ` [Update][PATCH 0/3] ACPI: Simplify "glueing" to physical nodes Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20  9:31                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:09                               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-20 21:40                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 20:02             ` [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-16 20:09               ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-16 20:18                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 10:29   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 12:46     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 10:29   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 13:05     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 13:15       ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 13:24         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 10:29   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] i2c " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 13:06     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 13:57       ` Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 18:13   ` [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Mika Westerberg
2012-11-20 18:13     ` [PATCH v4 1/3] gpio / ACPI: add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-30 11:20       ` Grant Likely
2012-11-30 11:27         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:13     ` [PATCH v4 2/3] spi / ACPI: add ACPI enumeration support Mika Westerberg
2012-11-30 11:24       ` Grant Likely
2012-11-30 11:36         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-20 18:13     ` [PATCH v4 3/3] i2c " Mika Westerberg
2012-11-21 21:31     ` [PATCH v4 0/3] ACPI 5 support for GPIO, SPI and I2C Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-21 21:54       ` Jean Delvare
2012-11-23 11:39         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-22  1:36       ` Mark Brown
2012-11-22  9:43       ` Linus Walleij
2012-11-22 10:03         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 12:36           ` Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20121119094234.GH17774@intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).